Post your PC setup .

[ElektroFreak]

^What do you use that for? Just gaming? Seems like the kind of system one might have a professional use for, ie design, music production, etc.. It would be wasted on games..

 

[weetsie]

It would be wasted on games..

not if he is playing crysis @ 5760X1080

what FOV is that?

 

[Traveller]

...Just gaming?

What do you mean with "just for"...

Lol

His system would certainly make my in-transit copies of Bioshock 2 & Mass Effect 2 & Alien vs. Predator look werywery good...

A few "older" games... you should see them in realtime


click on images for full res!

Bioshock



Mass Effect



Crysis Warhead



Far Cry2

 

[KiLLrB]

crysis at 23 fps not bad at all

 

[Traveller]

crysis at 23 fps not bad at all

Lol, well it wasn't that bad for the entire game but to this day, it's still the hardest game to render

click on image for full res:

 

[BuildAbluraylaser]

I wonder how my Mac Pro would handle crysis...

Maybe I should try it, it looks awesome!

 

[f22warzone]

^What do you use that for? Just gaming? Seems like the kind of system one might have a professional use for, ie design, music production, etc.. It would be wasted on games..

I am a GIS analysis and AutoCAD drafter for a surveying company and I work on the stuff here at my dorm.... ahh the joys of the internet and allowing me to keep my job : )

But ya I am running crysis at 27-30 fps max settings no aa yet as that kills the card having to work on that many pixies : )..... on the 20th I get my 2nd 5970 card : ) it’s a sweet, and mw2 I run at near 100fps so it’s almost real time on max settings : )

Thos are some beautiful screen shots…. I am going to have to play the missions again so I can get some nice back grounds : )

 

[Traveller]

...and mw2 I run at near 100fps ...
Thos are some beautiful screen shots…

mw2? As in COD Modern Warfare 2? That's one of my all-time favorites! I couldn't imagine it at full res at 100fps...

I get 60fps (vsynch on, always!) but that's at a humble 1680x1050... still, I remember my first "gaming" PC: ATI Rage Pro with a whopping 8MB onboard, Pentium II 233. Playing Quake II online, I couldn't figure why I was always getting fragged 'til I realized I was playing the game at 1024x768 at an avg. of 10FPS... lol I finally managed to score a few frags when I "settled for" 800x600...

Given that, I'm still pretty floored when playing today's games at 1680x1050...!

click on image for full res:

 

[f22warzone]

but yes COD Modern Warfare 2 : ) i just played and for some reason only got between 88 and 93 fps but oh well still over 60 : ) ..... wait until you play on 3 monitors its simply awesome.

By f22warzone at 2010-02-08

 

[nikokapo]

Lol, well it wasn't that bad for the entire game but to this day, it's still the hardest game to render

To this day, I'm still a firm believer that it's because of an uber crappy engine. If they let Valve do the Cryengine, you'd get many more FPS out of that game with less GPU processing power.

 

[Lacrosse]

This is my RIG. sorry for bad Quality and low lighting but its my Iphone and i don't have much light in my room.

 

[f22warzone]

um your images dont exist

 

[Lacrosse]

Imageshack - photo2j.jpg

Imageshack - photo3gp.jpg


lets see if this works,

 

[spyrorocks]

AMD Phenom II X4 965 OC to 3.6ghz (Id go higher but lack proper cooling)
23 inch LG lcd @ 1080p
4gb ddr3 g.skill (forget any other details)
XFX ati radeon HD 4770 512mb
500w earthwatts psu
660gb (maybe wrong, cant remember correctly) WD hdd
Antec Soneta III 500 case

I think thats it... should probably buy more ram. Cost about $700 CAD excluding the lcd.

 

[Ash]

 

[ElektroFreak]

To this day, I'm still a firm believed that it's because of an uber crappy engine. If they let Valve do the Cryengine, you'd get many more FPS out of that game with less GPU processing power.

I agree 110%. I just don't get why the game is so demanding when other games with the same level of graphic detail aren't. I think it's to make people think they need to get a better graphics setup.