Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

808nm laser visibility

Status
Not open for further replies.





Cyparagon

Cyparagon

0
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Messages
9,399
Points
113
honeyx said:
Sure i have seen it. An you still claim it´s a single wavelenght?
Click to expand...

I said they're close enough together that it makes sense to refer to it as one.
If I said HeNe lasers are 632.8nm, would you say "no, they're 632.7992374, 632.799239587234, 632.799234875396, 632.7990945432, 632.80012837..."?
Where I'm from, that's called trolling.

honeyx said:
And how about learning about the difference of the two types of a laserdiode?
Click to expand...

There's a lot more than 2, buddy.

"look at it on a spectrum analyser." I did. You were wrong.
"look at it through a diffraction grating." I did. You were wrong.
"But see those wiggles? That's from the laser diode." That's just noise. Here's proof. You were wrong.
"But the human body emits like 3 visible photons. That means laser diodes emit light in the visible spectrum." How you drew that conclusion, I'll never know. You were wrong.
"But this graph has a little spike in the IR" You can't prove that was from the laser, and the diode in that graph is not an IR diode. You were wrong.
"How about this graph?" That graph had a span of 0.0015nm. Hardly enough to push 808nm into the visible. You were wrong.
"Well that can only mean the light is so dim that your spectrometer can't detect it." Well if the spectrometer can't detect it, I probably can't either. And therefore your original claim that the light we see from an 808nm laser diode is in the visible (commonly understood as 400-700nm) is WRONG.

Oh, THEN the backpedaling REALLY starts. "well if I'm wrong about that, then... YOUR COUNTRY SUCKS!"

Laughable. You're not a scientist, you're a politician.

Lesson901.jpg


How many more straw men will you make?
How many more times would you like me to own you?
 
H

honeyx

0
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
377
Points
28
Cyparagon said:
I said they're close enough together that it makes sense to refer to it as one.
If I said HeNe lasers are 632.8nm, would you say "no, they're 632.7992374, 632.799239587234, 632.799234875396, 632.7990945432, 632.80012837..."?
Where I'm from, that's called trolling.



There's a lot more than 2, buddy.
Cyparagon said:
"look at it on a spectrum analyser." I did. You were wrong.
Click to expand...
Is your spectrum anyliser good enough to show it up. Prove it!
Cyparagon said:
"look at it through a diffraction grating." I did. You were wrong.
Click to expand...
DId i say that first? YOU are wrong!
Cyparagon said:
"But see those wiggles? That's from the laser diode." That's just noise. Here's proof. You were wrong.
Click to expand...

You mean you show me some noise and thats the proof? You are wrong!
Cyparagon said:
"But the human body emits like 3 visible photons. That means laser diodes emit light in the visible spectrum." How you drew that conclusion, I'll never know. You were wrong.
Click to expand...

Where did i say "that means"?? Wrong again!! You are mixing things um and making your own conclusions!! Or at least trying this way to discredit me.
It was just an example for visible light even not being detected by a specturm anylizer and the more seen by passing a defraction grating.

Dont remember ?????
Cyparagon said:
"But this graph has a little spike in the IR" You can't prove that was from the laser, and the diode in that graph is not an IR diode. You were wrong.
Click to expand...

Sure i can´t. But can you prove it was not?? It´s not an IR laser but a blue one and if you would take at least a look at this forum this guy was mentioning several weavelenghts in the blue area as he was analyzing a blue diode.

Cyparagon said:
"How about this graph?" That graph had a span of 0.0015nm. Hardly enough to push 808nm into the visible. You were wrong.
Click to expand...

Thats true. Its a red laser. However it dosn´t produce a single wavelenght like you are claiming. It was also not a laserdiode but a gaslaser. However. even if the difference of a gaslaser is really small. Maybe within a few Kiloherz. There have been several weavelenghts, not just one. Again you are wrong claimning a laser emits just one wavelenght!

Cyparagon said:
"Well that can only mean the light is so dim that your spectrometer can't detect it." Well if the spectrometer can't detect it, I probably can't either. And therefore your original claim that the light we see from an 808nm laser diode is in the visible (commonly understood as 400-700nm) is WRONG.
Click to expand...

