The pictures look a little bette this time---you get an A for effort to improve it. Still is not a good laser host compared to a ral, all metal version, either in look , feel, of function so... If you like it for what it is--fine. I would no expect anyone wanting a hand held laser to want it.
Alumininum foil tape? You want to wrap a thickness of foil tape which has poor contact around a diode then put it in an insulating PLA plastic host? How do you proposto make good themal contact and thermal conductance between the differeing materials even if they could work together?
"Thermal contact conductance is the study of heat conduction between solid bodies in thermal contact. The thermal contact conductance coefficient is a property indicating the thermal conductivity, or ability to conduct heat, between two bodies in contact." see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_contact_conductance
Could be done but would be so inferior to all metal host with excellent thermal conductance and cost so much more it is a sily idea.
In addition PLA feels light weight and looks not very good as well.
It would take more time and effort cost to make the PLA look correct/good than a real WL Arctic can be bought for.
Try it and see --maybe I am wrong. Wait a second let me get my tin foil hat first :tinfoil:
As was explained to you in post #11 here:
http://laserpointerforums.com/f72/arctic-spyder-3-replica-100463.html
"It is not the melting point or strength that makes PLA a bad host material but the "Themal Conductivity" a most important property for laser hosts main material mass which for PLA is very low/bad for use as a handheld laser host for any output laser, low or high, use.
PLA has a Thermal Conductivity of ony 0.13 W/m-K which makes it an insulating material rather than a material that conducts, transfers, and dissipates heat.
PLA has about the same thermal conductivity as asbestos, wood, sand, or plaster--almost nothing --even the metalized forms, copper PLAs are only at best 0.4 W/m-K. Simply PLA is one of the worst material choices possible for any output power laser host from and thermal thermal conductivity standpoint.
see:
http://download.springer.com/static/...1b584c4023cacb
Copper is 401.00 W/m-K so ~1000 times better than metalized copper PLA and aluminum 205.00 W/m-K. ~500 times better.
Good to excellent thermal conductivity of the ENTIRE HOSTS material is necessary to take heat away from a diode effectively for long rutime and long lifetime than very short life.
PLA with a therml conductivity f 0.13W/m-K is a very bad material choice for a laser host.
Even metalized PLA is worthless and a very stupid choice for laser host purpose/ use."
Were metal is needed and speciified , only metal will do. PLA will not. Try selling people on a PLA 3D printed bicycle or car--same thing for different reasons---PLA is inferior to metal where metals properites are needed.
Get a 3D metal printer of forget about 3D printing laser hosts---not to mention a 3D metal printed host wrold cost a lot more than it is worth also. See video of good quality 3D metal printed parts here:
http://laserpointerforums.com/f57/larger-model-3d-100482.html?
and here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEfdO4p4SFc
As was explained to you already the real genuine all metal WL Arctics only cost $15-25 each.