Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

FandyFire 2100 & Ultrafire C1 In-Depth Review for DealExtreme.com

Joined
Dec 26, 2007
Messages
6,129
Points
0
I received a FandyFire 2100 flashlight from DealExtreme.com. Two years ago I bought an Ultrafire C1 as per laserpointerforums' members recommendations and thus here is my unbiased review and comparison of the two units:

Disclaimer: This thread is loaded with 23 images so it may take a while to load. All pictures were taken with a Nikon D90 18-105mm f/3,5-5,6 lens, using +4 and +8 lenses for the macro shots. I'm very sorry for the chromatic aberration introduced on macro shots but it's physically impossible to eliminate chromatic aberration. All pics were retouched with Photoshop CS5 and optimized for visibility and fast loading on forums so they may have noise and artifacts due to compression and forced lighting. Beam profile and beamshots were tweaked with Photoshop CS5 in order to show how bright I see the lights with my bare eyes.


Video Review:


(Watch in HD!)
Please comment on the video!



Shipping & Packaging:

Standard DealExtreme EMS shipping, took about 1,5 months to get here (Argentina). No big deal, I can be patient, especially if it's free shipping. The unit was excessively wrapped in bubble-wrap so that's a plus; in consequence the flashlight arrived in perfect condition. No scratches, no marks, no nothing.


Specifications:

FandyFire 2100:

  • Emitter BIN: Cree XP-GR5
  • Battery Configuration: 1x18650
  • Voltage Input: 3,6v - 4,2v
  • Modes: 1
  • Brightness (Manufacturer Rated): 350lm
  • Runtime (Manufacturer Rated): 70'
  • Lens: Glass (Coated)
  • Reflector: Aluminum SMO (Smooth)
  • Size: 11,9cm x 2,3cm
  • Mass: 68g
  • Clicky: Backwards
  • SKU: 90127

Link to the flashlight: Click Me!

Ultrafire C1:

  • Emitter BIN: Cree XR-E Q5
  • Battery Configuration: 1x18650
  • Voltage Input: 3,7v - 12v
  • Modes: 1
  • Brightness (Manufacturer Rated): 230lm
  • Runtime (Manufacturer Rated): 180'
  • Lens: Glass (Coated)
  • Reflector: Aluminum OP (Orange Peel)
  • Size: 13,2cm x 3,15cm
  • Mass: 111g
  • Clicky: Backwards
  • SKU: 14027

Link to the flashlight: Click Me!


FandyFire 2100 Review:

Body & Feel:

When I first lifted the package, it seemed only air was in it. Indeed, the flashlight is very light and very small. The downside to this is that due to its high brightness emitter, the body head gets hot easily. During the filming of the video I used the FandyFire 2100 to light surrounding areas of the Ultrafire C1 and viceversa. I ran it for about 60' nonstop and the flashlight was quite hot to the touch (it wasn't scalding hot but it's definitely not something you would want to hold for long). However, keep in mind that 60' of continuous runtime is a lot for the thin aluminum the flashlight sports. For short (3-5') bursts, the FandyFire 2100 is just great.

tj4lw.jpg



The tailcap is well constructed; I like the fact that they didn't use a spring on it, because all it does is scratch the battery's surface whenever you screw/unscrew the tailcap.

PGEPQ.jpg



GITD (Glow In The Dark) caps are happily welcome, too! Watch out for some rough edges on the tailcap's bezel.

rqrdL.jpg



Now, I know you all want to see the innards of this baby, but the guys at FandyFire decided to use a more secure way to hold the LED assembly and for this reason I couldn't open the head fully. I don't own nose pliers... Although I did try to turn the inside ring with two steel nails to no avail.

WQxZM.jpg



By now you should know that I love shooting macro pictures. This one was really hard to take, the reflector is deep and perfectly smooth.

aSLub.jpg



If you really care about attack bezels, well, the FandyFire has one, but I wouldn't trust it to fight a bear. I'll leave that to Anthony Hopkins.
Some would argue that the threads don't go all the way, but I seriously do not care for attack bezels. I'm pretty sure no one would use a flashlight to stab anything and I wouldn't recommend it either.


