vitalyx
0
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2009
- Messages
- 294
- Points
- 0
Hi,
I'm new here. Learning about lasers Planning to buy a 150mW green from o-like. So I asked Susie about divergence of their lasers, as I'm interested in a very bright tight beam, not burning. And she said "It is not possible to have infinite focus now". The question was about the "150mW pocket green laser" and "New Style focusable blu-ray pen 150mW". I wonder what that means?
I'm now thinking maybe I should rather buy from Rayfoss? As Faona told me that despite the fact that their lasers are adjusted for burning, as that's what most customers want from 150mW, they can tune it for better divergence. Here is a quote: "If you prefer a tight beam dot we can use long focus tech in design".
Can't choose between o-like and Rayfoss :thinking:
So far I gleaned this info from this forum about them:
O-like:
+ very good quality of diodes
+ better divergence than Rayfoss (but confusing reply from Susie, and encouraging one from Faona)
Rayfoss:
+ 3 nice looking robust hosts to choose from
+ waterproof hosts
+ quality of diodes is also very good, but they say o-like's is slightly better
+ uses CR123 (a plus for me, as I already have batteries and a charger)
But Rayfoss makes inconsistent claims about divergence on their website: "Spot Diameters at 10 meter <18mm, Beam Radiation Angle: 1.5-2.5mrad".
Using this calculator, I found that if beam's diameter is just 1mm at aperture, and 18mm at 10 meters away, the divergence is 1.7mRad. So Rayfoss should claim 1.5-1.7mRad divergence for their lasers, not 1.5-2.5mRad. I wonder if they will really fine tune it for me
Faona also said "For 150mw or 200mW green laser the CR123 battery can last 2 hours aound", but here I read it's 40min at best. Anyways, that only confirms one CR123 is a better choice than one CR2.
Would love to hear your comments!
BTW, this forum is an amazing source of information! :thanks:
EDIT: found a similar post, where lasersbee and matrixcs suggest both companies are good, hmm, still thinking... :thinking:
I'm new here. Learning about lasers Planning to buy a 150mW green from o-like. So I asked Susie about divergence of their lasers, as I'm interested in a very bright tight beam, not burning. And she said "It is not possible to have infinite focus now". The question was about the "150mW pocket green laser" and "New Style focusable blu-ray pen 150mW". I wonder what that means?
I'm now thinking maybe I should rather buy from Rayfoss? As Faona told me that despite the fact that their lasers are adjusted for burning, as that's what most customers want from 150mW, they can tune it for better divergence. Here is a quote: "If you prefer a tight beam dot we can use long focus tech in design".
Can't choose between o-like and Rayfoss :thinking:
So far I gleaned this info from this forum about them:
O-like:
+ very good quality of diodes
+ better divergence than Rayfoss (but confusing reply from Susie, and encouraging one from Faona)
Rayfoss:
+ 3 nice looking robust hosts to choose from
+ waterproof hosts
+ quality of diodes is also very good, but they say o-like's is slightly better
+ uses CR123 (a plus for me, as I already have batteries and a charger)
But Rayfoss makes inconsistent claims about divergence on their website: "Spot Diameters at 10 meter <18mm, Beam Radiation Angle: 1.5-2.5mrad".
Using this calculator, I found that if beam's diameter is just 1mm at aperture, and 18mm at 10 meters away, the divergence is 1.7mRad. So Rayfoss should claim 1.5-1.7mRad divergence for their lasers, not 1.5-2.5mRad. I wonder if they will really fine tune it for me
Faona also said "For 150mw or 200mW green laser the CR123 battery can last 2 hours aound", but here I read it's 40min at best. Anyways, that only confirms one CR123 is a better choice than one CR2.
Would love to hear your comments!
BTW, this forum is an amazing source of information! :thanks:
EDIT: found a similar post, where lasersbee and matrixcs suggest both companies are good, hmm, still thinking... :thinking:
Last edited: