Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

Buy Site Supporter Role (remove some ads) | LPF Donations

Links below open in new window

FrozenGate by Avery

A new way to create antimatter with lasers.

RedCowboy

0
LPF Site Supporter
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
9,963
Points
113
Understanding antimatter holds many possibilities, soon it may be easier to make.


How about a gama ray laser ?

 
Last edited:





I was thinking because gama rays are produced in the process, then if we could use gama ray lasers, we could turn electrons into positrons more readily, possibly fine tuned by varying the pulse rate frequency to a multiple of the gama ray ??

From the web
High-energy laser pulses cause electrons to oscillate, giving off gamma rays that produce electrons and positrons. An optical trap for matter-antimatter plasma is formed by four laser beams arranged in one plane, all heading towards the same point.
 
Yeah looks like they're getting into that weird area where you can effectively turn energy into matter and vice versa, wonder how well it scales up and what the net efficiency is. It looks at least like this would be far more compact and less energy intense than needing a massive particle accelerator to produce antimatter.
 
I imagine it's not hard to Generate Positrons. Medicine has been using Positrons for Years. A PET Scan uses Positrons.


PET = Positron Emission Tomography
 
Yeah, but then you have to manufacture, store, and manage a bunch of radioactive material that most likely emits particles that aren't positrons along side the positrons you want. And because the positrons are being emitted from matter I think its most likely going to bump into another bit of matter and annihilate before escaping the bulk material to be captured by a magnetic trap. IIRC, a PET scan isn't directly imaging using the positrons, it captures the gamma rays emitted when the positron annihilates with an electron.

Also, it might take a massive amount of material to get the same amount of positrons out as this new laser system, and that raises a lot of issues with costs and being able to safely operate a system with large amounts of radioactive material. The licensing and certifications alone for being able to posses and store large quantities of material like that would be a nightmare.
 
Amazingly not only uranium is now enriched by laser, isotopic enrichment of chlorine, molybdenum, carbon and silicon are enriched via. the silex laser enrichment process and apparently it's easier and less expensive that using centrifuges...... soon every kid on the block will be making antimatter bombs. :)

 
They are still making extemely small amounts and it looks to be through pair production so they are indeed making the particles via energy to mass conversion. The trick is separating and isolating the positrons fast enough! What they then need is to make antiprotons which are thousands of times more massive to combine and make the anti hydrogen atoms. Still interesting but long way from gram scale production.
 
Hey, 1st you crawl then learn to walk and later run like the wind.
The mere fact we are converting energy to matter in other than an explosion or collision is fantastic, I can only imagine how amazing the lives of future generations could be as we evolve.
 
I just hope they're careful, theres a lot of raw energy even in the smallest amount of matter;)
I remember before they turned on the LHC, people were worried it was going to create a black hole and destroy the Earth
Or create strange quarks, and destroy the Earth XD
 
When you have a lot of Atoms the energy is enormous. E-MC^2.

Eg. 1 Kg of Uraniun contains 2,550,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Atoms.


Working with Single Atoms you have almost no energy.
 
"laser pincers generate antimatter" article says "But now, researchers have designed a new method that could produce antimatter in smaller labs. While the team hasn’t built the device yet, simulations show that the principle is feasible" and "For now the concept remains speculative" + the article is 3 years old/from July 2021 with no word about it since then so....
 

 





Back
Top