Just had some thoughts on this wrt the BR LDs. There are some benefits to using both the iternal PD and the external ones.
For the internal one, the PD current is going to vary for each of the LDs (Red, IR and BR) - the feedback mechanism would have to compensate for that, however, you would get the best protection for the LD "group".
Using the external PDs would allow for the LD power to be modulated to compensate for losses in the optics and actual media (dirty discs).
I would think that the ideal method would be to use the internal PD for absolute power limiting to each LD and the external PDs for normal power modulation.
Daedal said:
[quote author=IgorT link=1189562336/540#554 date=1194469746][quote author=Daedal link=1189562336/540#553 date=1194463668]Not particularly... The PD inside the diode is a better option... just connect to that (as does the PS3) and you can limit the output based on the PD output. This can easily be done with some transistors...
--DDL
If the current regulation would be handled by referencing it to the PD, this would be all the regulation needed, right?
This would be the perfect circuit for the BR. But it would need some safeties. (max current limit to prevent this same regulation from killing the LD in case the efficiency drops too much)[/quote]
Igor, Photo Diodes work by generating some current based on the light incident on them... it's like a photocell. The feedback (this current generated) would be based on the light output of the LD itself... and thus no calibration would be needed aside from actually setting the amount of current pass based on the PD feedback... There is no better calibration method that I am aware of...
--DDL[/quote]