Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

Beam expander on a camera

Joined
Feb 22, 2017
Messages
253
Points
28
There's lots of talk about beam expanders on lasers, but how about using them on small cameras? Are the optics high enough quality? I assume so. Would a BE be compatible with camera optics? The idea would be to just slide a BE over a pocket camera's telescoping lens and maybe using magnets to hold it on, for the purpose of improving lighting conditions. Where can I find a good one to try? Ideally the small lens would be around 15-20mm, and the big one around 40-60mm.
 





Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
12,031
Points
113
A telescope is the same thing as a beam expander, a camera telephoto lens is one too but custom made for the camera sensor. You could try to use a beam expander on a camera, but the aperture size might be too far off for the sensor size.
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2017
Messages
349
Points
63
You would need achromats (lenses where the focal shift is the same over the visible spectrum) which are pretty costly. But if you can get a lens pair cheap it will definitely work with some degraded optical image quality.

Singlemode
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2017
Messages
253
Points
28
I wouldn't call a telephoto lens a BE in the way I mean. I'm hoping, if possible, to use one as an aperture expander (like a reverse BE?) vs expanding light for zoom. That's why I don't know if a normal BE would work. Because it might just act like a wide angle lense instead of a neutral zoom extra light gathering lens. I've had the idea a few time, then keep remembering that what I want might be impossible without a much more complex lens setup.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
12,031
Points
113
I didn't think about the different wavelengths of color, good point SM.
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2017
Messages
253
Points
28
I guess normal light wouldn't work through a BE very well anyway
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2013
Messages
17,386
Points
113
A BE is a telescope. In fact, in laser optics the two are used interchangeably.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
2,560
Points
113
There's lots of talk about beam expanders on lasers, but how about using them on small cameras? Are the optics high enough quality? I assume so. Would a BE be compatible with camera optics? The idea would be to just slide a BE over a pocket camera's telescoping lens and maybe using magnets to hold it on, for the purpose of improving lighting conditions. Where can I find a good one to try? Ideally the small lens would be around 15-20mm, and the big one around 40-60mm.

If you have a Wal-Mart near you keyword search "phone telephoto lens" to test your idea. Some are less than $14.
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2017
Messages
253
Points
28
I'm not looking for extra zoom, just extra light gathering ability that will still give me the same range of focus too.

I know they make extra zoom add ons for many cameras. My really old Sony H2 had some specifically designed for it.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
2,560
Points
113
I'm not looking for extra zoom, just extra light gathering ability that will still give me the same range of focus too.

I know they make extra zoom add ons for many cameras. My really old Sony H2 had some specifically designed for it.

You didn't state what kind of camera you have which doesn't matter to us. What matters is the answer. That answer is you want a fast lens. However, that won't solve the problem because as an add-on lens you will still be limited by this camera's internal lens system which seems to not be interchangable.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
9,880
Points
113
Chromatic aberrations could be an issue, many camera zoom lenses have multiple lenses to correct for chromatic aberrations, simple beam expanders won't.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
12,031
Points
113
This thread discussion makes me wonder what lenses were used with black and white film before color, I mean, even if black and white, there were different colors producing lighter and darker areas on the film which couldn't have been as sharp as they would have been if using a achromatic lens to keep the blur down, right?
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2017
Messages
349
Points
63
Only the film itself was black/white. The light hitting the film was in color and all chromatic errors were the same...

Singlemode
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
2,560
Points
113
This thread discussion makes me wonder what lenses were used with black and white film before color, I mean, even if black and white, there were different colors producing lighter and darker areas on the film which couldn't have been as sharp as they would have been if using a achromatic lens to keep the blur down, right?
19th century photographic lens developments.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_photographic_lens_design#Overcoming_optical_aberrations
 




Top