You just refuse it and have it sent back, simply put "return to sender " on the box and you don't pay anything.
I just don't agree with promoting dishonesty.
Personally I'm usually not at home to receive packages, so that's not really an option for me.
For the moment though, it's not even clear that the company sent anything.
They already missed the expected delivery time frame....
I'm not promoting dishonesty, rather just reality, and my own viewpoint in how I would react.
If I buy a product, find out the company is full of crap, and don't have what I ordered, when I'm supposed to, I will, and have opened disputes.
If an item arrives as advertised, I just cancel the dispute.
If it doesn't I get my money back.
Only on one occasion have I ever had an item I made a dispute for, show up on my door 2 months later. It was a cheap flashlight from meritline. I offered to ship it back, if they covered shipping, since it probably cost them pennies, they told me to keep it. So I did.
My understanding here though, is that the company is also not communicating with LaserBoi01 at all.
IMO he has no legal or moral obligation to the seller to deliver, or do ANYTHING. If he does get something, I don't see a problem with him benefiting from the experience.
Edit: Actually I could also make the argument that he has a moral imperative NOT to send anything back to the company. After all if he does, the scammer is not harmed in any way, and can continue to perpetrate the scam on other unsuspecting victims. By keeping the laser he would in a small way hurt this operation financially.