3 blu ray lasers for sale >130mw

[ndrew2505]

3 lasers for sale all are focusable ;D if i forgot to mention anything just ask! ;D

all lasers will ship with a printout of power graph

2 coleman max led lights with lavadrives both set at 170ma producing >140mw. both have custom heatsinks by dark_horse and both use 14500 AA size batteries. 1 battery for each coleman host is included. if you want extra batteries i have a few extra. asking 125$+ shipping.

coleman max host


beam shot


coleman #1 graph


coleman #2 graph



still have this silver dx host for sale(penlight host has been sold). silver dx host has a modified rkcstr driver at 170ma and produces >140mw(peaks ~155mw) uses 2x rcr123a 3.6v batteries. comes with 2 batteries but i do have extra if needed. asking 100$+ shipping

silver host graph

 

[caleb]

how did you modify a rkcstr driver to run on 3.6V?

 

[electron]

how did you modify a rkcstr driver to run on 3.6V?

That is a good question, the other thing to look at is the power graph, it was measured with a laserbee, which means the output is really about 123mw's, not 140mw's.

 

[john_lawson]

it says 2 cr 123a batteries they produce about 8v-8.4v fully charged

 

[rfcman]

I just got the rayovac for $85.00 with battery's, realy surprised how strong this laser was.  Beam shot shown above is on par with what I get with mine with no smoke.  I have a build from daguin @ 140mw and this is just as bright and burns just as fast.

 

[electron]

Agreed, daguin makes a fine Laser, I own one too; no doubt you won't be able to see any difference with the naked eye between a 123mw and 140mw, and you probably won't see any difference in burning capability either, you'll only notice the difference on a power meter.

 

[ndrew2505]

[quote author=caleb link=1223020174/0#1 date=1223030532]how did you modify a rkcstr driver to run on 3.6V?

That is a good question, the other thing to look at is the power graph, it was measured with a laserbee, which means the output is really about 123mw's, not 140mw's.
[/quote]
how do you know? do you own 1? these things are calibrated against a real lpm and showed only 2-3mw difference if that much.

i forgot to mention i also tested this lpm with my scorpius d 700mw and it hits the nail on the head with what laserglow tested the laser at.

No way! this laser is bad ass I am really impressed with your build period thank you It is truely the most powerful br i have and i have a daguin br and a jake21 br and yours is no joke. O btw i just jot it

 

[WackBag]

I hate when people who pay thousands for a laser power meter and then realize they could have spent $200.00 for a laserbee I and get the same results continue to bash the lower priced LPM for no real reason

 

[ndrew2505]

I hate when people who pay thousands for a laser power meter and then realize they could have spent $200.00 for a laserbee I and get the same results continue to bash the lower priced LPM for no real reason

i was thinking the exact same thing... ;D lets blame this one on ignorance.... :

 

[electron]

I hate when people who pay thousands for a laser power meter and then realize they could have spent $200.00 for a laserbee I and get the same results continue to bash the lower priced LPM for no real reason

Actually you've got that backwards, I have several hobbiest meters; Then I bought the Professional; no comparison.

 

[electron]

[quote author=electron link=1223020174/0#2 date=1223031995][quote author=caleb link=1223020174/0#1 date=1223030532]how did you modify a rkcstr driver to run on 3.6V?

That is a good question, the other thing to look at is the power graph, it was measured with a laserbee, which means the output is really about 123mw's, not 140mw's.
[/quote]
how do you know? do you own 1? these things are calibrated against a real lpm and showed only 2-3mw difference if that much.

i forgot to mention i also tested this lpm with my scorpius d 700mw and it hits the nail on the head with what laserglow tested the laser at.

No way! this laser is bad ass I am really impressed with your build period thank you It is truely the most powerful br i have and i have a daguin br and a jake21 br and yours is no joke.  O btw i just jot it

[/quote]
I did a direct comparison, the LaserBee is +12% overstated, you get what you pay for.

 

[ndrew2505]

ive tested it with a verified laser and it was within 1mw difference. when my girl gets off work ill go and get some batts for the scorpius and retest just to prove it to you.

ignorance and a 2-3000$lpm is bliss...?

 

[electron]

Hurry while you can, go to Coherent and show them how to build a $3k meter for only $200.00, they can then shut down their multi-million dollar operation.  

 

[JLSE]

[quote author=ndrew2505 link=1223020174/0#6 date=1223056853]

I did a direct comparison, the LaserBee is +12% overstated, you get what you pay for.[/quote]

Thats funny, mine tends to be bang on against my lasercheck, which also stays in the predicted area of Lavas graphs. The only differences I have found with mine, is that it will understate by a couple of mW's. Last time I checked, this works in favor for my customers. The lasercheck is said to perform poorly on certain wavelengths, but is good with IR. When I test 808nm and up, the meters are side by side in readings. This also seems to be the trend with Laserbee I owners, so maybe yours is off? Where did you get yours?

 

[TheMonk]

Well wickedlasers is selling the 60mW Sonar blu-ray laser for $2000.
http://www.wickedlasers.com/lasers/SONAR_II_Burner-73-24.html

We can build one using the Sonar casing for 1/10th the price and double the power.

Professional meters are for Laser companies and labs. I can’t imagine NOVA Lasers shown their customers Laser specs using a DIY Meter. ;D

On another hand, we poor Laserists are happy with our DIY Meters. ;D

 

[ndrew2505]

electron im gonna put it simply....piss off. theres a few laserbee lpm owners here that also have other meters and can and have verified it.