 
	
	
	
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
 
	
	 
	 
 
	MarioMaster said:as senkat was saying the laser may be unfiltered and the IR output affecting the lasercheck reading - i think for those lasers the IR filter is glued right to the cap so if you unscrew the top cap you should see a green/blue colored piece of glass glued to the cap, if not - you'll know the 50mW is really BS
quadcam said:As for the blue laser here, even if it's just a 5mw version, I think he got a pretty good deal.

spark001uk said:[quote author=quadcam link=1214255224/12#18 date=1214274591]
As for the blue laser here, even if it's just a 5mw version, I think he got a pretty good deal.
 [/quote]
[/quote]
daguin said:[quote author=spark001uk link=1214255224/0#11 date=1214261319][quote author=pseudonomen137 link=1214255224/0#10 date=1214260776]If you're thinking of the same italy ebay seller I'm thinking of - watch out. They started off selling reasonable 100mW greens at okay prices - seemed decent enough. Then they started taking the same 80mW CNIs and calling them 200mW+ IIRC. Its very easy for unfiltered IR to mess with a lasercheck reading with blue lasers - My RPL 17mW reads in at >85mW on a lasercheck, but measurements with an extra IR filter bring it back down to reasonable numbers. Its possible I guess, but I highly doubt anyone would let 50mW get away for $450 - if they did, they'd be taking a DEFINITE loss so either you got very lucky... or... not
daguin said:It's actually a pretty fair price for a 5mW blue from a reputable dealer. Look around at the prices. I wonder if the Lasercheck can be set to different "ranges" so that the decimal point is simply in the wrong place. As I said, still a fair price for the unit, just probably NOT 50mW.
Peace,
dave
SenKat_Stonetek said:[quote author=daguin link=1214255224/12#15 date=1214263184][quote author=spark001uk link=1214255224/0#11 date=1214261319][quote author=pseudonomen137 link=1214255224/0#10 date=1214260776]If you're thinking of the same italy ebay seller I'm thinking of - watch out. They started off selling reasonable 100mW greens at okay prices - seemed decent enough. Then they started taking the same 80mW CNIs and calling them 200mW+ IIRC. Its very easy for unfiltered IR to mess with a lasercheck reading with blue lasers - My RPL 17mW reads in at >85mW on a lasercheck, but measurements with an extra IR filter bring it back down to reasonable numbers. Its possible I guess, but I highly doubt anyone would let 50mW get away for $450 - if they did, they'd be taking a DEFINITE loss so either you got very lucky... or... not
spark001uk said:True. Any ideas why its drawing 1.2A? At 3% efficiency, even 30mW would only need a 1W IR diode @ 3v (drawing about 350mA i believe) ? Or is it the fact it's Qswitching that's fooling my dvm perhaps?

 You didn't buy it only for the 50mW did you, because you got scammed!  Too bad, probably could had sold it with a honest description just the same.
  You didn't buy it only for the 50mW did you, because you got scammed!  Too bad, probably could had sold it with a honest description just the same.  50mW of pulsed would be around 100mW per pulse with a 50/50 duty cycle, so it wouldn't be too bad at 700Hz. I would imagine 2000Hz would be a lot better at burning though... Just a shame this whole debate is poinless lol...Ace82 said:How does the pulse effect the burning? If it was 50mW, it would produce a noticeable amount of heat, theoretically pop balloons or light a match. When I saw your first post, I was like NO WAY. And I held in my shock because I really doubted it was true. Then as I saw the truth unravel, I was like I KNEW IT! But my new RPL blue 35 was about to get sold! ;D Anyway, for 5mW, that is a good price in a nice pen.You didn't buy it only for the 50mW did you, because you got scammed! Too bad, probably could had sold it with a honest description just the same.
 
	