And you are absolutely sure? Obviously not. Else you wouldn´t say yourself " I probably can´t either"
Cyparagon said:
Oh, THEN the backpedaling REALLY starts. "well if I'm wrong about that, then... YOUR COUNTRY SUCKS!"
Click to expand...

Putting me your words in my mouth wont make things better.
Click to expand...
 
H

honeyx

0
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
377
Points
28
Me too.

:tired:

Just wounder people can´t accept a different opinion. Nothing changed since the church were beliving the world is flat not allowing the idea the would could be round.

Cyparagon said:
Still waiting :whistle:
Click to expand...


Me too. Still not knowing the difference?? Even to lazy to google a bit? If you would know a bit about a Fabry Perot laserdiode this discussion wouldn´t be present.
 
Last edited:
Lotus_Darkrose

Lotus_Darkrose

0
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
1,807
Points
48
honeyx said:
Me too.

:tired:

Just wounder people can´t accept a different opinion. Nothing changed since the church were beliving the world is flat not allowing the idea the would could be round.
Click to expand...

Infinitus wasn't siding with you on that one, FYI.
 
Trevor

Trevor

0
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
4,386
Points
113
This isn't a matter of opinion. It's a matter of science. It's a matter of the eye's sensitivity not instantaneously ending at a precise point. It's a matter of the composition of the laser die.

It's a matter of you not knowing what the hell you're talking about.

Read until nonsense stops dripping from your mouth.

-Trevor
 
Last edited:
H

honeyx

0
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
377
Points
28
Trevor said:
This isn't a matter of opinion. It's a matter of science. It's a matter of the eye's sensitivity not instantaneously ending at a precise point. It's a matter of the composition of the laser die.
Click to expand...

True

It's a matter of you not knowing what the hell you're talking about.


Trevor said:
Read until nonsense stops dripping from your mouth.

-Trevor
Click to expand...

You mean here the nonsense some of you are spreading?
Yes I´m reading enought. But prefer other surces that are more trustful rahther a bunch of guys playing with lasers and thinking they know everything about them. Sure there are for sure also members here really having a clue about lasers but it´s for sure not you.

So you or anyone first tell me the difference between a Fabry Perot and a Distributed Feedback Laserdiode. Then you can start to criticize me. Else not.

BTw. I know the difference and you obviously not.Also to lazy to read about it. But not to lazy to critiscize someone else.
 
Last edited:
Trevor

Trevor

0
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
4,386
Points
113
Okay, let's assume for a moment that IR diodes do also emit in the visible spectrum.

We've had 20+ years to figure out how to exploit it. Where is my multiline laser diode? :(

-Trevor
 
Last edited:
H

honeyx

0
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
377
Points
28
There are already prototypes but not on the marked. There are also already prototypes where the beam dosn´t need an extra collimation. So in the future you can expect diodes where no collimation lens is needed. And also diodes with several wavelenghts being amplified. It´s all due to the amplifiing mirrows and now they found a way how to do that. We just have to wait a bit till this new technology will be mainstream.

Then you will have a laser with a very thin beam and with a very big photon density.
 
Last edited:
Trevor

Trevor

0
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
4,386
Points
113
honeyx said:
There are already prototypes but not on the marked. There are also already prototypes where the beam dosn´t need an extra collimation. So in the future you can expect diodes where no collimation lens is needed. And also diodes with several wavelenghts being amplified. It´s all due to the amplifiing mirrows and now they found a way how to do that. We just have to wait a bit till this new technology will be mainstream.

Then you will have a laser with a very thin beam and with a very big photon density.
Click to expand...

Lasers that don't need collimation? Those are lasers with long cavities, like HeNe's.

Lasers with a thin beam and "big photon density?" That's all lasers, chief.

"Amplifying mirrors?" Hm, that would be all lasers. Again.

So, I asked about multiline laser diodes based on your phantom visible emissions in infrared diodes. You said there are prototypes. So, where are they?

[citation needed]

-Trevor
 
H

honeyx

0
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
377
Points
28
I´m actually speaking about laserdiodes. Not gaslasers. Was reading an article about that a feew weeks ago. But it was german so I have to find it first an translate for you. Will take a look tomorrow as i´m going to bed now. If i find it, i will post it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.




Top