Old 10-08-2007, 10:42 PM #1
solar00's Avatar
Class 1M Laser
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 160
Rep Power: 14
solar00 is a jewel in the roughsolar00 is a jewel in the roughsolar00 is a jewel in the rough
solar00 solar00 is offline
Class 1M Laser
solar00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 160
Rep Power: 14
solar00 is a jewel in the roughsolar00 is a jewel in the roughsolar00 is a jewel in the rough
Default Lowest possible divergence

Just curious, but what is the lowest possible divergence that can be archieved today (and in theory)
I know perfect divergence (which is actually no divergence at all)isn't possible due to limitations by the laws of physics.



solar00 is offline   Reply With Quote


















Old 10-08-2007, 10:50 PM #2
Class 3R Laser
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,032
Rep Power: 32
pseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud of
pseudonomen137 pseudonomen137 is offline
Class 3R Laser
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,032
Rep Power: 32
pseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud of
Default Re: Lowest possible divergence

Its actually dependent on the beam diameter. Theoretically, with an infinitely large beam diameter you could have no divergence. The smaller you make the beam though, or the less coherent, or the longer wavelength, the more it diverges.
pseudonomen137 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2007, 01:00 AM #3
Class 3R Laser
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,409
Rep Power: 70
laserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond repute
laserterd laserterd is offline
Class 3R Laser
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,409
Rep Power: 70
laserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond reputelaserterd has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Lowest possible divergence

well the pulsars divergance is in the negatives right? so negative infinity would be the lowest i think... which isnt really possible yet. negative divergance means it gets small first, then gets bigger. i think on the pulsar the focul point is like 18 feet or something.
laserterd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2007, 10:45 AM #4
Class 3R Laser
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,032
Rep Power: 32
pseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud of
pseudonomen137 pseudonomen137 is offline
Class 3R Laser
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,032
Rep Power: 32
pseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud of
Default Re: Lowest possible divergence

Quote:
Originally Posted by laserterd
well the pulsars divergance is in the negatives right? so negative infinity would be the lowest i think... which isnt really possible yet. negative divergance means it gets small first, then gets bigger. i think on the pulsar the focul point is like 18 feet or something.
Negative and positive divergence are the exact same thing. If you look at a diverging beam and trace it the other way, its a converging beam. In either case, the rate of divergence will end up the same (if it converges at a certain rate, past the focal point it will diverge at that rate). So whether you're approaching it from a number you're calling negative or positive, the lowest divergence to strive for is 0mRad - nothing at the infinites.
pseudonomen137 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2007, 03:13 PM #5
solar00's Avatar
Class 1M Laser
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 160
Rep Power: 14
solar00 is a jewel in the roughsolar00 is a jewel in the roughsolar00 is a jewel in the rough
solar00 solar00 is offline
Class 1M Laser
solar00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 160
Rep Power: 14
solar00 is a jewel in the roughsolar00 is a jewel in the roughsolar00 is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Lowest possible divergence

Shouldn't it be possible to create a beam with.. say a diameter of 1mm with a divergence of 0,01mrad for example or even lower.(through air)
Can something like this be done with a wavelength between 400 and 700nm.
Or is there some (simplified) way to calculate this?

I mean calculating the minimum divergence just by filling in a few variables (diameter, wavelength, density and refraction index of the medium the beam passes through)






solar00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2007, 03:22 PM #6
likewhat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
likewhat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Lowest possible divergence

Far field divergence has a simple form for a gaussian beam

Divergence (defined as half angle) = wavelength/Pi/minimum spot size (e^-2 radius)

  Reply With Quote
Reply





Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



























Privacy Policy | Advertising Disclaimer | Terms of Use


 


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:49 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO
Privacy Policy | Advertising Disclaimer | Terms of Use
Copyright (C) 2017 Laser Pointer Forums, LLC