Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
MarioMaster said:as senkat was saying the laser may be unfiltered and the IR output affecting the lasercheck reading - i think for those lasers the IR filter is glued right to the cap so if you unscrew the top cap you should see a green/blue colored piece of glass glued to the cap, if not - you'll know the 50mW is really BS
quadcam said:As for the blue laser here, even if it's just a 5mw version, I think he got a pretty good deal.
spark001uk said:[quote author=quadcam link=1214255224/12#18 date=1214274591]
As for the blue laser here, even if it's just a 5mw version, I think he got a pretty good deal.
daguin said:[quote author=spark001uk link=1214255224/0#11 date=1214261319][quote author=pseudonomen137 link=1214255224/0#10 date=1214260776]If you're thinking of the same italy ebay seller I'm thinking of - watch out. They started off selling reasonable 100mW greens at okay prices - seemed decent enough. Then they started taking the same 80mW CNIs and calling them 200mW+ IIRC. Its very easy for unfiltered IR to mess with a lasercheck reading with blue lasers - My RPL 17mW reads in at >85mW on a lasercheck, but measurements with an extra IR filter bring it back down to reasonable numbers. Its possible I guess, but I highly doubt anyone would let 50mW get away for $450 - if they did, they'd be taking a DEFINITE loss so either you got very lucky... or... not
daguin said:It's actually a pretty fair price for a 5mW blue from a reputable dealer. Look around at the prices. I wonder if the Lasercheck can be set to different "ranges" so that the decimal point is simply in the wrong place. As I said, still a fair price for the unit, just probably NOT 50mW.
Peace,
dave
SenKat_Stonetek said:[quote author=daguin link=1214255224/12#15 date=1214263184][quote author=spark001uk link=1214255224/0#11 date=1214261319][quote author=pseudonomen137 link=1214255224/0#10 date=1214260776]If you're thinking of the same italy ebay seller I'm thinking of - watch out. They started off selling reasonable 100mW greens at okay prices - seemed decent enough. Then they started taking the same 80mW CNIs and calling them 200mW+ IIRC. Its very easy for unfiltered IR to mess with a lasercheck reading with blue lasers - My RPL 17mW reads in at >85mW on a lasercheck, but measurements with an extra IR filter bring it back down to reasonable numbers. Its possible I guess, but I highly doubt anyone would let 50mW get away for $450 - if they did, they'd be taking a DEFINITE loss so either you got very lucky... or... not
spark001uk said:True. Any ideas why its drawing 1.2A? At 3% efficiency, even 30mW would only need a 1W IR diode @ 3v (drawing about 350mA i believe) ? Or is it the fact it's Qswitching that's fooling my dvm perhaps?
50mW of pulsed would be around 100mW per pulse with a 50/50 duty cycle, so it wouldn't be too bad at 700Hz. I would imagine 2000Hz would be a lot better at burning though... Just a shame this whole debate is poinless lol...Ace82 said:How does the pulse effect the burning? If it was 50mW, it would produce a noticeable amount of heat, theoretically pop balloons or light a match. When I saw your first post, I was like NO WAY. And I held in my shock because I really doubted it was true. Then as I saw the truth unravel, I was like I KNEW IT! But my new RPL blue 35 was about to get sold! ;D Anyway, for 5mW, that is a good price in a nice pen. You didn't buy it only for the 50mW did you, because you got scammed! Too bad, probably could had sold it with a honest description just the same.