Gazoo
0
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 3,206
- Points
- 38
Where the graph dips at less than 100mw's is when the laser is beginning to heat up. Come to think of it, I think if you divide the numbers on the bottom of the graph by 2 it will be close to the actual seconds the laser was graphed.
I admit I really need to time it to be sure but I think it's close. For it's rated duty cycle of 90 seconds, and considering it is an X105, I am not complaining. It is doing what it was designed to do.
Other than that, I agree with you. The main point I was trying to make is the regulator in the Nova does a good job. It doesn't matter what battery chemistry is used...the diode is drawing the same amount of current as is evidenced by the graphs. I know that in order to regulate the output the laser would require additional heatsinking or a TEC like used in Labbys, and use of a photo diode. I don't know if Nova makes use of the photo diode in its X series of lasers.
I admit I really need to time it to be sure but I think it's close. For it's rated duty cycle of 90 seconds, and considering it is an X105, I am not complaining. It is doing what it was designed to do.
Other than that, I agree with you. The main point I was trying to make is the regulator in the Nova does a good job. It doesn't matter what battery chemistry is used...the diode is drawing the same amount of current as is evidenced by the graphs. I know that in order to regulate the output the laser would require additional heatsinking or a TEC like used in Labbys, and use of a photo diode. I don't know if Nova makes use of the photo diode in its X series of lasers.