Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

How to Register on LPF | LPF Donations

Politics Thread ( Don't click if you don't want to see political discussions. )






trump has “TACO’d” again and has dropped his demand that Rupert Murdoch be deposed “immediately” because he’s “old and sick” in his defamation case against the Wall Street Journal in Miami Federal Court. Murdoch’s lawyers told Trump’s lawyers that if he doesn’t drop the demand, they will move for sanctions AND immediately take Trump’s deposition the next day.
 
Everything your deep state dems have thrown at Trump has failed and it's all been contrived.
Enjoy the next 3+ years, I know I will.;)
I will enjoy it more once Democrats take over the House. Nothing has failed for Democrats so far. In fact, they are positioned to bring the Epstein files to light. That will be bad for Dumbass Donald.
 
Anything democrats could bring would be fake and contrived, hell you could line up dozens of lying Trump hater fakes willing to compose, too bad for you Maxwell has already exonerated Trump, your liars will need to manufacture deep fake video to even get any attention, but the truth is Bill Clinton and many other wealthy democrats will be protected, Epstein is dead and so is this drama, but keep milking it as you hype and hope..... However don't count on democrats taking the House this midterm and nobody will care one bit about Epstein come the midterms, but hype and hope, it's all you have, LOL 🤪

HYPES and HOPES you TDS dopes, Trump is here to stay.

 
Last edited:
Trump said he cut drug prices 1500%. Anyone who got through grade school math knows that is ridiculous. You can't cut anything more that 100% as you'd be paying people to take these drugs. How hilarious is that?!
 
Thank GOD we have Trump for the next 1263 days.
Could you imagine if Harris had a chance, I mean.... she didn't..... but could you imagine?
giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
Thank GOD we have Trump for the next 1263 days.
Could you imagine if Harris had a chance, I mean.... she didn't..... but could you imagine?
giphy.gif
Yeah, I can imagine, lower prices on everything, no tariffs with a booming economy, the stock market at all-time highs for 8 months in a row, no "big bullshit bill" giving huge tax breaks to the 1% while taking food from childrens mouths and taking heathcare from hundereds of millions of Americans, social security and medicare safe, no masked gestapo running around and scooping up people with no due proecces while still deporting more illeagels in greater numbers than trump ever has, job growth at all time highs month after month, no convicted criminal/child rapest in the Whitehouse embarrassing America on the world stage... sounds great to me!:D

Not to mention, trump would most likely be in prison where he belongs from all the criminal charges he was facing for the provable crimes he commited! My God, wouldn't that be great all by itself...:D

If only...:unsure:
 
Last edited:
Then he really must hate himself, he loses in a courtroom 99% of the time, where reality and facts matter... ;) (n)
Reality and facts....... Your statement is factually incorrect, basically it's just more hate filled Aorus bullshit.
 

Trump, Apple to Announce Fresh $100 Billion US Investment.​


The announcement at the White House on Wednesday includes a new manufacturing program designed to bring more of Apple’s supply chain to the US, with an eye toward assembling additional critical components domestically, according to a White House official who detailed the announcement on the condition of anonymity. Apple Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook is expected to attend the event.

“President Trump’s America First economic agenda has secured trillions of dollars in investments that support American jobs and bolster American businesses,” White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in a statement. “Today’s announcement with Apple is another win for our manufacturing industry that will simultaneously help reshore the production of critical components to protect America’s economic and national security.”
 

Supreme Court hands Donald Trump 16th win in a row.​


On Wednesday August the 6th 2025 the Supreme court granted an emergency request from the DOJ to overturn a lower-court ruling reinstating the three Democratic members of the CPSC. The DOJ argued in its request that as the head of the executive branch, the president has the unrestricted authority to remove agency commissioners at will without cause or explanation, THE COURT RULED IN TRUMPS FAVOR GIVING TRUMP HIS 16TH WIN IN A ROW!

 

Supreme Court hands Donald Trump 16th win in a row.​


On Wednesday August the 6th 2025 the Supreme court granted an emergency request from the DOJ to overturn a lower-court ruling reinstating the three Democratic members of the CPSC. The DOJ argued in its request that as the head of the executive branch, the president has the unrestricted authority to remove agency commissioners at will without cause or explanation, THE COURT RULED IN TRUMPS FAVOR GIVING TRUMP HIS 16TH WIN IN A ROW!

Well, yeah, in the Supreme Court, where trump stacked the court with sycophants that don't rule with persistence or former rulings...

But in an impartial court trump always loses badly. Face the facts head on, trump is a born loser when it comes to the courtroom and facts...

Trump loses 93% of cases in court. We know, because we sue Trump and win.​

The Trump administration’s Supreme Court loss over its “sloppy" attempt to end the DACA program is a familiar experience for this administration.

