Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

400mw 405nm, 462nm, & 525nm Sanwu Challenger IIs

dreaming

Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2020
Messages
51
Points
18
Ordered a set of three Challenger IIs. Requested they be set to 400mw. Wanted to see what the highest-output non-Class IV beams looked like.

400mw lasers are not safe, in any capacity. You need protective eyewear for them. If you are new to lasers please do not order a 400mw or even 10mw pointer for your first laser and think your eyes are safe without safety glasses. Be careful! You can't undo this if you mess up! Retinas that are damaged stay damaged!

The green and blue test on my cheap LPM around 430mw. Violet shows 500mw, higher than I'd like but not really important as it doesn't look that much better than my 70mw 405nm, so it's only going to end up being used as a burner away.

I don't know how accurate this LPM is so I can't be sure if this 405nm really hits 500mw. All the lasers I've tested with this have been within 20mw or less of where I expected them to be except the violets, both of which tested over 10% higher than I'd estimated, however everyone says the violets are deceptive so this isn't surprising at all.

1613289416833.jpg
1613289450513.jpg

In person, the beams look slightly less visible than pictured. I live in a very dusty place, so they seem pretty well-defined indoors here, but are not as clear outside as the wind blows the dust away. Pointed into the sky at night they look almost like multi-watt pointers, very good beams, but sky-pointing is a huge risk these days.

Blue and green beams are okay, not great like a multi-watt beam but not terrible. Dots are bright. As far as looks go the violet was kind of a waste, but I'm glad to have satisfied my curiosity. I'll probably end up gifting it and maybe the green to friends at some point. Yes, they already have safety glasses.

Of the three Challenger IIs, I like the 462nm blue the best by far, although this is only due to my personal preference for blue wavelengths. The blue is the one I really wanted, and in person it is beautiful! Getting a sub-500mw bright blue pointer was a great idea, I don't regret it at all. If you're reading this wondering if it's worth it to get a >$300 400mw pointer just for the beam or a conversation piece, in my opinion no, not really, not unless it's a color you just adore. You could get one for $100 on ebay or used from a private seller; if all you want are beams or wavelengths to collect you don't need anything high-end.

What make these worth the price to me is the unlimited duty cycle. I can turn these on and just leave them on. That's pretty nifty and it's incredibly useful compared to the cheap 30-seconds on, 30-seconds off pointers that I'm accustomed to.

I also bought a set of the Sanwu 304s, but they are awful. One arrived broken, completely non-functioning, and one arrived with <1mw output. So for ~$40, two out of three were duds and the third doesn't feel like it will survive even the lightest use. Similar but better quality cheap pointers (in hosts that work) are $10 elsewhere.

Baffling to me: Absolutely no quality control or pride in their cheap products, yet their expensive stuff is ace. Why they used 303 hosts as a starting point is a mystery, unless they just don't want their cheap stuff to cut into their Pocket sales. This needlessly harms their reputation as a company. I almost bought one of their 304 1600mw blues, but I'm very glad now that I didn't, and I'm not spending $120 to find out if their "Thor" clone is decent or not.

1613290387502.jpg

I picked up a cheap Model 808 1.6w ebay 445nm to compare these beams to, but I don't care for it. The pointer is ok, and the beam visibility is great, but I don't like turning it on, it makes me kind of paranoid that somehow I'll do something clumsy or stupid with it, even with safety glasses on, that ends up hurting my vision. So I will probably not be buying any more powerful stuff, and might gift this one to a buddy who is a welder and knows how to use it safely. I would like to get a 470nm or 473nm 400mw pointer but it's only 8nm-ish difference from the 462nm and I can't justify the cost. Maybe if I find one that's cheap.

The 400mw Challenger IIs all burn with fine points. The 1.6mw 445nm tests at 1550mw on my LPM, and is much more likely to start fires, but it cannot compare to the Sanwus points. Even with just 1/3 of the power the Sanwus penetrate faster and are much better for etching fine letters or pictures.

These Challenger II hosts have all been reviewed extensively before and you know what to expect from them. There is a somewhat commonly voiced opinion here that Sanwu lasers are primarily valued for their looks, which I find funny. I'd guess that there's a rather narrow range of people who would think of a mace-like steel tool as "attractive" and the laser community happens to be heavily stocked with that particular type of personality lol.

1613296215533.jpg

From the perspective of someone who isn't into tools for their aesthetics the more expensive Sanwus look like something designed to give an enema to a robot. I'm not saying they're ugly, just that I never thought of them as "pretty" until people here mentioned it; they look like tools to me. They also look like something you could beat someone over the head with and still use as a pointer afterwards. You could probably throw a Guardian or Challenger against a wall and it still function. That, combined with the duty cycle and small, conveniently portable size, is what I consider a highly functional pointer, the aesthetics are just a bonus. Your mileage may vary, of course.

These Challengers were expensive, over $1000 for the set. I could have gotten a better deal buying used or from a builder on the forums but:

(1) I'm new and unknown, which is like the herpes of the private laser sales community

(2) I almost certainly have unworkable requests and ideas for pointers due to my ignorance of hosts, diodes, drivers and technological limitations, and

(3) I was in a hurry so it was more convenient to just throw money at Sanwu.

Jetlasers are cool but their current products are big. I have no other issue with them. Size and weight are critical for me because I have to carry a bunch of other stuff as well. These Challengers (and their case) have to fit alongside a full-sized leatherman, a flashlight, power bank, bluetooth speaker, water bottle, portable fan, spare batteries, lunch and/or whatever else I'm carrying. If Jetlasers makes another smaller-than-the-Mini model in the future like they did before, I might grab one just to check it out.

Don't bother buying Sanwu 304s. They really are unreasonably awful by even the most forgiving metric. Random ebay purchases are a better idea.

As far as the quality of the Challenger IIs go, this was a perfect purchase in every way so far.
 
Last edited:





Encap

0
Joined
May 14, 2011
Messages
6,110
Points
113
I also bought a set of the Sanwu 304s, but they are awful. One arrived broken, completely non-functioning, and one arrived with <1mw output. So for ~$40, two out of three were duds and the third doesn't feel like it will survive even the lightest use. Similar but better quality cheap pointers (in hosts that work) are $10 elsewhere.

Baffling to me: Absolutely no quality control or pride in their cheap products, yet their expensive stuff is ace. Why they used 303 hosts as a starting point is a mystery, unless they just don't want their cheap stuff to cut into their Pocket sales. This needlessly harms their reputation as a company.

You are confused about the low cost Sanwu 304---Sanwu does not make them, they just offer a metered stated output regular mass produced 303/304 to have a low cost option for beginners
They get them from the same places as every other reseller get them. TO make them would be a waste of time, not worth doing.
If you received bad ones you should ask for replacements or a refund.

Why did you obscure the photos and make them not clear colorizing them.
Anyway --comments were good.
 
Last edited:

dreaming

Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2020
Messages
51
Points
18
You are confused about the low cost Sanwu 304---Sanwu does not make them
They show on their website that they beef up the heatsink etc, whether that's true or not I don't know.
Why did you obscure the photos and make them not clear colorizing them -- they went from OK to horrible .
Anyway --comments were good.
I debated posting this at all, seeing how so many people on the internet lack social skills and say rude things constantly. I decided to post it for people who want an opinion on whether 400mw pointers are worth purchasing. The beams were not impressive enough to bother getting perfect. The color you see is the reflection from the dot.

Are 400mw beams really satisfying? No.

Is a 400mw pointer in a wavelength you love worth buying? Yes.

Is it worth >$300? Probably not unless you've got a lot of spare cash or really love lasers.

Is it worth it to effortpost for anons who communicate like something out of an "autism speaks" commercial filmed in Hell? Jury's still out on this one but signs point to "no".
 

Encap

0
Joined
May 14, 2011
Messages
6,110
Points
113
Sound like you got the answers you paid for.
I don't remember anyone ever posting about Sanwu Challanger IIs which they asked Sanwu adjusted to power outputs 1/3 or thereabouts the output they were paying, for so was interesting.
The unlimited duty cycle due rather than 60 seconds on/60 seconds off in the specs is nice benefit/feayure of the lowered output power. The only model Sanwu promotes as unlimited duty cycle ( except 445nm 7W) is the Sanwu Silver.
As mentioned prior -- good comments--clear narrative review about them.

Photos --OK thanks for the explaination --the color was due to environmental reflexions of the dot--weren't intended to be great photos. Have never seen any that turned out like that so asked about them assuming you did that on purpose for reasons unknown.
Some nightime shots of the Challager IIs beams should show clearly the beams at the output powers you have-- could be added to the post or thread.

The Sanwu 304s: They probably will send you replacements or refund for the 2 that were N/G if you feel like asking.
You spent a lot of money with them on the Challanger IIs and are at this point a good customer.

So, overall the 488nm 100mW Guardian is the laser you like the most among the Sanwu lasers you have?
 
Last edited:

gazer101

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 23, 2020
Messages
700
Points
63
I too am becoming more fond of the <1W lasers. Beam quality > output power amiright
 

dreaming

Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2020
Messages
51
Points
18
I would really appreciate it if you would stop responding to my posts. I do not read the things you type. I do not value your opinion. When you go around being acidic to friendly people as your natural & primary way of relating, some of them will naturally begin throwing everything you post into the trash unread regardless of how accurate or helpful it may be.

---

For those who don't hammer F5 all day to respond here, the reason the beamshots above suck is because my camera, like all common digital cameras, I suppose, makes beams look brighter than they are. So to make them accurate I would have to artificially make them look worse. So I'd just blew $1000 on unsatisfyingly-powered beams that I now would have to artificially edit to look worse so they would mirror reality.

Would you enjoy doing that?

Neither would I.

So I didn't.

Buy the most powerful, best divergence beams you can afford if you're into beams. Don't bother with anything else unless you can afford to throw money away, which I can, but it doesn't exactly make me upbeat to do so, so I'd rather not.

I gave the green and violet to friends. They love them. That's good enough, and hopefully someone out there can learn from my mistake.

Laser Ranger review coming next, which will ideally be my final post here for a while.
 

Encap

0
Joined
May 14, 2011
Messages
6,110
Points
113
dreaming said:
Laser Ranger review coming next, which will ideally be my final post here for a while.

Good luck with the Sanwu Ranger, photos of it, and the touchy for whatever reasons temperament in general.
 




Top