I think You could classify a Black Hole as an Anti-Laser.
A black hole even classifies as an anti-EVERYTHING.I think You could classify a Black Hole as an Anti-Laser.
In case of the anti-laser there is a gain medium with a gain smaller than 1, so actually a loss, the opposite of a laser. And instead of having coherent output the output is cancelled by destructive interference, a coherent output out of phase.
But if you read how the do it it's a lot less exciting. Just point the same laser at two opposite sites of a lossy medium.
HIMNL9 You would have to use 4 White Holes to contain the black hole. I can see the major drawbacks to this approach.
1) Finding 4 White Holes
2) Moving said holes to black hole location.
3) relocating the whole cluster F to a convenient location for use.
Did I miss anything major?
I think You could classify a Black Hole as an Anti-Laser.
On the plus side, it will absorb the actual laser unit, together with the laserist, cancelling the beam (and any possible future beaming) permanently
Take it a step further and make it so it traps the wave pattern as potential energy that can be released on demand, you could build everything from a photonic memory chip for a quantum computer to a working star-trek style phaser.