Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

Buy Site Supporter Role (remove some ads) | LPF Donations

Links below open in new window

FrozenGate by Avery

Power measures of various companies products

ohada

0
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
110
Points
0
Hey,

I've been enjoying my new Deluxe LaserBee I power meter the last few days, and here are my measures of all lasers I bought from commercial companies (so far...  8-)), especially made for posting in LPF.
This is not a review of these lasers and companies, any other aspect of product (beam/optics quality, battery consumption, etc.) or of dealing with them (delivery, service, price, etc.) is not mentioned here.
Just dumping the numbers with some technical comments (I think everyone here knows about Wicked Lasers -  >:( >:( >:(, this is just more "evidence").

I think it's important that companies know that every laser they ship may be measured with the results posted on public forums, this would certainly make them think twice before selling under-spec products (either by mistake or intentionally).

For each of these lasers I mention the advertised average output (minimum) and maximum output provided by the seller, though in some cases one of these parameters is unknown.

Notes:
- All batteries were fully charged (or fresh alkaline batteries in case of WL).
- The laser meter is calibrated.
- I have repeated each laser measure at least one more time and got similar results.
- Every measure is around 2.5-3+ minutes, after the laser was off for a long period of time.
- I've had those lasers for about a year now, but they are not excessively used and are kept with fanatic care, so they should be giving the same output (or almost) as the day I received them.

Deal Extreme Dilda 200mW Red:
The output seems to stabilize below 200mW at about 190mW, and the laser became warm.
DX_Dilda.jpg


Dragon Lasers Spartan BP-20 Blue:
The output is not stable but doesn't seem to decline over time either. It seems Dragon Lasers are aware of that since they advertise it as average between 20-30mW.
Indeed it stays in this range and sometimes goes above it.
Note: This is a pulsed laser, the meter shows an average including the "off" intervals between pulses (otherwise output would show higher I presume).
DL_spartan.jpg


Lazershop UK BluRay Pen 20:
lazershopuk.jpg



Wicked Lasers Elite-150 Green:

WL actually imply that it averages on 187mW in their web site showing a pretty graph which is not related to reality (in my case at least).
WL_elite.jpg


Wicked Lasers Executive-55:
A very clearly declining graph, the laser gets warm with time and it seems correlated.
There was no point in continuing the measure since the meter minimum power is 5mW...  ;D
WL_executive.jpg


Wicked Lasers Pulsar 125:
WL_pulsar.jpg


Excel files also attached.

Good night everyone, it's sleepy time for me now,

Ohad
 

Attachments






Hahahaha! ;D

Shows off how much wickedlasers really does suck! ;D ;D ;D
 
Nice Laser reviews with graphs....  8-)

Did you know that you can print the Deluxe LaserBee I data recording sessions
right from the included LaserBee I PC Interface software... ::)

Just go to [File] then click on [Graph Log File]... then choose the file you want
to Graph and [Open] it.
When the Graph comes up on screen...  On the top left corner click on [Print]... ;)


Jerry
 
I didn't know that, thanks for the tip.

[smiley=thumbsup.gif]
 
Why is the Pulsar so erratic? And why is it so low?

I mean we're picking up 250mW diodes for $20. It's so easy, they just need to stick those diodes in the pulsars... it just astonishes me how they don't do anything, it's so easy (and possibly cheaper) to make better lasers... :-/
 
Murudai said:
[highlight]Why is the Pulsar so erratic?[/highlight] And why is it so low?

I mean we're picking up 250mW diodes for $20. It's so easy, they just need to stick those diodes in the pulsars... it just astonishes me how they don't do anything, it's so easy (and possibly cheaper) to make better lasers... :-/

Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong but it doesn't have a driver right? Which might have something to do with the power fluctuations.

--Hydro15
 
hydrogenman15 said:
[quote author=Murudai link=1240606661/0#8 date=1240802652][highlight]Why is the Pulsar so erratic?[/highlight] And why is it so low?

I mean we're picking up 250mW diodes for $20. It's so easy, they just need to stick those diodes in the pulsars... it just astonishes me how they don't do anything, it's so easy (and possibly cheaper) to make better lasers...  :-/

Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong but it doesn't have a driver right? Which might have something to do with the power fluctuations.

--Hydro15

[/quote]

It doesn't have a driver. So yeah, that's why it would be so erratic. I forgot how useful drivers are :-X Guess us hobby laserists take them for granted these days.
 
I can't do a full set of Laserglow graphs, but I can give you some Hercules 350 readings:

Here's my Herc on battery power at the middle setting (Hercs can be adjusted up and/or down, power-wise:

Herc_Mid.jpg


And here it is with the level turned to high, using the external power input and an AC adapter:

Herc_High.jpg


I'm in the middle of running tests on my most recent SZWholesale order, and will be doing a company review with LPM graphs soon (in the next day or so) ...
http://i645.photobucket.com/albums/uu174/BCM_LLC/Herc_High.jpg
 
A Herc 350 pushing over 1/2W! Just one more reason why there one of the best :D
 
BCM: That is one awesome Hercules you have there. I've actually got one on my desk that just tested in at 755.5 mW average. Anyone want to bug the guys on the ISS? ;)
 


Back
Top