These generic silicon diodes are known to bring a 0.7v voltage drop.
For design purposes, should one anticipate the .7v drop regardless of diode orientation, or regardless of whether the circuit is open behind the diode?
Example circuit (I took me 10 minutes to draw this, so don't make fun of it! ):
The + supply goes to a 4-pole switch: OFF, Pole 1 which powers Light 1 only, Pole 2 which powers both lights, and pole 3 which powers Light 2 only.
Questions:
In Mode 1 (Light 1 only), will I see a 0.7 drop from diode #1 ? I'm assuming no, because the diode is only acting as a barrier, and the circuit is open behind diode 1. Am I correct? If not, care to explain?
In Mode 2 (both lights powered), Will I see a cumulative 1.4 volt drop due to the two diodes, or ???
Another scenario: the DDL circuit (image courtesy of that thread):
According to the DDL thread, the 1N4001 diode in this version of the circuit contributes a 0.7v drop.
I'm aware that in these circuits, we regulate current, and the voltage sorts itself out. However, in a situation where the supply voltage is low and cumulative dropouts can push the available voltage below the minimum threshhold required by the light, then this diode could become an issue.
I'm also aware that the diode isn't essential to the circuit (it's for reverse polarity protection) and therefore can be removed.
What's not clear to me, is exactly when you will or will not see the .7 drop due to the diode. That's why I'm asking.
In the DDL circuit, you'd think that the .7 drop might only occur when the mistake of backwards batteries was made, thereby enabling the diode to do its job. However, there's no open circuit behind the diode in the DDL circuit, so maybe that makes a difference.
Yep - I'm scratching my head.
Any diode experts care to shed some light?
Thanks!
For design purposes, should one anticipate the .7v drop regardless of diode orientation, or regardless of whether the circuit is open behind the diode?
Example circuit (I took me 10 minutes to draw this, so don't make fun of it! ):
The + supply goes to a 4-pole switch: OFF, Pole 1 which powers Light 1 only, Pole 2 which powers both lights, and pole 3 which powers Light 2 only.
Questions:
In Mode 1 (Light 1 only), will I see a 0.7 drop from diode #1 ? I'm assuming no, because the diode is only acting as a barrier, and the circuit is open behind diode 1. Am I correct? If not, care to explain?
In Mode 2 (both lights powered), Will I see a cumulative 1.4 volt drop due to the two diodes, or ???
Another scenario: the DDL circuit (image courtesy of that thread):
According to the DDL thread, the 1N4001 diode in this version of the circuit contributes a 0.7v drop.
I'm aware that in these circuits, we regulate current, and the voltage sorts itself out. However, in a situation where the supply voltage is low and cumulative dropouts can push the available voltage below the minimum threshhold required by the light, then this diode could become an issue.
I'm also aware that the diode isn't essential to the circuit (it's for reverse polarity protection) and therefore can be removed.
What's not clear to me, is exactly when you will or will not see the .7 drop due to the diode. That's why I'm asking.
In the DDL circuit, you'd think that the .7 drop might only occur when the mistake of backwards batteries was made, thereby enabling the diode to do its job. However, there's no open circuit behind the diode in the DDL circuit, so maybe that makes a difference.
Yep - I'm scratching my head.
Any diode experts care to shed some light?
Thanks!