SMIDSY
0
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2008
- Messages
- 881
- Points
- 0
Not trying to cause offense, I picked some random places!
make your opinions heard for other!
make your opinions heard for other!
LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods
Links below open in new window
ArcticMyst Security by Avery
If you had one nuke where would you send it?
- Thread starter SMIDSY
- Start date
diachi
0
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2008
- Messages
- 9,700
- Points
- 113
I'd just throw a dart at a map and find out that way , and if it hits where I am then tough 
JLSE
1
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Messages
- 3,580
- Points
- 0
SMIDSY said:
LOL, I didnt know Texas was a country :-/
SMIDSY
0
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2008
- Messages
- 881
- Points
- 0
it is now :-D
JLSE
1
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Messages
- 3,580
- Points
- 0
SMIDSY said:
[smiley=evil.gif]NUKE EM!!!!! [smiley=evil.gif]
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2007
- Messages
- 977
- Points
- 0
If?!? Who says I don't have one? Using a nuclear weapon does not give one power. What gives one power is the threat of using a nuclear weapon. I can only use it in one place BUT I can threaten all of them. Now that's power. ;D
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2008
- Messages
- 3,182
- Points
- 48
snowbound or construct I hate those levels
oh yea those are halo places sorry :-?
oh yea those are halo places sorry :-?
JLSE
1
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Messages
- 3,580
- Points
- 0
FrothyChimp said:
I agree to a point with that one. On the other hand if people didnt know of the true horror of using one on people, the threat would not have the same impact. Watching a film such as 'Trinity above and beyond' certainly did not have the impact in my mind that the sight of children wondering aimlessly, blackened and chared did. Never the less, I think it disturbes me more that such power is not in the hands of the people, but of those who control them. In the case of "super powers" like the US, the larger the flock of sheep the more dangerous it all becomes.
Either way, I am proud to be Canadian. We get pushed around from time to time, but at the end of the day we have our peace of mind. I am glad to live in a country who hasnt spent more money on weapons than their own people. We do not belong to the A-Bomb club, but the suject still facinates me
john_lawson said:
haha, snowbound's cool, consturct is great imo, you just have to know what not to do:
snowbound: don't try to shoot/beat down guy holding shot gun hiding on other side of shield, find another opponent.
construct: don't take the main lift, walk around backwards so you can blast the guy lurking with a sword.
Back on topic,
nuke? damn! I agree with Frothy. You threaten everybody, then you nuke the ocean. ;D
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2007
- Messages
- 977
- Points
- 0
wannaburn said:I agree to a point with that one. On the other hand if people didnt know of the true horror of using one on people, the threat would not have the same impact. Watching a film such as 'Trinity above and beyond' certainly did not have the impact in my mind that the sight of children wondering aimlessly, blackened and chared did. Never the less, I think it disturbes me more that such power is not in the hands of the people, but of those who control them. In the case of "super powers" like the US, the larger the flock of sheep the more dangerous it all becomes.
Either way, I am proud to be Canadian. We get pushed around from time to time, but at the end of the day we have our peace of mind. I am glad to live in a country who hasnt spent more money on weapons than their own people. We do not belong to the A-Bomb club, but the suject still facinates me
Well as a member of NATO, Canada has no real need to spend resources in nuclear weapons development. Should Canada be attacked, there are 25 other nations bound by treaty to defend Canada. Plus the relationship with the U.S. in areas such as NORAD really brings Canada within the defense sphere of U.S. nuclear response should Canada be attacked.
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2007
- Messages
- 977
- Points
- 0
Maybe my inner geek is showing but I think it would be cool to have a sphere of plutonium sitting on my mantle. Someone may ask, "Wow is that a steel ball bearing? It's freakin' heavy!" To which I would reply, "No, actually that's the plutonium core from the primary of a thermonuclear weapon."
In my best John Travolta voice: "Please do not drop the core of the thermonuclear weapon!"
In my best John Travolta voice: "Please do not drop the core of the thermonuclear weapon!"
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2007
- Messages
- 977
- Points
- 0
PU-239 weapons material is an alpha emitter so there is no radiation danger as your skin will stop alpha particles. The danger comes in two forms, however, both from internal exposure. Internal organs can be irradiated if you ingest plutonium or it gets absorbed through the skin. The other danger is heavy metal poisoning with symptoms as any other heavy metal poisoning.
JLSE
1
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Messages
- 3,580
- Points
- 0
LOL, unless cars can be fueled with Maple syrop or bacon, I dont think there will be concern for us getting attacked Pardon my trust issues :
It is nice being covered by the wing of the dragon, there is a lot less to worry about I suppose.
Pardon my trust issues :It is nice being covered by the wing of the dragon, there is a lot less to worry about I suppose.
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2007
- Messages
- 5,410
- Points
- 113
"Don't lick that ball of plutonium sitting on the table."FrothyChimp said:
I'd probably detonate in my backyard if I had a nuke sitting around.
electron
0
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2007
- Messages
- 1,121
- Points
- 48
Wall Street OR DC.
jamilm9
0
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2008
- Messages
- 1,864
- Points
- 0
i said Germany.Just because of wwii .
