Hahahahaha!!!! I'm talking to Mr spock!!! Thanks for the comparison though seriously. I had no idea. I would have been very unhappy with that purchase lol
LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods
Links below open in new window
ArcticMyst Security by Avery
Hello everyone new here, with a question
- Thread starter gtr14
- Start date
Hahahahaha!!!! I'm talking to Mr spock!!! Thanks for the comparison though seriously. I had no idea. I would have been very unhappy with that purchase lol
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2015
- Messages
- 9,907
- Points
- 113
This would be a lot brighter. Click the link below.
MX Power 103B 3W CREE XR E 200 Lumens Green on Off Lamp LED Flashlight Torch New | eBay
This laser genetics is a weak green flashlight, it is extremely watered down, 20mw spread out that wide would look very puny.
IT IS DESIGNED TO CAUSE NO NIGHT BLINDNESS, IT"S SO DIM. You would have thought it was broken LOL.
MX Power 103B 3W CREE XR E 200 Lumens Green on Off Lamp LED Flashlight Torch New | eBay
This laser genetics is a weak green flashlight, it is extremely watered down, 20mw spread out that wide would look very puny.
IT IS DESIGNED TO CAUSE NO NIGHT BLINDNESS, IT"S SO DIM. You would have thought it was broken LOL.
Last edited:
I'd have thrown it out into the front yard and left it there lol. The first light I bought was a $8 ultra fire 2,000 lumen off of ebay. I knew it was junk before I bought it. Wanted to make sure I wouldn't mind carrying one after my instructor turned me onto the light thing. I bought the one that I have now at. Sky Lumen I bought the seraph p60 host with the quad drop in. It has I believe 28 memory modes. Has a light press and release and full click tail switch. Nothing compared to what some of the people here have but it works.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2015
- Messages
- 1,222
- Points
- 63
Actually that is a super powerful laser per their typo = 20MW(Megawatts)... LOL
It should be 20mW
It should be 20mW
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2015
- Messages
- 9,907
- Points
- 113
So it's actually 4 xpl-v6 emitters on a board, that's a lot like the XHP-70 only all 4 of what are basically XML-U2 are wedged together into one spot.
So which one is better? Wouldn't the XHP-70 have better throw or no?
p.s. Our 32 watt diode banks are 32 watts output RMS no kidding real power, where as these led's are rated on the input side.
So which one is better? Wouldn't the XHP-70 have better throw or no?
p.s. Our 32 watt diode banks are 32 watts output RMS no kidding real power, where as these led's are rated on the input side.
Last edited:
I emailed the guy that built it. I'll post what he says lol. You know I don't know a lot about this stuff, I just use it. But I'm curiousSo it's actually 4 xpl-v6 emitters on a board, that's a lot like the XHP-70 only all 4 of what are basically XML-U2 are wedged together into one spot.
So which one is better? Wouldn't the XHP-70 have better throw or no?
p.s. Our 32 watt diode banks are 32 watts output RMS no kidding real power, where as these led's are rated on the input side.
This is his response...... XHP70 is basically 4 XML2 die sitting next to each other for a smaller footprint. This LED is not suitable for P60 applications mostly due to heat and the donut hole effect due to its quad die nature. Neither the XHP70 or a qual XPL set up throws much but XHP70 should throw a bit better but with that donut hole. Diffusing the dome is an option but heat is still the real issue. Quad XPL can sit on a large chunk of copper to eliminate the immediate bottle neck but a XHP70 on a brass pill with a reflector is much less efficient at relieving this heat.*
