ENX
0
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2011
- Messages
- 133
- Points
- 0
Hello,
My name is Eric from South Florida and I am new to this laser obsession.
I really enjoy reading the posts here at LPF. I have made it pretty far reading and experimenting on my own using all of the excellent resources of information here. LPF really has a solid core of super talented people who are amazingly helpful… I appreciate that! Above all, I think safety and respect for the power of lasers is the most important lessons to be learned.
My first laser was an O-like Power Rock 445nm that runs off 1 X 18650, so out of convenience, the first couple lasers I built used these batteries as well. As I have gotten a little better at building into hosts, I have gone smaller, using 16340s, 14500s, and now my new project using 10440s.
I have done a lot of research on the forum and find there is some difference of opinion when it comes to charging these different sizes of batteries safely, especially the smaller 10440s. I currently own only the Ultrafire WF-139. Some say it’s not the best charger, but seems to work pretty good for my purposes thus far (no explosions or fires yet:yh. From what I read on another post, there is recommendation to use a charger that uses a 100mA - 200mA charge rate and the WF-139 will not safely charge these 10440s.
Leaning toward safety, I am assuming that the WF-139 will not charge a single 10440 safely.
In another posting, I found one member who in a host conversion 3 X AAA flashlight, rewired the cylinder battery holder to connect the cells in parallel and then used 3 of the 10440s to maintain the 3.7V – 4.2V and get better mAh than the standard AAAs. As I understand the logic, wiring the batteries in parallel, the voltage remains consistent and the capacity is added, so 3 X 10440s at 600mAh each yields 3.7V – 4.2V and 1800mAh.
If this logic works for battery use in operation, can I charge these 3 X 10440s connected in parallel using the WF-139? Should work, right? Is this a safe solution?
Any help or information on a better solution (maybe a new charger recommendation) would be appreciated.
Thank you.
My name is Eric from South Florida and I am new to this laser obsession.
I really enjoy reading the posts here at LPF. I have made it pretty far reading and experimenting on my own using all of the excellent resources of information here. LPF really has a solid core of super talented people who are amazingly helpful… I appreciate that! Above all, I think safety and respect for the power of lasers is the most important lessons to be learned.
My first laser was an O-like Power Rock 445nm that runs off 1 X 18650, so out of convenience, the first couple lasers I built used these batteries as well. As I have gotten a little better at building into hosts, I have gone smaller, using 16340s, 14500s, and now my new project using 10440s.
I have done a lot of research on the forum and find there is some difference of opinion when it comes to charging these different sizes of batteries safely, especially the smaller 10440s. I currently own only the Ultrafire WF-139. Some say it’s not the best charger, but seems to work pretty good for my purposes thus far (no explosions or fires yet:yh. From what I read on another post, there is recommendation to use a charger that uses a 100mA - 200mA charge rate and the WF-139 will not safely charge these 10440s.
Leaning toward safety, I am assuming that the WF-139 will not charge a single 10440 safely.
In another posting, I found one member who in a host conversion 3 X AAA flashlight, rewired the cylinder battery holder to connect the cells in parallel and then used 3 of the 10440s to maintain the 3.7V – 4.2V and get better mAh than the standard AAAs. As I understand the logic, wiring the batteries in parallel, the voltage remains consistent and the capacity is added, so 3 X 10440s at 600mAh each yields 3.7V – 4.2V and 1800mAh.
If this logic works for battery use in operation, can I charge these 3 X 10440s connected in parallel using the WF-139? Should work, right? Is this a safe solution?
Any help or information on a better solution (maybe a new charger recommendation) would be appreciated.
Thank you.