Re: GB ROUND 2 OPEN for 10W RF EXCITED CO2 LASERS!
Yeah Mike, thats just what I've been told, RF is a bitch
. I'm however new to the phenomenon but at least I have a good O-scope so that I can test if my "improvements" help.
So what do you think about getting the PWM-cable shielded?
Is it the emitter on the laser-module that produce all the statics or can some RF/HF-static be expected to come from the driver?
As I said earlier my PWM-signal didn't look very good (lots of static) on the o-scope with the laser turned on but from what I could tell, burning some paper, it worked perfectly. Maybe I picked up some of the static in the probe/probe-cable and the signal wasn't so nasty after all... ? :-?
Maybe I should wait for my real PS and perform some thourogh benchtests before shipping off the PWM-modules...
/Tottish
EDIT:
So, both Mikes and my own O-scope readings indicate that this is one noisy SOB. Guess thats to be expected from a 10W+ RFtransmitter huh :
? Do you guys really think it would be such a bad idea to (Faraday-)cage this beast? Could it hurt the laser if the tuning goes out the window or is the momentary performance the only victim? If thats the case I think it would be great if one of you guys with the lasers up'n'running tried to put on a proper shielding and we'll se what happens. As I said earlier, it feels like the natural thing to do to attack the problem at its source...
EDIT2: Nevermind... Chris wrote the post under this one while I was Editing...