Benm
0
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2007
- Messages
- 7,896
- Points
- 113
Indeed... if you now drive a diode at 200 mA CW and want 20% duty cycle, you'd have to run a full amp through it. Regardless of frequency, i'm affraid it will not survive that, since some failure mechanisms can be rather quick - catastrophic optical failure for example.
With LED's the limitation is mostly thermal, as long as you manage to keep the die cool, they will tolerate great peak currents. Also, with LED's forward voltage and wavelength depend on current much more than with laser diodes. You can see this in green power leds: If you run them at high current but with low duty cycle, the color goes somewhat into the cyan... even if the brightness isn't (much) better compared to running them CW on the average power/current of the pulsed configuration.
Laser diodes need reflective end faces on the die to lase, and those are failure points leds lack... so its the light itself that kills the laser diode, whereas a led will only die from running to hot internally.
With LED's the limitation is mostly thermal, as long as you manage to keep the die cool, they will tolerate great peak currents. Also, with LED's forward voltage and wavelength depend on current much more than with laser diodes. You can see this in green power leds: If you run them at high current but with low duty cycle, the color goes somewhat into the cyan... even if the brightness isn't (much) better compared to running them CW on the average power/current of the pulsed configuration.
Laser diodes need reflective end faces on the die to lase, and those are failure points leds lack... so its the light itself that kills the laser diode, whereas a led will only die from running to hot internally.