Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

Best thermal pathway for heatsinks

Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
1,282
Points
0
Hi LPF, I was thinking of designing a heatsink and came upon a question.

I'm using 9mm diodes in a threaded module. Is it better to:

Use only the copper module and have the back of the diode contact the heatsink. This will leave an air gap where the module is threaded:

13347286664_c041fd807c_n.jpg


Use the aluminum back, but the back of the diode will not be heatsunk.

13347286914_c4883904ec_n.jpg


Would love to hear your guys' thoughts. :)
 





Joined
Oct 26, 2007
Messages
5,438
Points
83
I've always believe that the drive casing should be present, because without it, there's an air gap where the threads are right next to back of the diode. I had hoped that some of the modules would be made solid, with no threading, but so far nobody has made them.

Still, if you can manufacture the first option with sufficient thermal contact, it might be a good way to go too.

A better solution might be to get some of the modules from Rick Trent that have the drive case made of copper too.
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
1,282
Points
0
Great, thanks for your input.

I have an uneasy feeling about the back of the diode not touching anything in option two. Seems like a waste not to heatsink the flat part.
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
1,282
Points
0
Whoops, didn't realize DTR was selling them, or else I would have happily gotten those. Wish they were copper though, haha. Thanks for the info!

Couldn't rep you, sorry!

Edit: Are the modules on his website? Can't seem to find them...
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
1,541
Points
83
this helps me too. I think I will have to get one of those from DTR. too bad they are not copper, but rick trent's would not fit in the heatsink I have without being shortened. An Aluminum is much better than nothing, and then no air gap, as B-B pointed out
 

djQUAN

0
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
1,154
Points
63
Whoops, didn't realize DTR was selling them, or else I would have happily gotten those. Wish they were copper though, haha. Thanks for the info!

Couldn't rep you, sorry!

Edit: Are the modules on his website? Can't seem to find them...

I don't really know. I just ordered a 9mm diode and got this. Maybe you can simply purchase the 9mm diode with module and send him a message that this is what you want.
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
1,282
Points
0
Thanks.

Meanwhile, I'll need to make do with these modules, haha.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2007
Messages
5,438
Points
83
Maybe you can kill two birds with one stone. In lieu of a copper driver casing -- which I've only seen Rick Trent carry -- something else you could try is connecting the back of one copper module to the other:

attachment.php


You can use thermal adhesive/grease to make a better contact. Also, most of those brass driver cases have enough threading that if you were to chop off the back, you could use the threaded section to connect the two modules like this:

attachment.php


All it would cost you is a second copper module, a brass casing, and some sort of cutting tool. It'd be much better if the brass threading were made of copper or something better, but it is still better than just air, and would mechanically hold the two modules snug against each other in addition to the thermal grease.
 

Attachments

  • end-to-end.jpg
    end-to-end.jpg
    85.2 KB · Views: 415
  • connected.jpg
    connected.jpg
    84.7 KB · Views: 380
Joined
Nov 28, 2010
Messages
478
Points
0
look at this one the back of diode will touch the 2 part copper heat sink
eBay item number: 321238757565
 
Joined
May 30, 2011
Messages
218
Points
18
I wish a copper module casing was the standard.
¡Viva la Revolución de Copper!
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
1,541
Points
83
@ B-B

for your suggestion, would not one of the modules need to be for a smaller size diode? otherwise, it would not contact the back of the diode right? lets say a 9mm diode is used. would the second module need to be a 5.6mm, or could a 3.8mm work too?
 

rhd

0
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
8,475
Points
0
Anyone know what the rear thread pitch of standard Aixiz modules is? We should make a better back.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2007
Messages
5,438
Points
83
@ B-B

for your suggestion, would not one of the modules need to be for a smaller size diode? otherwise, it would not contact the back of the diode right? lets say a 9mm diode is used. would the second module need to be a 5.6mm, or could a 3.8mm work too?

I'd probably just keep it the same size unless you could be sure that the 3.8mm hole wouldn't cause any shorts with the pins in the back. I'm not sure if the smaller hole would make any different either because the diodes are usually pressed below the edge of the hole in the back, leaving a small gap.

Anyone know what the rear thread pitch of standard Aixiz modules is? We should make a better back.

I think Mohrenberg might know, since he had a GB for some of these to be manufactured. We could use the opportunity to create more solid copper backs too, not just the thin-walled variety like the current brass backs.
 

rhd

0
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
8,475
Points
0
Bionic:
That was my thinking also.

I know that the back thread info actually exists in a post on LPF somewhere - I've seen it before - but it seems to be resistant to searches.
 

djQUAN

0
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
1,154
Points
63
From an email from DTR a while back,

Back threads are M11x0.5mm
 




Top