It's happening again.

Dr_Evil · Sep 21, 2014

So there is supposedly a second fappening going on. Here's a preview.

:na: For real though, use your google fu.

InfinitusEquitas · Sep 21, 2014

Extreme reminder #2 - Don't take a picture unless you want it to be seen. Quite possibly by people not intended to see it.

That actress sure is a good looking girl

Sigurthr · Sep 21, 2014

Either my Reddit-fu is weak, or it hasn't hit there yet.

Have to agree with you there, IE.

Dr_Evil · Sep 21, 2014

Just do a search for "insert name here." Then select "new" instead of "relevance."

ETA: I wouldn't bother with Hope Solo. I'm not going into details.

Bionic-Badger · Sep 21, 2014

I'm quietly amused that the term "fap" is now going mainstream.

InfinitusEquitas · Sep 21, 2014

I'm always surprised when things I say irl sometimes are not understood, and I need to translate.

The new leak is... interesting

rhd · Sep 21, 2014

I would encourage everyone to avoid discussing this much further here. No need to cause Avery any headaches.

Sigurthr · Sep 21, 2014

Yeah that's probably best, RHD. Though I don't think anyone has slipped the beans directly enough to cause any issues... yet.

Tbh I could care less about the poor quality images (when high quality legit industry stuff is so easy to find), but I do love what Redditors who know photoshop do with them... some truly funny stuff. The pron-made-safe-for-work photoshops are pretty good too.

Cyparagon · Sep 21, 2014

InfinitusEquitas said:
Don't take a picture unless you want it to be seen.

"People should be free to take photos of themselves doing whatever intimate things they want for their own private enjoyment with the reasonable expectation that the internet will not make their nipples the next dramatic chipmunk. The laws governing private property and stealing are somehow null and void when it comes to recreational nudity? These photos were not shared. They were password protected. That is safer than peoples' pants. Where people keep their money and keys and their actual genitals."

-Jon Stewart

Dr_Evil · Sep 21, 2014

Maybe they could take the pictures with a real camera and keep them on something that isn't connected to the rest of the world.

As for causing possible problems. That's why I only mentioned the f word once and didn't list names, the n word or anything else that might be related. Hopefully that would avoid to many search hits.

InfinitusEquitas · Sep 21, 2014

Discussion of the subject shouldn't be an issue. Though I think it would be best if no one posted any links.

Cyparagon said:
"People should be free to take photos of themselves doing whatever intimate things they want for their own private enjoyment with the reasonable expectation that the internet will not make their nipples the next dramatic chipmunk. The laws governing private property and stealing are somehow null and void when it comes to recreational nudity? These photos were not shared. They were password protected. That is safer than peoples' pants. Where people keep their money and keys and their actual genitals."

-Jon Stewart

A noble sentiment, but unrealistic one.

The people have spoken through their actions quite clearly. They care nothing for their privacy, and prefer convenience instead. It is up to individuals to safeguard their privacy to the extent they see fit, and the compromises that entails.

rhd · Sep 21, 2014

InfinitusEquitas said:
Discussion of the subject shouldn't be an issue. Though I think it would be best if no one posted any links.

Discussion of the Ca$!0 subject shouldn't have been a problem either. But even things that "shouldn't" be an issue, can still cause a forum owner to incur a couple thousand dollars of expenses if they receive letters from a celebrity's lawyer. I think that's more or less what happened with the $5k (or whatever it was) that Avery incurred in the Ca$!0 days.

Anyway, just my perspective obviously, but why bother talking about that celebrity issue here when there are a million other places it can be discussed? I'd just let it go if it were me. But I've also been around LPF long enough to know that the minute you suggest people "not" talk about something, twenty other members decide they need to talk about it. So maybe this suggestion was futile...

InfinitusEquitas · Sep 21, 2014

To be honest, I'm in full agreement with Sigurthr that there are much nicer pictures out there of people who actually want to be seen.

That said, I'm somewhat allergic to any form of censorship.

That is the norm in much of the world. The dancers in that video got very harsh, albeit suspended sentences, and another man is facing death of insults to Mohammed... guess we should all just shut up, smile, nod, and don't make eye contact lest we offend someone.

Cyparagon · Sep 21, 2014

InfinitusEquitas said:
It is up to individuals to safeguard their privacy to the extent they see fit.

"guard your money" isn't quite the same as the "If you carry money with you, you should expect it to be stolen" I was hearing earlier.

InfinitusEquitas · Sep 21, 2014

The two are very close.

It's happening again.

Dr_Evil

0

InfinitusEquitas

0

Sigurthr

0

Dr_Evil

0

Bionic-Badger

0

InfinitusEquitas

0

rhd

0

Sigurthr

0

Cyparagon

0

Dr_Evil

0

InfinitusEquitas

0

rhd

0

InfinitusEquitas

0

Cyparagon

0

InfinitusEquitas

0

Online statistics

Forum statistics

Share this page