Old 09-30-2007, 10:28 PM #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 0
RWTroll is on a distinguished road
RWTroll RWTroll is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 0
RWTroll is on a distinguished road
Default mW or nm  - Which factor counts most for burn

As most of you know, I am still new to these light sabers, lol

I have a newbie question, it seems mW is noted mostly in power, but what are the factors of nm, I guess this is the wavelength or spectrum of the light ?

What would be more powerful for burning, a do it yourself red at 150mW, 539 nm
or a 400mW > 808nm


I know this question is rather strange, but I am in the process of purchasing a 400+ mw 808nm, but was told the actual power output of them is really like most 150 mw lasers with a lower nm - because 808nm is almost all IR wavelength and thus less power for burning. I mean I have watched pseudos videos of the 400 mw burn and Kenoms reds with a lot less mw seem to be burning as good ! Can someome explain.........


RWTroll is offline   Reply With Quote


















Old 09-30-2007, 10:29 PM #2
Class 2M Laser
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 618
Rep Power: 14
RobTheVIP is on a distinguished road
RobTheVIP RobTheVIP is offline
Class 2M Laser
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 618
Rep Power: 14
RobTheVIP is on a distinguished road
Default Re: mW or nm  - Which factor counts most for

1 mW = 1 mW

The wavelength does not change the power, it only changes the visibility.
RobTheVIP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2007, 10:39 PM #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 0
RWTroll is on a distinguished road
RWTroll RWTroll is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 0
RWTroll is on a distinguished road
Default Re: mW or nm  - Which factor counts most for

Wow! It can't be any simpler than that..... lol thanks 'RobTheVIP'
RWTroll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2007, 10:46 PM #4
Class 2 Laser
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 289
Rep Power: 13
nes_ds is on a distinguished road
nes_ds nes_ds is offline
Class 2 Laser
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 289
Rep Power: 13
nes_ds is on a distinguished road
Default Re: mW or nm  - Which factor counts most for

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobTheVIP
1 mW = 1 mW

The wavelength does not change the power, it only changes the visibility.
To add to ROB's post, there is one thing else that wavelength differs, and that's how small the dot can be focused, it doesn't matter much for visible lasers. It's pretty simple to understand, 532nm can be focused to a 522nm(nano-meter), once it reaches a beam diameter of 532nm, if begins to spread out again, or diverge. This is why Blu-ray(405nm) disk can hold much more then DVD's(650nm).

nes_ds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2007, 11:02 PM #5
Class 3R Laser
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,032
Rep Power: 32
pseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud of
pseudonomen137 pseudonomen137 is offline
Class 3R Laser
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,032
Rep Power: 32
pseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud of
Default Re: mW or nm *- Which factor counts most for burn

THe other factor is that different things absorb power differently. mW is absolute - it tells you how much power there is in the beam regardless of the nm. However, most black rubber is very good at absorbing 808nm, whereas red items are likely to absorb little 808nm, meaning they will not burn well. Just like its easier to pop a red or black balloon with a green laser than a green balloon.

For some reason though, the misconception that mWs of 808nm are less powerful than mWs of 532nm is rampant on places like YouTube. Since its a widespread belief on youtube, we know its wrong.
pseudonomen137 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2007, 11:05 PM #6
Class 3R Laser
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,142
Rep Power: 1114
ixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond repute
ixfd64 ixfd64 is offline
Class 3R Laser
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,142
Rep Power: 1114
ixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond reputeixfd64 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: mW or nm *- Which factor counts most for burn

When I was young, I used to think that lasers with smaller wavelengths burned better. :P
__________________

"5 mW" 405 nm eBay pen
Wicked Lasers Core
Wicked Lasers Executive Series - Advanced
Wicked Lasers 200 mW Spyder I Pro
Lots of generic red laser pointers

Check out my laser media here.
ixfd64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 07:20 AM #7
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 0
benthegeek is on a distinguished road
benthegeek benthegeek is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 0
benthegeek is on a distinguished road
Default Re: mW or nm  - Which factor counts most for

Shorter wavelengths have more photon energy, so a certain number of blue photons will be more powerfull than the same number of red photons. In reality though, this difference is quite small when you tap it on the end of a bazillion photons that are emitted from any laser each second. Power becomes the ultimate factor.

You can do the math.

Photon Energy (Jouls)= Plancks Constant (Joul Seconds) x Frequency (Hertz)

Frequency (Hertz) = Speed of Light (Meters per Second) / Wavelength (Meters)

Power (Watts) = Total Energy (Jouls) / Time (Seconds)

Now, put Photon Energy into Total Energy, knowing that:

Total Energy = Number * Photon Energy

Where Number is the number of photons that are emitted in the Time so

Power (Watts) = [Number x Plancks Constant (Joul Seconds) x Frequency (Hertz)] / Time (Seconds)

Putting in the second equation,

Power (Watts) = [Number x Plancks Constant (Joul Seconds) x Speed of Light (Meters per Second)] / [Time (Seconds) x Wavelength(Meters)]

For the same power, you need less photons (Number) to make up for the decrease in Wavelength

I'de elaborate more, with a graph, but I have to attend a advanced screening of Kingdom. Movies trump math
benthegeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply





Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



























Privacy Policy | Advertising Disclaimer | Terms of Use


 


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:51 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO
Privacy Policy | Advertising Disclaimer | Terms of Use
Copyright (C) 2017 Laser Pointer Forums, LLC