i know the main difference between the two are down to operating mode and diode lifetime. but interms of visibility/beam brightness, which 1 is better?
i always thought CW was brighter than pulsed?
say u have two 473nm 30mw pointers, 1 CW and other pulsed.. which one would seem brighter?
also, i read somwhere that 100mw pulsed would seem equivalent to 60mw CW- is this true?
if a pulsed laser was mode-hopping, would you see tem01-02 beam changes like CW lasers?
i want a high powered blue pointer which i could use for long distance pointing. ive had a 20mw blue CW which really is beautiful, but its just not powerful enough for me, even without ambient lighting.
DL's claim their spartan BP 60mw is perfect for long distance pointing but how can i be so sure of this?
im thinking about buying the spartan BP 60mw as a tryout. im willing to pay the $1500 asked but their returns policy states u can get full refund minus shipping costs within 7 days, no questions asked.
i always thought CW was brighter than pulsed?
say u have two 473nm 30mw pointers, 1 CW and other pulsed.. which one would seem brighter?
also, i read somwhere that 100mw pulsed would seem equivalent to 60mw CW- is this true?
if a pulsed laser was mode-hopping, would you see tem01-02 beam changes like CW lasers?
i want a high powered blue pointer which i could use for long distance pointing. ive had a 20mw blue CW which really is beautiful, but its just not powerful enough for me, even without ambient lighting.
DL's claim their spartan BP 60mw is perfect for long distance pointing but how can i be so sure of this?
im thinking about buying the spartan BP 60mw as a tryout. im willing to pay the $1500 asked but their returns policy states u can get full refund minus shipping costs within 7 days, no questions asked.