- Joined
- Jul 27, 2009
- Messages
- 120
- Points
- 0
@Greendream:
I used to be heavy into photography, and have been looking for a nice point-and-shoot with full manual mode ability, and excellent macro capability a must. I was thinking about the Canon A590IS, until they got a good review in Consumer Reports, and price/availability went nuts as a result! Thinking about perhaps one of the older A series? Any suggestions?
I don't really keep in touch with p&s cameras, but you usually can't go to far wrong if you stick to the big camera makers like Canon, and look for the features you would like.
This site has some great tools for comparing cameras/features (check under the "buying guide" tab) and would be my first stop if I were looking for a p&s:
Digital Camera Reviews and News: Digital Photography Review: Forums, Glossary, FAQ
For macro capability, check the "close focus distance" (or "macro focus range" as some call it) for the cameras you are interested in, and find one that has a small number. 1cm should get you all the magnification you need.
Good deals can be picked up second hand from ebay if you want to save some money. Even an old 3mp can still stake good shots if it has been reasonably well looked after.
Rotated, or tilted? These lower-power modules, the diodes appear to just be pressed-in to a hole on the back. Look at the back side of the module closely - does it appear that the diode was pressed-in at an odd angle?
Tilted, which would mean than most of the output is probably not even directed at the crystal I presume.
I'm working-up something on that for you - but it's very complicated!
Much appreciated, thanks!
Actually, it does! The vandate crystal is very polarization-dependent - having the polarity of the laser lined-up with the preferred direction on the vandate crystal can more than double the output power!
I had a feeling you were going to say something like that. Thanks for setting me straight.
In fact, I finally managed to get my True 5 apart (Woo-hoo! - more on that below), and noticed that none of the sides of the crystal even line-up with the axis of the laser die - I suspect this may be at least part of the reason for the low output on this guy!
Well done
OK, let us know how that goes! :yh:
I still haven't had a chance because I've been so busy, but I'll try soon...
I guess I wasn't as clear as I could be there - what I meant was that if you were over-driving the diode, it could cause it to heat-up to the point that it would shift the wavelength away from 808nm, thus causing a drop in 532nm output.
That was a sign that you were pushing the diode too far at 344ma.
I'm with you now.
It's odd that the performance of those two were so different. Looking at the diodes front up-close through the hole, and also the back, do both diodes look identical?
As far as I can tell, yes. See below...
On your pics - pen #3 (on the left in your first pic) is what the crystals in my high-power module look like! (That's odd, I figured the 176ma one would have the different crystals, but if I am reading your post correctly, it and one of the 200ma ones share the same crystals! Is that massive difference just alignment, or are they using two different diodes??? )
Alignment and differences in the crystals would be my guess... but without measuring some more diode outputs we won't know for sure I suppose.
Yes, if could you get close-ups of just the face on the two crystals in focus at the max capability of your macro? If possible, with some object in both pics or other method to use for scale?
The reason is I am trying to identify the specific model crystals being used in these things!
BTW, the quality & efficiency of the crystals have a HUGE impact on the amount of green you can get! (For example, with some crystals, 1W-2W of 808 will only get you 50mw of green!)
Thanks! :thanks:
No problem. I had a go shooting at 5x magnification, and managed to screw up the focusing in at least one of the shots. I'll give it another go perhaps if I get a chance over the next few days, but here's what I got so far.
I found a bit of decorative ribon for wraping presents that had strips of what looks like mylar woven into it, that could be used to measure the crystal. Here is the piece I used photographed on a precise scale (~1cm across from edge to edge of frame - small divisions are 0.5mm)
Crop from the above shot:
Here's pen 3
I got a better shot of pen 1 although the strip of mylar is a bit tilted by the looks of it, so not good for taking any measurements
Here are more shots looking into the diode chamber:
Pen 1
Pen 3
From a slightly different angle:
When I get these apart I'll be able to get better shots as well as test the output of the PD