IgorT
0
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2007
- Messages
- 4,177
- Points
- 0
Ace82 said:I believe this is incorrect. The DX 100, 150 & 200 use a completely different driver and open-can diode then those less then that.
I've seen the insides of the DX200, but not the TrueDX50. Wannaburn opened a lot of these up, and says, that the TrueDX50 has the same driver diode and everything as the 100 150 and 200, and that by bringing the crystals closer in a TDX50 you can get as much as 100mW.
I have not verified this myself, but do you have a link with some pics of the TrueDX50's guts? Does it have a 9mm diode? Any info on the current?
Lasers get sorted according to power after they are built, so it is possible. The power difference between 50 and 200 are not far from what i measured with different alignments.
Wait.. You put the crystals from a 5mW into a 150mW? And they survived? Do you perhaps know the output power?What i did to my DX 150 was I took the crystal and collimator off of a DX 5 module, then retrofitted it onto the 150 because I had focus/mode problems on my 150. You shouldn't have any problem unscrewing the brass fittings from a DX 5 module and screwing it back onto your DX 50. It might help. I had to break the glue holding the first lens off and re-align it using superglue and a tooth pick.
Did you have a hard time aligning them with the pump diode?