OK, Lets clarify a few things.
One, even if terminated, your shooting into airspace for your project: Means you need to file an FAA report.
Due to a recent act of congress on Drones, FAA pretty much covers down to the surface now.
Two, its not "two" variances, it is a variance and a manufacturer's report.
Three CDRH has already won the legal battle on jurisdiction way in the past. Its an act of congress and much bigger corporate entities have tried and lost on 21 CFR 1040.1. Thus you have to comply. Basically you get a warning, and if you don't respond, then you get a cease and desist. If you continue, you can get a notice of apparent liability, which means pay up, you've been fined. If you still fail, you can possibly meet a US Attorney who will come after you in a civil or criminal suite. Same administrative law process used by FAA and FCC, and other agencies. There is NO day in court before the fine applies, an administrator decides how much and they send you a notice., Even if your lawyer files an injunction the fine stands until proven otherwise. Civil law is much different then criminal law.
Four, Hacking an approved device is not a workaround. Its been tried, and legally failed. Its actually considered worse then not reporting.
Five, The definition of "Laser Demonstration Device" was clarified a while back. Your proposed use fits the LDD term.
If your looking to get around the regs, most of us who know what we're doing will pretty much automatically consider you unsafe. Our industry has had enough of those, and permanent outdoor shows with the exceptions of a very large amusement parks and a few concert tours have disappeared as a result.
The paperwork is NOT that bad. Like most things that are time consuming and arcane, you will not find many people giving away how to do it. However the two Federal Agencies involved are both pretty good at walking you through the procedures and paperwork if you call/email them and get past the first layers of contact. While I hate the "guns and lasers" analogy, CDRH would be termed "Shall Issue" in their attitude, provided you can do the paperwork and quality control tasks. The FDA charter is PRO BUSINESS! Getting an airspace clearance requires you to have the variance, and the FAA is anything but "Shall Issue".
Source: I used to do this for a living, had a variance, and still do some work for those who do. I'll need a new one in the near future, having finally had the opportunity to switch to modern solid state gear. I have the ILDA Laser Safety officer cert. I've also worked as the required aircraft spotter.
Very few people will pay you to just put a static beam up like that. These days that does NOT attract much attention, and neither do aerial searchlights. Usually you have to earn your money by providing some form of active scanning.
I miss the days when I could toss 20 Watts up with short prior notice, those days are long gone thanks to one small group of rich idiots who illuminated an airport approach path for weeks, ignoring a cease and desist letter.
You can quickly end up with Nominal Optical Hazard Zones (NOHD) measured in miles and CZEDs / SZEDs much further then that. Enjoy this link to a partial, outdated, document on FAA 7400:
Steve
One, even if terminated, your shooting into airspace for your project: Means you need to file an FAA report.
Due to a recent act of congress on Drones, FAA pretty much covers down to the surface now.
Two, its not "two" variances, it is a variance and a manufacturer's report.
Three CDRH has already won the legal battle on jurisdiction way in the past. Its an act of congress and much bigger corporate entities have tried and lost on 21 CFR 1040.1. Thus you have to comply. Basically you get a warning, and if you don't respond, then you get a cease and desist. If you continue, you can get a notice of apparent liability, which means pay up, you've been fined. If you still fail, you can possibly meet a US Attorney who will come after you in a civil or criminal suite. Same administrative law process used by FAA and FCC, and other agencies. There is NO day in court before the fine applies, an administrator decides how much and they send you a notice., Even if your lawyer files an injunction the fine stands until proven otherwise. Civil law is much different then criminal law.
Four, Hacking an approved device is not a workaround. Its been tried, and legally failed. Its actually considered worse then not reporting.
Five, The definition of "Laser Demonstration Device" was clarified a while back. Your proposed use fits the LDD term.
If your looking to get around the regs, most of us who know what we're doing will pretty much automatically consider you unsafe. Our industry has had enough of those, and permanent outdoor shows with the exceptions of a very large amusement parks and a few concert tours have disappeared as a result.
The paperwork is NOT that bad. Like most things that are time consuming and arcane, you will not find many people giving away how to do it. However the two Federal Agencies involved are both pretty good at walking you through the procedures and paperwork if you call/email them and get past the first layers of contact. While I hate the "guns and lasers" analogy, CDRH would be termed "Shall Issue" in their attitude, provided you can do the paperwork and quality control tasks. The FDA charter is PRO BUSINESS! Getting an airspace clearance requires you to have the variance, and the FAA is anything but "Shall Issue".
Source: I used to do this for a living, had a variance, and still do some work for those who do. I'll need a new one in the near future, having finally had the opportunity to switch to modern solid state gear. I have the ILDA Laser Safety officer cert. I've also worked as the required aircraft spotter.
Very few people will pay you to just put a static beam up like that. These days that does NOT attract much attention, and neither do aerial searchlights. Usually you have to earn your money by providing some form of active scanning.
I miss the days when I could toss 20 Watts up with short prior notice, those days are long gone thanks to one small group of rich idiots who illuminated an airport approach path for weeks, ignoring a cease and desist letter.
You can quickly end up with Nominal Optical Hazard Zones (NOHD) measured in miles and CZEDs / SZEDs much further then that. Enjoy this link to a partial, outdated, document on FAA 7400:
Steve
Last edited: