pseudonomen137 said:
I'm sorry Jack, but although I see the logic behind what you're saing, I have to completely disagree.
First off, some of the things you say assume that a 2.5W IR diode does not require any heatsinking. Just think about that for a second and tell me if that makes a shard of sense.
Also, I have not disassembled an RPL far enough to examine the driver circuit, but I find it highly likely there would be a buck convertor in there, which means that readings of the input amps can't tell you what's going to the diode.
I've felt the internals of the RPL 300 and my RPL blue when running at it does get pretty hot. The manufacurer has told me 30-50 seconds of runtime is recommended on the high power models, and that seems relatively accurate.
As I've mentioned on the phone, your theory doesn't quite make sense. You explain the shut-off as an undervoltage protection mechanism. That would mean that on the very first auto off, the battery would need to be replaced before the unit could be used again. That is not the case, and it wouldn't make sense for it to kick in after just a few minutes either.
Or at least that's how I see it. It would be interesting to hear your opinion Aseras.
Hi Pseudo,
No need to be sorry, that's what the forum is all about, the exchange of information and ideas.
A few months back I emailed you the spec sheet for battery protection circuit as well as the mosfet switches the battery protection circuit uses to shut off the current when the battery voltage drops too low.
If you no longer have the pdf of the spec, you can download it from this link and read more about how chip works to sense the battery voltage and cut off the current. These chips are mostly used in the lithium-ion chargers, but work for this application as well.
ftp://ftp.sii.co.jp/pub/ic/spd_dtst/dt_sht_e/lithium/S8211C_E.pdf
On the heatsink question, I concede you are probably right, I was typing faster than I was thinking as I was hurrying to get info typed in before my son's doctor appointment. I just looked closely at the diode spec and it didn't mention any requirement for a heatsink, but considering it's very small size, 2.5W is quite a bit of power for such a small device. I am sure they do get hot, but considering that they are only running at 80% when full diode current (level 9) is selected, I think they are doing just fine. From my tests, most of the adjustable RPLs run best with maximum visual output at current level 4 which is ~1.0Amps. At 1 Amp, the diode is only running at 40% of it's rated current.
Very interesting your buck converter idea.
I'll draw a schematic of the driver board and see if it looks like a buck converter, I didn't think of that. After I do the schematic capture, I'll put it into PSpice and see how it simulates.
Now that I think about it, when I was tinkering around with the battery protection circuit, I did measure current through the diode and it was the same as the current from the battery, at least within a few milliamps. These few milliamps are used for the battery protection chip I expect. So this means that basically diode current is ~equal to battery current. If you do measure current use a method that is non-invasive to the circuit. I soldered about a 1 inch length of 20 ga. wire between the base of the aluminum diode assembly and the driver circuit board and connected a LeCroy AP015 DC current probe around the 20 ga. wire. then plugged the AP015 current probe into my scope. To measure the battery current. I took this same size wire and soldered it to the positive terminal of the battery with silver solder and the other end to the base tail cap brass battery contact. To make the connection between the body of the tail cap to the body of the laser I used two large alligator clips soldered tail to tail and connecting one end of the two headed alligator clip to the laser body and the other to the tailcap body. Current was measured the same way by putting the current probe around the 20 ga wire connected the the battery.
I was told that the runtime should be 30-50 seconds right when they sent me the 1st prototypes. In fact, when I got the 1st RPL prototypes and I didn't know about tuning the diode current (I thought the more diode current the more output power, so I always set it to level 9) and at the time was only using 2400mAhr cells; two of prototypes shutdown after about 50 seconds or so. I emailed them and said something was wrong and they told me this was normal operation...
I told them, there was no way I could sell these long term with that short duty cycle and got them to agree to design changes to fix the runtime issue. They changed something as beginning around January of 2007, the run time increased dramatically.
If fact adjustable RPLs that are set on current level 4 or 5 will run at their highest output power and do it continuously..ie 30 minutes.
On your last question about the 1st auto off.
Try this experiment as I have.
Get two brand new cells and fully charge them.
Put one cell in the laser and run it until auto off happens(use diode current level 9 or a non-adjustable RPL so it will eventually shutdown). When auto off happens, shut the laser off and wait 5-10 seconds and turn it back on again and note how long it takes to auto off again. As soon as it auto offs, quickly swap the battery in the laser for brand new fully charged one and see how long it takes to auto off. This will show that it is mostly if not completely Dependant on the battery rather than the laser or diode heat.
The reason you can have auto off happen and then wait a few minutes and have it work again is that when the battery is under load it eventually hits the voltage level that causes the auto off. When the laser it turned off for a few minutes the battery recooperates itself somewhat. This too can be proven by making a test fixture that switches a 2 ohm (10 Watt) resistor across the battery and then measure the battery voltage under this load after 3 minutes. Then shut off the circuit and wait a few minutes or so and then switch the circuit on again and right away measure the voltage. What you measure will not be as low as it was at the end of the previous 3 minute run on the resistor.
These are fun experiments to run. Thing is I've been to busy to do a lot of this lately, there are lots of other things I want to measure as well, just not enough time.
I can't remember the last time I've had such a stimulating conversation in a thread, Thanks.
When is a good time to call you Carter?
How about tomorrow morning?
We could take some of this offline as I'm a slow typist.
I can also explain to you how to disassemble your RPL without damaging it (provided your work area is ESD protected) and more importantly how to get it back together again.
Jack