Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

TPS63020 Based Driver

Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
1,056
Points
48
I coulda sworn I saw a zener in your design earlier. Now I am really curious... -.-

You might have seen some of my previous boosts not the TPS63020...
I use zener for OVP protection but the TPS63020 already has one built in (tested).
 





rfhv

0
Joined
Nov 17, 2011
Messages
14
Points
0
I added the zener to mine for overvoltage protection. I know that the TPS63020 has built in OVP but I do not know where it limits. If the limit is above 6.3 V then you may destroy your output caps unless you are using 10 V caps. I went the safe route and added the 5.1 V zener to be sure I do not damage my output caps.
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
1,056
Points
48
I added the zener to mine for overvoltage protection. I know that the TPS63020 has built in OVP but I do not know where it limits. If the limit is above 6.3 V then you may destroy your output caps unless you are using 10 V caps. I went the safe route and added the 5.1 V zener to be sure I do not damage my output caps.

As far as I remember it was 6.8V so better use 10V caps ;)
 

HTV

0
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
18
Points
0
Can you publish oscillograms of driver’s work at 0.5A and 1A?

It isn’t a useless interest. The same scheme was published around year ago on our site. Our scheme has big pulsations. Difference is in one chip. You used ZXCT1009 instead ina138.
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
1,056
Points
48
Can you publish oscillograms of driver’s work at 0.5A and 1A?

It isn’t a useless interest. The same scheme was published around year ago on our site. Our scheme has big pulsations. Difference is in one chip. You used ZXCT1009 instead ina138.

I will make oscillograms when I finish it. I am currently waiting on some inductors. No I don't use Ina or ZXCT or anything other than the TPS63020 itself. I don't see why everyone adds current regulators when there is already a method in getting constant current out of voltage regulators and IT WORKS. ;) No pulsations so far ;)
 
Last edited:

benmwv

0
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
1,380
Points
48
I will make oscillograms when I finish it. I am currently waiting on some inductors. No I don't use Ina or ZXCT or anything other than the TPS63020 itself. I don't see why everyone adds current regulators when there is already a method in getting constant current out of voltage regulators and IT WORKS. ;) No pulsations so far ;)

So you can adjust with a pot, and so you have a common ground. :p
 

benmwv

0
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
1,380
Points
48
Well, yeah but I don't like the pot thing :D

True, fixed resistor is much easier to use.

It depends on the situation. If I know exactly what current I want, and can get it with a fixed resistor then they are preferable. But an adjustable driver is more versatile.

If only those tiny smd multiturn pots weren't so expensive, they would be much more precise.
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
1,056
Points
48
True, fixed resistor is much easier to use.

It depends on the situation. If I know exactly what current I want, and can get it with a fixed resistor then they are preferable. But an adjustable driver is more versatile.

If only those tiny smd multiturn pots weren't so expensive, they would be much more precise.

aah yeah I like the MULTITURN option! but single turn pots I hate :D
 

rfhv

0
Joined
Nov 17, 2011
Messages
14
Points
0
My sensing scheme allows a common ground for everything. I use three wires in my design. I predict that using low side sensing you will not hit quite the maximum current out that my driver can hit. This is because the TPS has a feedback voltage of 0.5 V. If you use low side sensing and do not amplify the sense resistor voltage you will loose 0.5 V across the sense resistor. I picked high side sensing to squeeze out every last volt from this driver.

I switched to a 1.5 uH inductor and saw no difference in the performance of my driver.

I have the following scope shots to share. All scope shots are of output current into my test load. One division from the bottom is 0 A. Sensitivity is 500 mA per division. Coupling is DC. Probe is 10X.

Here is the driver's output with 3.68 V in at 2.79 A. Output current was 1.83 A at 4.61 V. Efficiency was 82%. Ripple current is about 200 mA. Ripple frequency is about 200 kHz.

laserdriverscope1.jpg


For this next image the input was 3.85 V at 1.33A. The output was 1.03 A at 3.91 V. Efficiency is 79%. Ripple is the same as before, about 200 mA

laserdriverscope2.jpg


Past 1.8 A, the output waveform gets distorted (probably due to the driver nearing its maximum duty cycle). Here is 3.63 V at 3.20 A in. Output is 1.94 A at 4.67 V. Efficiency is 78%. Increasing the input voltage to 4.2A causes this distortion to go away. Ripple is a little more, around 300 mA I suspect.

laserdriverscope3.jpg


To summarize, I hit 1.8 A out with 3.7 V in with 82% efficiency.

Here is my test setup.

laserdriverscopesetup.jpg
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 14, 2011
Messages
3,816
Points
63
Damnit Foulmist, share this revelation! It will bring about a whole new world of DIY switch converters :p
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
1,056
Points
48
Damnit Foulmist, share this revelation! It will bring about a whole new world of DIY switch converters :p

what revelation :D it's nothing new... I use low-side current sensing that's all :D

@rfhv

try putting 2x22uF ceramic caps on the output and as close as possible to the IC for better stability. If you can put a smaller cap very close the the IC and then the 2x22uF close to that cap.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
1,056
Points
48
@rhfv

Check the Vin, Vout and GND traces if they are wide enough,

Try a different layout with the same components.

Try not to think of how small can you make it - do it a little bigger just to check if the layout is the problem ;)

:beer:
 

rfhv

0
Joined
Nov 17, 2011
Messages
14
Points
0
I suspect the ripple is a consequence of the TPS chip itself and the fact that I am in current mode rather than voltage mode. No value of capacitor can remove the ripple. If you can show that with low side sensing you have no ripple then I may redesign my circuit to have a much higher bandwidth feedback loop. I suspect it will be very hard to remove the ripple.

Either way, I don't expect the ripple current to be any problem. The frequency of the ripple is so high that the diode will only see the average current. 200 kHz is far too fast for the diode to see any thermal shock, etc.
 




Top