Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

How to Register on LPF | LPF Donations

Politics Thread ( Don't click if you don't want to see political discussions. )






RedCowboy said:

Supreme Court hands Donald Trump 16th win in a row.​


On Wednesday August the 6th 2025 the Supreme court granted an emergency request from the DOJ to overturn a lower-court ruling reinstating the three Democratic members of the CPSC. The DOJ argued in its request that as the head of the executive branch, the president has the unrestricted authority to remove agency commissioners at will without cause or explanation, THE COURT RULED IN TRUMPS FAVOR GIVING TRUMP HIS 16TH WIN IN A ROW!

Click to expand...
Well, yeah, in the Supreme Court, where trump stacked the court with sycophants that don't rule with persistence or former rulings...

But in an impartial court trump always loses badly. Face the facts head on, trump is a born loser when it comes to the courtroom and facts...

​

Trump loses 93% of cases in court. We know, because we sue Trump and win.​

The Trump administration’s Supreme Court loss over its “sloppy" attempt to end the DACA program is a familiar experience for this administration.​

According to the Institute for Policy Integrity, Trump’s administration has failed nearly 93% of the time when its agency actions have been challenged in court — typically for violations of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

Democracy Forward’s team of APA litigators and experts has helped deliver legal blows to the Trump administration in successful challenges over, among other things, Trump’s unlawful halt of equal pay data collection, illegal delay of e-cigarette regulation, refusal of care rule, and unexplained weakening of nutrition standards for school meals.

The APA ensures that there is a transparent and public process for making rules and that agencies provide reasoned explanations for policy decisions. The APA is, it seems, anathema to the Trump administration.

We’re continuing to enforce the APA in these pending actions involving health care and immigration protections:​

  • Representing Chicago in a lawsuit against the Trump administration’s unlawful refusal to reopen ACA enrollment amid COVID-19 — The ACA requires a special enrollment period be opened in response to “exceptional circumstances” like a pandemic, but the Trump administration refuses to follow the law and open enrollment. It has failed to provide a reasoned explanation for denying millions of Americans access to quality, affordable health care amid the deadly public health crisis. The administration’s decision is contrary to law, arbitrary and capricious, and in violation of the APA. Its unlawful action harms the City of Chicago, its uninsured and underinsured residents, and the millions of Americans residing in the 38 states whose ACA exchanges are managed by the federal government.
  • Challenging the State Department’s unlawful Public Charge policy change — Trump’s State Department changed its public charge policy to deny immigrants entry into the U.S. without providing the public advance notice or an opportunity to comment, and it failed to provide an adequate explanation for the change. We represent the City of Baltimore in challenging this violation of the APA — and the U.S. Constitution. Our lawsuit is supported by the United States House of Representatives, 19 states, 17 cities and counties, 10 civil rights organizations, five Maryland immigrant advocacy organizations, and scholars of immigration law. The court has already rejected the administration’s attempt to dismiss the case, and we are now litigating the case on its merits.
  • Demanding investigation into HUD’s secret and unlawful denial of DACA recipients for FHA-loans (and their misleading responses to Congress about it) — Lawsuits aren’t the only tool we are using to enforce the APA. We recently demanded that the HUD Inspector General investigate the unlawful actions Sec. Ben Carson’s agency took to deny DACA recipients access to FHA loans. We obtained records through a FOIA request that revealed the agency haphazardly created a secret policy to exclude DACA recipients from eligibility. HUD’s actions violate the APA requirements that there be reasoned decision making that’s not arbitrary and capricious and not developed in secret. Following our request, a bicameral group of members of Congress requested their own probe.
At last count, the Institute for Policy Integrity at the New York University School of Law found that the Trump administration has lost 79 of 85 cases involving federal agencies on deregulatory or policy issues — a historically low 7.1% win rate. (Most administrations have a 70% win rate). As The Washington Post noted, more than a few of these are cases we’ve brought on behalf of municipalities and organizations, successfully forcing the Trump administration to reverse course on illegal policymaking.

Our APA win column also includes​

  • School Nutrition Standards: A federal court ruled the USDA violated the APA by making changes it had not sought feedback on when it gutted sodium and whole-grain requirements in its final rule. The Obama-era standards were restored in full and the administration has announced it will not appeal the decision.
  • Equal Pay: A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration violated the APA with its “arbitrary and capricious” rollback of a critical equal pay protection. The administration was ordered to resume the collection of pay data from employers based on race, gender, and ethnicity. As a result of our suit, 90% of large employers provided this critical data necessary for the EEOC to enforce civil rights protections. Earlier this month, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the government’s appeal is moot.
  • Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program: Four federal courts ruled five consecutive times in cases brought under the APA that HHS’ abrupt and unlawful attempt to cut off $200 million in grants to the evidence-based Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program was unlawful. HHS reinstated the program in full.
  • Refusal of Care Rule: A federal court found the Trump administration violated the APA when it created a rule that would have allowed health care workers’ personal beliefs to dictate patient care. The rule was struck down in its entirety.
  • E-Cigarette Regulation: A judge ruled Trump’s FDA unlawfully delayed regulation of e-cigarettes as required by Congress, and the Fourth Circuit sealed the victory by rejecting an appeal. The court forced the agency to begin regulating e-cigarettes.
 
Last edited:
Aorus Forever said:
Well, yeah, in the Supreme Court, where trump stacked the court with sycophants that don't rule with persistence or former rulings...

But in an impartial court trump always loses badly...

​

Click to expand...
Look up the word " always " and educate yourself, because you are as usual wrong.
 
Trump has to deal with political activist district court judges, but even so his win rate is 31% as per Forbes.

In any report, your 99% statement and your " always " statement are as usual, BULLSHIT, just like most things you spout Aorus.

www.forbes.com

Here's President Trump Success Rate In The Courts

Though a recent Supreme Court decision could quickly improve his success rate.
www.forbes.com www.forbes.com
 
RedCowboy said:
Trump has to deal with political activist district court judges, but even so his win rate is 31% as per Forbes.

In any report, your 99% statement and your " always " statement are as usual, BULLSHIT, just like most things you spout Aorus.

www.forbes.com

Here's President Trump Success Rate In The Courts

Though a recent Supreme Court decision could quickly improve his success rate.
www.forbes.com www.forbes.com
Click to expand...
I hate to break it to you, but a 69% loss rate is really bad...

And "always" was just a general statement of how badly he loses, which is very bad...

You can hate on me for putting the facts out there all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that trump is a big old loser in a courtroom...
 
RedCowboy said:
Trump has to deal with political activist district court judges, but even so his win rate is 31% as per Forbes.

In any report, your 99% statement and your " always " statement are as usual, BULLSHIT, just like most things you spout Aorus.

www.forbes.com

Here's President Trump Success Rate In The Courts

Though a recent Supreme Court decision could quickly improve his success rate.
www.forbes.com www.forbes.com
Click to expand...
You're a clown, you call anyone who rules against your child rapest a "political activist district court judges", you do it so much it's become a joke and meaningless...
 
RedCowboy said:
Trump has to deal with political activist district court judges, but even so his win rate is 31% as per Forbes.

In any report, your 99% statement and your " always " statement are as usual, BULLSHIT, just like most things you spout Aorus.

www.forbes.com

Here's President Trump Success Rate In The Courts

Though a recent Supreme Court decision could quickly improve his success rate.
www.forbes.com www.forbes.com
Click to expand...
You only call courts activist when Trump loses. That, alone, makes your point pointless.
 
You butthurt TDS turds are hilarious. :ROFLMAO:😝🤪

Trump won and you can't stand it, Trump is winning every day, TRUMP IN YOUR WOKE SHIT STINKING FACES! 😝🤣🤪

c3d9b3615eaaaff2dbd07cf49f1d0cbc
 
Using Ghislaine Maxwell to say that she exonerated Trump, something no one knows for certain, just keeps this alive and well. This is the scandal that just won't go away.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.


Back
Top