Hi Diachi,
the equivalent of mass under the laser spot should be less than a gram. As I said, it is highly exothermic and as soon as a small amount melts, it reacts and the whole reaction is self driven. The material covering the thermocouple is stainless steel I believe (Nickel alloy inside). Stainless steel has a higher specific heat, but a lower thermal conductivity than the metal I want to melt. The absorption coefficient might be different, but should be high for both.
560 C is higher than what I need, so I guess that all those little variations can be tolerated in the experiment. At the moment, it looks like it will work, I just want to try it for real. This is why I want something cheap (less than 500$, but if I can get the test done for 100$, that's great)!
Thanks for your answer!
Keep in mind a laser beam has no temperature - there is no inherent "temperature" to a laser beam. Heat is the random motion of matter particles (atomic or molecular particles). A laser beam itself is not made of matter but of photons, which have no mass, thus a laser beam can have no temperature.
"Heat" is caused by a laser beams energy being absorbed by a material surface and turning light energy into heat energy.
Whatever you are attempting may or may not work with any given output, wavelength, or materials you want to heat.
Probably only trial and error will determine if your specific need can be met with any given wavelength or output laser.
Is not a simple thing to determine---many factors are involved.
light matter interactions, see: http://www.princeton.edu/~spikelab/papers/book02.pdf
and
Experimental and theoretical studies of light-to-heat conversion and collective heating effects in metal nanoparticle solutions https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2669497/
Last edited: