Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

o-like does not sell green PEN. why?

Joined
Oct 24, 2009
Messages
2,738
Points
63
Since those labbies were originally intended for projectors at light shows, and "rave clubs" operate until dawn, I can only assume that is a continuous duty cycle.

Now I have to email Chuck and ask..
 





Joined
Feb 5, 2008
Messages
6,252
Points
83
Lab lasers are not actively cooled without a reason.
I just as might throw couple of cents here.

Jerry, let us not forget one thing that seperates your engine to diode comparison.

The diodes are proven to last much longer when less on/off cycles are used, meaning each turn-on has an effect on the diode and it's lifespan.
If you were to run one diode for 2 months without turning off at all (active cooling and all other obligatory things umentioned, but they are there) it can make it. One PHR was driven for 6 months here ,IIRC on this forum.

But, if you were to accumulate 2 months of operation with normal daily pointer use, I doupt you would make it.
When a current is pushed through the diode, it is preferable that it is done via soft start. Which is not the case in our hobby, nor in our interest, nor easy (enough) to make.

Conclusion: diodes last more if turned on indefinetly, rather then being turned on/off all the time.

Correct?

EDIT: let's also not forget the termal shock effect, when the diode is at room temp, (cold), and it is turned on, the chip die produces (if I am not mistaking), 120°C of heat, heating up the chip very fast since it is tiny.
It also degrades the diode by some degree.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
17,622
Points
113
Lab lasers are not actively cooled without a reason.
I just as might throw couple of cents here.

Jerry, let us not forget one thing that seperates your engine to diode comparison.

The diodes are proven to last much longer when less on/off cycles are used, meaning each turn-on has an effect on the diode and it's lifespan.
If you were to run one diode for 2 months without turning off at all (active cooling and all other obligatory things umentioned, but they are there) it can make it. One PHR was driven for 6 months here ,IIRC on this forum.

But, if you were to accumulate 2 months of operation with normal daily pointer use, I doupt you would make it.
When a current is pushed through the diode, it is preferable that it is done via soft start. Which is not the case in our hobby, nor in our interest, nor easy (enough) to make.

Conclusion: diodes last more if turned on indefinetly, rather then being turned on/off all the time.

Correct?

EDIT: let's also not forget the termal shock effect, when the diode is at room temp, (cold), and it is turned on, the chip die produces (if I am not mistaking), 120°C of heat, heating up the chip very fast since it is tiny.
It also degrades the diode by some degree.

You are missing my point... I'm not saying that IC Engines and Laser
Diodes are the same...
I'm saying that for longevity the Manufacturer has specified
conditions of use to obtain that longevity in both cases...

Engines = "Normal Use"... "Max RPM"..."Periodic Preventive Maintenance"...
Etc.

Laser Diodes = "Max current"..."Duty Cycle"... "Heat Removal"... Etc.


I'm going to have to disagree with you on that....

Laser Diodes are not Incandescent (Filament) Light Bulbs...
Laser Diode spec Sheets in general give two power ratings...
1) CW or constant power output and...
2) Pulsed power output...

The Pulsed Power output is generally twice (2X) the power
output of the CW rating... meaning that ~twice the current
can be pumped into the Die at High frequency (turning OFF
and ON)... with la short ON Duty Cycle

Laser Diodes are designed to be pulsed or no CD or DVD Burner
would work...
:eek:

Sorry but your conclusion doesn't hold water... IMHO...:cryyy:

Although I do agree that Slow Turn ON can be beneficial..
When turning on my Labbys I always ramp them up to the
Power I will be using for a Test... I have not yet damaged
a Labby LD in 2 years of doing this... and I'm running them
over their Power Ratings...:cool:


Jerry
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 4, 2008
Messages
1,807
Points
0
150mW pen is the higgest real power achieved from pen style host...
Because of the batteries.

This is not true, go ask styropyro about his X-200. I know it was putting out AT LEAST 170mW.

Also, Rayfoss sell many green pens, and they're pretty much the same as O-like.
 
Joined
Feb 5, 2008
Messages
6,252
Points
83
You are missing my point... I'm not saying that IC Engines and Laser
Diodes are the same...
I'm saying that for longevity the Manufacturer has specified
conditions of use to obtain that longevity in both cases...

Engines = "Normal Use"... "Max RPM"..."Periodic Preventive Maintenance"...
Etc.

Laser Diodes = "Max current"..."Duty Cycle"... "Heat Removal"... Etc.


I'm going to have to disagree with you on that....

Laser Diodes are not Incandescent (Filament) Light Bulbs...
Laser Diode spec Sheets in general give two power ratings...
1) CW or constant power output and...
2) Pulsed power output...

The Pulsed Power output is generally twice (2X) the power
output of the CW rating... meaning that ~twice the current
can be pumped into the Die at High frequency (turning OFF
and ON)... with la short ON Duty Cycle

Laser Diodes are designed to be pulsed or no CD or DVD Burner
would work...
:eek:

Sorry but your conclusion doesn't hold water... IMHO...:cryyy:

Although I do agree that Slow Turn ON can be beneficial..
When turning on my Labbys I always ramp them up to the
Power I will be using for a Test... I have not yet damaged
a Labby LD in 2 years of doing this... and I'm running them
over their Power Ratings...:cool:


Jerry
But they are never pushed to their limits in CD and DVD driver, are they?
You said it yourself, PHR is rated at 40mW max power.
We push the 3x harder!

All I am saying is that with NORMALY and COMMON drivers used around these parts, turn on has a degree of effect on laser diode.

BTW, no need to tell me that LDs are not filament bulbs... as unbelivable as it may seem, I figured it out by myself :D

Also, you can see DVD and CD drives' diodes dying out on you in 2 years or less...
Pointers and general lasers that use diodes also last that long with same diodes overdriven by severeal hundred percent.
I mean, LOC diode pushed to 0.5 A?
It sure was not meant to be driven at that current.


Also, the Pulse mode you are talking about is generally achieved by drivers with good output filtering and capacitance, smoothing out the start as much as possible.

Right?
This is not true, go ask styropyro about his X-200. I know it was putting out AT LEAST 170mW.

Also, Rayfoss sell many green pens, and they're pretty much the same as O-like.
Average Nd:xxx and KTP conversion efficiency is about 25%, which does not mean there cannot be higher (and lower :( ) efficiencies achieved, also, 170mW peak power is not uncommon, neither is 190mW peak in a pen laser, however max sustained power is rarely above 150-160 mW (heat, battery sagging etc.).

But I assure you that you will not see any 200mW sustained average power pens sold (up-to-spec) any time soon...
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
17,622
Points
113
But they are never pushed to their limits in CD and DVD driver, are they?
You said it yourself, PHR is rated at 40mW max power.
We push the 3x harder!

All I am saying is that with NORMALY and COMMON drivers used around these parts, turn on has a degree of effect on laser diode.

BTW, no need to tell me that LDs are not filament bulbs... as unbelivable as it may seem, I figured it out by myself :D

Also, you can see DVD and CD drives' diodes dying out on you in 2 years or less...
Pointers and general lasers that use diodes also last that long with same diodes overdriven by severeal hundred percent.
I mean, LOC diode pushed to 0.5 A?
It sure was not meant to be driven at that current.


Also, the Pulse mode you are talking about is generally achieved by drivers with good output filtering and capacitance, smoothing out the start as much as possible.

Right?

Average Nd:xxx and KTP conversion efficiency is about 25%, which does not mean there cannot be higher (and lower :( ) efficiencies achieved, also, 170mW peak power is not uncommon, neither is 190mW peak in a pen laser, however max sustained power is rarely above 150-160 mW (heat, battery sagging etc.).

But I assure you that you will not see any 200mW sustained average power pens sold (up-to-spec) any time soon...
Of course they are.... :wtf:
They are pushed to the LD Manufacturer's Data Sheet Limit... to assure
the end product (DVD Burner) lasts the longest acceptable time possible
without failure...
Pushing them higher than the LD Manufacture's Data Sheet specs will
void any guarantee the DVD Burner manufacturer has...


Only if an over Current/Voltage is applied.... proper filtering can take
care of that...


No I don't think you do... you still think that turning LDs ON and OFF at
high frequency will damage them....
They were designed to do that... That what DVD burners do...
Again in a DVD Burner the idea is to do a burn as fast as possible..
I can't see every Turn ON of the DVD LD being turned on slowly
smoothed out...:whistle:

My comments above have to do with Laser Diodes used as intended by
the Manufacturer of the Laser Diodes... and the Fact that LDs ARE
rated to be Pulsed...
I would think the designer/Manufacturer would know better about the
required Max parameters of their LDs than either you or myself.

If you want to Drive your LDs or your Light Bulbs over the Manufactures
Max Ratings to get more energy out of them.... that is your choice...
Most of the Members do that here.... That what we do...:evil:

But you are off the mark stating that Laser Diodes degrade faster
by turning them ON and OFF. They do not act like Light Bulbs and
cause degradation by stressing the filament...
The problem is not the LD (if kept in specs)...
If there was a problem it would be with the Driver design... IMO


Jerry
 
Joined
Feb 5, 2008
Messages
6,252
Points
83
I am kind of missing the point here...

The are driven at maximum performance rated my manufacturer. What manufacturer says that PHR is capable of 100mW output?
We are driving them that high, no?

Burning as fast as possible in drives is achieved by using even more powerfull diodes, not driving them higher.

Umm, it kind of looks like that this friendly arguement we are having is pretty much pointless...

I still am convinced that turning on/off diode (complete cutoff) is taking it's tax out of diode's life time... I read it on this forum for Christ sakes' :D

But, if you say that they do not, I have no choice than to agree with you... that is both good news and bad news:
Bad news: I lost the debate
Good news: My lasers live longer with shorter duty cycles and contact clicking on/off (pen style ones ... you know :p )

You thinz teh lite bulbs are not affected? Well, is OK! :D
 
Joined
Sep 4, 2008
Messages
1,807
Points
0
Average Nd:xxx and KTP conversion efficiency is about 25%, which does not mean there cannot be higher (and lower :( ) efficiencies achieved, also, 170mW peak power is not uncommon, neither is 190mW peak in a pen laser, however max sustained power is rarely above 150-160 mW (heat, battery sagging etc.).

I'm pretty sure that laser was 171mW sustained average.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
17,622
Points
113
Burning as fast as possible in drives is achieved by using even more powerfull diodes, not driving them higher.

Bad news: I lost the debate

Excactly....

You lost nothing... there was no debate...
it was merely an exchange of ideas and information...;)

Jerry
 
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Messages
927
Points
18
yes..... it appeared into the shop just 2 or 3 days ago.... mmhhh... but there is no guarantee that this pen use the same module 120/150mw. i don't think that this pen use the same module..........
 




Top