Old 03-11-2011, 01:52 AM #1
rhd's Avatar
rhd rhd is offline
Class 4 Laser
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,492
Rep Power: 108508
rhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond repute
rhd rhd is offline
Class 4 Laser
rhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,492
Rep Power: 108508
rhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond repute
Default Clarify the "dot viewing" fear?

I'd love some clarification on this point - why do some people talk about dangers associated with viewing the dot of a high powered laser unless it's xyz number of meters away? Apart from the anecdotal evidence that I have in fact viewed the dot of a laser at closer ranges without any obvious detrimental results, here's my main conceptual roadblock

If the dot of a 2W laser is 10 feet away, hitting a surface that is diffusing the light, why is that dot any different than a 2W flashlight outputting similarly diffuse light?

I can understand obvious concerns with respect to reflections if the dot is on a shiny surface. That's a no-brainer. I can also understand the related concern that if you're viewing a 2W dot on a surface that is 10 feet away, you should have goggles on for other reasons anyway - particularly the danger of accidentally moving that dot across something reflective in the process.

But if we're really talking about the danger of looking at the dot itself, and not these related dangers that have to do with beam reflections, why is the danger any greater than viewing any other ~2W source of diffuse light?


__________________
CURRENT WAVELENGTHS:
405|441|450|467|473|495|505|520|532|556|PGLRG|589|594|632|638|660


SAFETY & IMPORTANT READING (threads authored and contributed to by various members of LPF):
- Federal Aviation Administration - Laser Safety Initiative (link)
- Info release from Laserglow - Default Canadian restrictions on portable lasers (link)
- The Necessity of Safety Goggles (link)


Last edited by rhd; 03-11-2011 at 01:54 AM.
rhd is offline   Reply With Quote


















Old 03-11-2011, 02:02 AM #2
Krogith's Avatar
Class 3R Laser
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA Cali
Posts: 1,195
Rep Power: 54
Krogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond repute
Krogith Krogith is offline
Class 3R Laser
Krogith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA Cali
Posts: 1,195
Rep Power: 54
Krogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Clarify the "dot viewing" fear?

How do you know that said surface is perfectly defusing the light? Couldn't a tiny reflective spec technically shoot that focused beam into your eye? Just my 2 cents as i'm not a expert and just guessing and would also love a Technical explanation
__________________
--Some Pictures--


Click This Link!!! 50 mW Laser does Eye damage from his friend waving it in his face...
"Yeah you guessed it... At school.."-Wear The Proper Goggles for Your Protection-Click Here, Please READ!
Above >5mW you can damage Your Eyes with a Reflection in 1/100th of a second. It Doesn't Matter How Dim it "Looks"! It is still dangerous!
Above >100 mW you can burn your retina off any glossy surface just Reflecting The Beam off to your Eye!It's More Than Just a Mirror that you need to be Careful Of!!
And remember There is Never A Perfectly Diffused Surface, Do You want to Risk it?!
Krogith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 02:15 AM #3
jakeGT's Avatar
Class 3B Laser
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,544
Rep Power: 1352
jakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond repute
jakeGT jakeGT is offline
Class 3B Laser
jakeGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,544
Rep Power: 1352
jakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond reputejakeGT has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Clarify the "dot viewing" fear?

I do now that black cloth diffuses good, but also burns. I would never do it inside a room or anything though, from myroom to my living room is close to 100 feet, and that doesnt bother me, but as he said, I'm no expert
__________________
My Reviews and Threads
jakeGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 03:12 AM #4
millirad's Avatar
Class 3B Laser
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: No. California
Posts: 2,581
Rep Power: 907839
millirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond repute
millirad millirad is offline
Class 3B Laser
millirad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: No. California
Posts: 2,581
Rep Power: 907839
millirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond reputemillirad has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Clarify the "dot viewing" fear?

The 2 watt flashlight is divergent, and the laser is collimated. Edit: the light coming from the laser is also "coherent", and the light light coming from a flashlight is not. Because the light leaving the flashlight is not coherent, the photons collide and scatter easily while the coherent light does not.
__________________
Greenie - 100mw in diy aluminum host
650nm - 260mw in MXDL host with brass heatsink
650nm - 325mw in stainless Raygun host. The dot is so bright it's
PINK/ORANGE!
Thanks Jay! Thanks Drew! Thanks Larry! Thanks Glenn! Thanks Dave!

Pink - 500mW (white w/red , ok not till later)
Please don't dazzle aircraft! You wouldn't hit someone in the face normally would you?
Home of the stainless RAYGUN !

Last edited by millirad; 03-11-2011 at 03:57 AM.
millirad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 03:28 AM #5
rhd's Avatar
rhd rhd is offline
Class 4 Laser
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,492
Rep Power: 108508
rhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond repute
rhd rhd is offline
Class 4 Laser
rhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,492
Rep Power: 108508
rhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Clarify the "dot viewing" fear?

Quote:
Originally Posted by millirad View Post
The 2 watt flashlight is divergent, and the laser is collimated.
It's not though - at least not after diffused by a matte surface.

Again, absolutely no objection to the concerns re: a reflective surface, or any of the valid related concerns regarding using these lasers indoors. I just really want to boil down whether our concerns regarding looking at the dot are actually concerns related to the dot itself, or to something tangential. IE - hitting a reflective surface that bounces the beam back into your eye, etc.

It may be a distinction without a practical difference, but I'd really like to understand whether there is an inherent danger in looking at the dot produced by a high powered laser on a non-reflective matte surface.
__________________
CURRENT WAVELENGTHS:
405|441|450|467|473|495|505|520|532|556|PGLRG|589|594|632|638|660


SAFETY & IMPORTANT READING (threads authored and contributed to by various members of LPF):
- Federal Aviation Administration - Laser Safety Initiative (link)
- Info release from Laserglow - Default Canadian restrictions on portable lasers (link)
- The Necessity of Safety Goggles (link)

rhd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 05:44 AM #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 0
sharp has a spectacular aura aboutsharp has a spectacular aura about
sharp sharp is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 0
sharp has a spectacular aura aboutsharp has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: Clarify the "dot viewing" fear?

I am new to this forum and new to lasers as a hobby, but let me give this a shot:

My understanding about the ratings of lasers is that a 2 watt green laser emits 2 watts of green light from its aperture (regardless of the energy it consumes.) The light then hits a surface, at which point the light diffuses and goes in all directions (which is why you are able to see the dot.) So, essentially, at the dot you have a light source giving out 2 watts of green light in all directions.

How is this different than a 2 watt incandescent lamp? Well, incandescent lamps are rated by how much power they use, not how much is radiated as light. Incandescent lamps are inefficient and give of only about 10% of the energy they consume as light. The light they do give off is not concentrated in one wavelength. Finally, lightbulbs are not as small as laser dots. The energy from a tiny dot from a laser beam refocused as a tiny dot on the back of your eye is more dangerous, because with a bigger bulb, the same amount of energy could be entering your eye, it just wont all be focused on a smaller area.

Lets pretend your 20 watt light (of which 10% of the energy used is now given off as light) was able to give off green light at the same wavelength. (Impossible for an incandescent bulb.) And lets also shrink the 20 watt bulb to the size of the dot, so that when your eye focuses on it, all the energy from these light sources are more densely focused on a point on the back of your eye. The light given off by the dot from the beam of the 2 watt laser and by the 20 watt light are now essentially the same.

Now we get to why it helps to stand back. As you move back from these sources of light which are both emanating light in all directions (not in one direction like at the aperture of the laser; the laser beam has now hit a diffusive surface) less of the light coming from these sources is entering your eye. Google: inverse square law.

But I think you got that. Perhaps the main point is that a 2 watt bulb is not equivalent to the dot projected by a 2 watt laser, as you assume.

As I said, I am new here, sort of new to lasers, and possibly unknowingly talking over my head -- so someone please correct me if I am -- but I think I'm on to something here. I see some differences between a laser dot and a lightbulb which I think matter.

-sharp

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhd View Post
I'd love some clarification on this point - why do some people talk about dangers associated with viewing the dot of a high powered laser unless it's xyz number of meters away? Apart from the anecdotal evidence that I have in fact viewed the dot of a laser at closer ranges without any obvious detrimental results, here's my main conceptual roadblock

If the dot of a 2W laser is 10 feet away, hitting a surface that is diffusing the light, why is that dot any different than a 2W flashlight outputting similarly diffuse light?

I can understand obvious concerns with respect to reflections if the dot is on a shiny surface. That's a no-brainer. I can also understand the related concern that if you're viewing a 2W dot on a surface that is 10 feet away, you should have goggles on for other reasons anyway - particularly the danger of accidentally moving that dot across something reflective in the process.

But if we're really talking about the danger of looking at the dot itself, and not these related dangers that have to do with beam reflections, why is the danger any greater than viewing any other ~2W source of diffuse light?
sharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 06:01 AM #7
willpine's Avatar
Class 1M Laser
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Dallas, Tx, USA
Posts: 171
Rep Power: 1281
willpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond repute
willpine willpine is offline
Class 1M Laser
willpine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Dallas, Tx, USA
Posts: 171
Rep Power: 1281
willpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond reputewillpine has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Clarify the "dot viewing" fear?

I would have to vote yes on a danger. yes on wearing goggles or improve your distance away. First, I would think light behavior from a full spectrum scattered light traveling with different wavelengths behaves differently than laser light stimulated emissions, photons scattering quanta, if you will, some still aligned in monochromatic color with still narrow beams scattering. You ever see a bright light when burning? or when shinning on something black and really look into the dot? It can hurt. I dont know if I am correct for reasoning this way, i hope someone would politely correct me if so. but one thing for sure safer than sorry. You can get goggles with high vlt so you can see the beam and dot easily
willpine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 07:02 AM #8
aryntha's Avatar
Class 3R Laser
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Evergreen, CO
Posts: 2,027
Rep Power: 3388
aryntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond repute
aryntha aryntha is offline
Class 3R Laser
aryntha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Evergreen, CO
Posts: 2,027
Rep Power: 3388
aryntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond reputearyntha has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Clarify the "dot viewing" fear?

Sharp is right, and so is millirad.

While the light is *diffuse* it is still *coherent*, yet uncollimated, Meaning that it is much more easily *recollimated* than "flashlight light".

You cannot really "decohere" laser light, you can only scatter it. The light coming directly out of a diode is just as diffuse of that coming out of a small LED. That same light pattern can be collimated far more easily than that of the LED, because the light coming out of the LD is truly coherent (though diffuse and uncollimated), whereas the light coming out of the LED, or flashlight, is diffuse, non-coherent, and uncollimated.

So I think you were confusing collimation and coherency a little: Once it hits a diffusing surface it is no longer *collimated* but IS still coherent.

The light, being coherent, is much easier to *recollimate*, including via the lens in your eye. Additionally, a nondiffused area (or less diffused area) could reflect a semi-collimated beam.

Adding to this is the fact that a 2W laser is 2W of light output, and a 2W flashlight is 2W of LED consumption; much of this (even in the case of LEDs) is lost through filters, phosphor layers, inefficient reflectors and of course heat. 2W of laser light is 2W of light. So you're talking a lot more power actually coming out of the aperture.
__________________

3392nm:REO LHIP HeNe 2mW ∙ 980nm:OLIKE 155mW

808nm:OLIKE 200mW ∙ JETL PLC 600mW(682pk)
780nm:OLIKE 120mW
685nm:18650 47mW
671nm:PGL3M 281mW DPSS ∙ PGL3C 278mW
655nm:OLIKE 221mW ∙ Yob 320mW
638nm:Sanyo 40mW ∙ HL63133 200mW ∙ PGL3C 463mWpk ∙ ML520 700mW
633nm:JDS1145 HeNe 28mW ∙ JDS1145 HeNe 26mW
612nm:MG 05LOR151 HeNe 3mW ∙ REO LSTP 3mW
609nm:REO LHOR 1mW
604nm:REO LSTP 2mW
594nm:Rigel 3mW ∙ PGL3C 15mWpk ∙ Lasos 7512 3mW ∙ CNI MGL3 58mWpk
589nm:CNI PGL3C 106mW ∙ CNI PGL3C 85mW
575nm:Shenzen Opto 30mW
561nm:CNI PGL3C 30mW(41pk)
556nm:CNI PGL3C 20mW(22pk)
544nm:JDS1675P HeNe 2mW ∙ REO LHGR 2mW ∙ Lasos 7786 2mW
532nm:PGL3C 150mW(180pk) ∙ PGL3C 578mWpk ∙ PLC 440mWpk
515nm:JDS 221420GL ArI 30mW
510nm:52mW DG#2 ∙ 50mW 26650 DG
488nm:Nlx DPSS 7mW ∙ JDS 2214 ArI 40mW ∙ JDS FCD488 DPSS 25mW
ML:MG 65A106025 ArI ML 115mW
476/480nm:Nichia DDD 28mW
473nm:PGL3A 45mW(80pk) ∙ PGL3C 110mWpk ∙ PGL3C 95mWpk
465nm:DTR NDB7676 2.03w
458nm:JDS 2214VL 8mW ∙ JDS 2214VL 12mW ∙ RHD Diode 1.7W
452nm:Osram SM 47mW
445nm:Yob 1410mW ∙ PGL3C 1200mW ∙ DTR-EHG 32650 2136mW
405nm:Yob 630mW ∙ Qfox 750mW ∙ JETL PLC 780mW
aryntha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 01:00 PM #9
rhd's Avatar
rhd rhd is offline
Class 4 Laser
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,492
Rep Power: 108508
rhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond repute
rhd rhd is offline
Class 4 Laser
rhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,492
Rep Power: 108508
rhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond reputerhd has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Clarify the "dot viewing" fear?

Ok - I'm starting to come over to your side of the fence.

Having said that, we can still talk about LED emitters like the XM-L etc, where they're gobbling up 12W. I'm certain that, like an LD, we're getting at lease 2W of actual light production (if not, then LEDs are incredibly inefficient!)

My remaining conceptual hesitation is this -

2W focussed on a single dot, 10 feet away.

- By the time you're 10 feet away, you've got the equivalent of less than a mW beam even hitting your eye. Even if it IS still coherent light, that your eye can re-collimate, why would that be any worse than a 0.5 mW pointer beam hitting your eye directly?
__________________
CURRENT WAVELENGTHS:
405|441|450|467|473|495|505|520|532|556|PGLRG|589|594|632|638|660


SAFETY & IMPORTANT READING (threads authored and contributed to by various members of LPF):
- Federal Aviation Administration - Laser Safety Initiative (link)
- Info release from Laserglow - Default Canadian restrictions on portable lasers (link)
- The Necessity of Safety Goggles (link)

rhd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 01:03 PM #10
DrSid's Avatar
Class 3R Laser
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Olomouc, Czech Republic
Posts: 1,516
Rep Power: 154
DrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond repute
DrSid DrSid is offline
Class 3R Laser
DrSid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Olomouc, Czech Republic
Posts: 1,516
Rep Power: 154
DrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond reputeDrSid has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Clarify the "dot viewing" fear?

Generally smaller the light source is, more dangerous it is, as it can be focused into smaller point on the retina. Laser dot is very small. Light from 2W LED flashlight is several times bigger, as plenty of the energy comes from the reflector. Still 2W LED flashlight is pretty painful to look at.
__________________
200mw (35mw compared) FocalPrice cheap green AA - Review
500mw (estimated) 445nm Minimalistic Orange Emos Direct Drive. Thread
1500mw (estimated) 445nm Jayrob's Solarforce L2P. Review
DrSid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 04:48 PM #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 0
sharp has a spectacular aura aboutsharp has a spectacular aura about
sharp sharp is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 0
sharp has a spectacular aura aboutsharp has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: Clarify the "dot viewing" fear?

I think 2W, 10 feet is an oversimplification of the problem. There are more variables at work here:

- wavelength. see https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikiped...e-light_hazard
- whether there is non-visible emitted light, such as IR from some green lasers
- pulsed vs CW (pulsed being more dangerous)

-sharp
sharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 06:14 PM #12
123splat's Avatar
Class 2 Laser
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 428
Rep Power: 60
123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute
123splat 123splat is offline
Class 2 Laser
123splat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 428
Rep Power: 60
123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Clarify the "dot viewing" fear?

What about the issue of back-scatter? You are not only getting the reflection of the dot (which is why you can see that there is a dot), but also the reflected light of the glow (halo) around the dot. The way we see things ig by our eyes capturing the reflected light from the object observed. The back-scatter is more widely spread and so deminishes more over distance (kinda' like gravity). Not So?
123splat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 06:32 PM #13
Trevor's Avatar
Class 3B Laser
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 4,510
Rep Power: 125796
Trevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond repute
Trevor Trevor is offline
Class 3B Laser
Trevor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 4,510
Rep Power: 125796
Trevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond reputeTrevor has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Clarify the "dot viewing" fear?

Here's a thread I posted about this way back in the day; might help you out:

http://laserpointerforums.com/f53/la...ger-43384.html

-Trevor
__________________
Code:
23:10 <ARG>    nothing has blown up yet :)
23:10 <Trevor> that is a distressingly low standard for success
Trevor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2011, 04:06 PM #14
123splat's Avatar
Class 2 Laser
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 428
Rep Power: 60
123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute
123splat 123splat is offline
Class 2 Laser
123splat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 428
Rep Power: 60
123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute123splat has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Clarify the "dot viewing" fear?

So, what is the end result (Beyond speculation)? The math presented tends to soften the issue some, but not entirely. The common sense 'If it hurts, don't do it' seemd most logical, but then there is the retort that 'if it hurts, the damage is already done'.
If beam reflection is more a concern than back-scatter, not much (if any) mention if 'angle of reflection equals angle of incidence' . IE: it may not be your eyes hurting....as opposed to someone else's.

Last edited by 123splat; 03-15-2011 at 04:24 PM. Reason: whose eyes may get hurt
123splat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2011, 04:17 PM #15
Krogith's Avatar
Class 3R Laser
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA Cali
Posts: 1,195
Rep Power: 54
Krogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond repute
Krogith Krogith is offline
Class 3R Laser
Krogith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA Cali
Posts: 1,195
Rep Power: 54
Krogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond reputeKrogith has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Clarify the "dot viewing" fear?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 123splat View Post
So, what is the end result (Beyond speculation)? The math presented tends to soften the issue some, but not entirely. The common sense 'If it hurts, don't do it' seemd most logical, but then there is the retort that 'if it hurts, the damage is already done'.
If beam reflection is more a concern than back-scatter, not much (if any) mention if 'angle of reflection equals angle of incidence' . IE: it may not be your eyes hurting....
The Math points out even in the most perfect scenario Your at risk. And so in the Real World Application you would want goggle at all times when viewing the dot close to your self.
__________________
--Some Pictures--


Click This Link!!! 50 mW Laser does Eye damage from his friend waving it in his face...
"Yeah you guessed it... At school.."-Wear The Proper Goggles for Your Protection-Click Here, Please READ!
Above >5mW you can damage Your Eyes with a Reflection in 1/100th of a second. It Doesn't Matter How Dim it "Looks"! It is still dangerous!
Above >100 mW you can burn your retina off any glossy surface just Reflecting The Beam off to your Eye!It's More Than Just a Mirror that you need to be Careful Of!!
And remember There is Never A Perfectly Diffused Surface, Do You want to Risk it?!
Krogith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2011, 07:06 PM #16
BShanahan14rulz's Avatar
Class 3B Laser
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,175
Rep Power: 178381
BShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond repute
BShanahan14rulz BShanahan14rulz is offline
Class 3B Laser
BShanahan14rulz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,175
Rep Power: 178381
BShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond reputeBShanahan14rulz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Clarify the "dot viewing" fear?

12W LED means LED consumes 12W of electrical power.
1W Laser Diode means diode puts out 1W of optical power.

My 10W LED flashlight puts a spot on the wall about 6" around, while
my laser puts a spot on the wall 1/8" around.

My flashlight outputs Po Watts of optical power, most of which ends up in the spot.
My laser outputs Po=1W of optical power, most of which ends up in the spot.

The image size directly relates to the size of the image on your retina. Smaller the image, the smaller it is translated onto your retina. Now it becomes more about power density.
BShanahan14rulz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply





Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



























Privacy Policy | Advertising Disclaimer | Terms of Use


 


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:03 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO
Privacy Policy | Advertising Disclaimer | Terms of Use
Copyright (C) 2017 Laser Pointer Forums, LLC