According to the Institute for Policy Integrity, Trump’s administration has failed nearly 93% of the time when its agency actions have been challenged in court — typically for violations of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

Democracy Forward’s team of APA litigators and experts has helped deliver legal blows to the Trump administration in successful challenges over, among other things, Trump’s unlawful halt of equal pay data collection, illegal delay of e-cigarette regulation, refusal of care rule, and unexplained weakening of nutrition standards for school meals.

The APA ensures that there is a transparent and public process for making rules and that agencies provide reasoned explanations for policy decisions. The APA is, it seems, anathema to the Trump administration.

We’re continuing to enforce the APA in these pending actions involving health care and immigration protections:

  • Representing Chicago in a lawsuit against the Trump administration’s unlawful refusal to reopen ACA enrollment amid COVID-19 — The ACA requires a special enrollment period be opened in response to “exceptional circumstances” like a pandemic, but the Trump administration refuses to follow the law and open enrollment. It has failed to provide a reasoned explanation for denying millions of Americans access to quality, affordable health care amid the deadly public health crisis. The administration’s decision is contrary to law, arbitrary and capricious, and in violation of the APA. Its unlawful action harms the City of Chicago, its uninsured and underinsured residents, and the millions of Americans residing in the 38 states whose ACA exchanges are managed by the federal government.
  • Challenging the State Department’s unlawful Public Charge policy change — Trump’s State Department changed its public charge policy to deny immigrants entry into the U.S. without providing the public advance notice or an opportunity to comment, and it failed to provide an adequate explanation for the change. We represent the City of Baltimore in challenging this violation of the APA — and the U.S. Constitution. Our lawsuit is supported by the United States House of Representatives, 19 states, 17 cities and counties, 10 civil rights organizations, five Maryland immigrant advocacy organizations, and scholars of immigration law. The court has already rejected the administration’s attempt to dismiss the case, and we are now litigating the case on its merits.
  • Demanding investigation into HUD’s secret and unlawful denial of DACA recipients for FHA-loans (and their misleading responses to Congress about it) — Lawsuits aren’t the only tool we are using to enforce the APA. We recently demanded that the HUD Inspector General investigate the unlawful actions Sec. Ben Carson’s agency took to deny DACA recipients access to FHA loans. We obtained records through a FOIA request that revealed the agency haphazardly created a secret policy to exclude DACA recipients from eligibility. HUD’s actions violate the APA requirements that there be reasoned decision making that’s not arbitrary and capricious and not developed in secret. Following our request, a bicameral group of members of Congress requested their own probe.
At last count, the Institute for Policy Integrity at the New York University School of Law found that the Trump administration has lost 79 of 85 cases involving federal agencies on deregulatory or policy issues a historically low 7.1% win rate. (Most administrations have a 70% win rate). As The Washington Post noted, more than a few of these are cases we’ve brought on behalf of municipalities and organizations, successfully forcing the Trump administration to reverse course on illegal policymaking.

Our APA win column also includes

  • School Nutrition Standards: A federal court ruled the USDA violated the APA by making changes it had not sought feedback on when it gutted sodium and whole-grain requirements in its final rule. The Obama-era standards were restored in full and the administration has announced it will not appeal the decision.
  • Equal Pay: A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration violated the APA with its “arbitrary and capricious” rollback of a critical equal pay protection. The administration was ordered to resume the collection of pay data from employers based on race, gender, and ethnicity. As a result of our suit, 90% of large employers provided this critical data necessary for the EEOC to enforce civil rights protections. Earlier this month, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the government’s appeal is moot.
  • Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program: Four federal courts ruled five consecutive times in cases brought under the APA that HHS’ abrupt and unlawful attempt to cut off $200 million in grants to the evidence-based Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program was unlawful. HHS reinstated the program in full.
  • Refusal of Care Rule: A federal court found the Trump administration violated the APA when it created a rule that would have allowed health care workers’ personal beliefs to dictate patient care. The rule was struck down in its entirety.
  • E-Cigarette Regulation: A judge ruled Trump’s FDA unlawfully delayed regulation of e-cigarettes as required by Congress, and the Fourth Circuit sealed the victory by rejecting an appeal. The court forced the agency to begin regulating e-cigarettes.
 
Last edited:
It's fairly close, close enough for this thread...

Not close at all, your statement was totally false.
In other words, you are full of shit, you are a liar, you are ignorant and you have a bad attitude about it.
 
Well, yeah, in the Supreme Court, where trump stacked the court with sycophants that don't rule with persistence or former rulings...

But in an impartial court trump always loses badly...

Look up the word " always " and educate yourself, because you are as usual wrong.
 


Back
Top