Teej
0
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2014
- Messages
- 520
- Points
- 48
For me, a lot DOES come down to what pockets I have on a particular day.
I have both apple, android and windows stuff, and use all 3 for work...and have for a long time.
I used to see people with giant phones, and think that's ridiculous...until I found myself checking mail on the phone more often, and having to read laboratory reports, etc...
...and suddenly, I liked the larger screen.
I then saw people stuffing tablets into cargo pockets, etc...and thought THAT was a bit nutz...until I got a free tablet that shared minutes with the phone, and found that the added size meant I could leave the laptop in the truck often enough to be worth it.
And, well, I don't want to WRITE a report on a tablet...but READING them is fine, and much better than on a phone, and, its easier to carry than the laptop.
Do I NEED the laptop's processing power all the time? Nope. If I DO, then, I might use the LT or, the desktop, etc.
So, I went from not seeing the point of the tablets, to appreciating the advantages.....and I typically have my phone and tablet on me all the time...and the LT in the rig, and desktops back at the office, etc.
Its just having the best tool for the job, depending on the job...and it simply works better for certain tasks I perform often enough to make it worth it.
As for apple vs android...most of the time, except for whether an app is available in one and not the other...the apple versions are just more intuitive for me.
I've never had a mac fail, and I've had plenty of all the rest fail...but, I do know people who have had to replace mac stuff from time to time...but, overall, based on the large groups of people I work with/know....the mac stuff is more reliable.
Is it reliable enough to pay more for it?
If its mission critical, sure...otherwise, the overall problem rates, to me at least, seem to be reasonable for either platform.
I am typing this on an android laptop...and have an android phone and tablet currently.
My plan through work says this is what I get for free....so, its cost effective...for me.
I have both apple, android and windows stuff, and use all 3 for work...and have for a long time.
I used to see people with giant phones, and think that's ridiculous...until I found myself checking mail on the phone more often, and having to read laboratory reports, etc...
...and suddenly, I liked the larger screen.
I then saw people stuffing tablets into cargo pockets, etc...and thought THAT was a bit nutz...until I got a free tablet that shared minutes with the phone, and found that the added size meant I could leave the laptop in the truck often enough to be worth it.
And, well, I don't want to WRITE a report on a tablet...but READING them is fine, and much better than on a phone, and, its easier to carry than the laptop.
Do I NEED the laptop's processing power all the time? Nope. If I DO, then, I might use the LT or, the desktop, etc.
So, I went from not seeing the point of the tablets, to appreciating the advantages.....and I typically have my phone and tablet on me all the time...and the LT in the rig, and desktops back at the office, etc.
Its just having the best tool for the job, depending on the job...and it simply works better for certain tasks I perform often enough to make it worth it.
As for apple vs android...most of the time, except for whether an app is available in one and not the other...the apple versions are just more intuitive for me.
I've never had a mac fail, and I've had plenty of all the rest fail...but, I do know people who have had to replace mac stuff from time to time...but, overall, based on the large groups of people I work with/know....the mac stuff is more reliable.
Is it reliable enough to pay more for it?
If its mission critical, sure...otherwise, the overall problem rates, to me at least, seem to be reasonable for either platform.
I am typing this on an android laptop...and have an android phone and tablet currently.
My plan through work says this is what I get for free....so, its cost effective...for me.