QbSrw.jpg



Unfortunately, as said in the video review, threads are not very smooth. However, that can easily be solved with some lube or teflon tape. Definitely not something to cry about.

48iX1.jpg



I believe they could've used thicker O-Rings. Despite their size, as long as they keep the tailcap on (which they successfully do), it won't matter. The purpose of this flashlight is not for you to go diving with it, so even though I mention the O-Ring size issue, I can't complain about it.

42xKE.jpg



Ultrafire C1 Review:

Body & Feel:

I'm so grateful LPF recommended I got this flashlight back in early 2009. The build quality is just amazing for its price. Good design and nice weight (not too heavy, not too light) make for a great grip when you hold it.

49c7U.jpg



Don't like the belt clip? Sorry, but it can't be removed. However, don't worry, it's unobtrusive (trust me, I hate belt clips... but I don't really notice this one). The head is bigger than the height of the clip and its polygonal shape keeps it from rolling off the table.

pAbTU.jpg



The tailcap has a recessed backwards clicky switch which provides a satisfactory "clicky" sound whenever you press it. Did I mention it's built like a tank?

CVfG1.jpg



You have to screw it all the way through so the battery makes contact with the spring. This is good, since given the tailcap's length, it doesn't force you to wiggle the tailcap in order to fit it in the threads.

iOS2o.jpg



Threads are outrageously smooth. Thick O-Rings seal shut the whole assembly.

03Zu9.jpg


HsCaP.jpg



This flashlight is a great flooder but that doesn't mean that its throw isn't enough. The Orange Peel reflector does its job as it should.

OxyN3.jpg



Want another emitter? Want another reflector? No problem! DealExtreme sells many LED assemblies that can fit the Ultrafire C1. Opening the head is easy so light modding is easy as well.

KH8d4.jpg



Size Comparison:

To show their relative size, here are some full body shots:

Puu93.jpg



Both flashlights headstanding (no wobble, no nothing. They have absolutely no problem standing on their heads):


ZQFuI.jpg



If you're wondering, the two of them can take protected and unprotected batteries with ease.


Beam Profiles:

FandyFire 2100:

At 5m:

maJPZ.jpg



At 10m:

I1QNE.png



Ultrafire C1:

At 5m:

3G7xc.png



At 10m:

114mG.png



Conclusion:


The FandyFire 2100 is seriously bright. I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw how far it could go. Due to its size, sadly, it gets hot quickly. However, as I said in the video, the temperature is not enough to burn your skin.
The Ultrafire C1 is a great travel companion. The Q5 emitter is bright enough for a walk in the dark without draining your battery rapidly. Again, this flashlight offers great battery life and an amazing duty cycle.

If you want a very portable, lightweight yet bright flashlight and don't mind relatively short duty cycles, the FandyFire 2100 is for you.
If you, instead, would rather use your flashlight for longer periods of time, hate to recharge batteries and can do with some light spilling, the Ultrafire C1 is your best option. Furthermore, if you want a great host body to mod with a brigter emitter bin, you should also go for the Ultrafire C1

All in all, both flashlights would make a wise choice. Either the FandyFire 2100 and the Ultrafire C1 will not disappoint you in any way, especially not at their low price, taking into account the fact that build quality on both of them is just outstanding.
 
Last edited:





Joined
Jun 11, 2009
Messages
1,252
Points
63
Nice Job!
A review is always welcome from you nikokapo
I like your enthusiasm and the sense of pride with your video and pics.

Does the fandyfire use a glass lens?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 26, 2007
Messages
6,129
Points
0
Nice Job!
A review is always welcome from you nikokapo
I like your enthusiasm and the sense of pride with your video and pics.

Does the fandyfire use a glass lens?

Thank you! I put a lot of effort in making my reviews and I appreciate it when people like them (and when they don't, I make sure I know why).

Indeed, the FandyFire 2100 uses a coated glass lens. It's thick, too, I just couldn't get it out to take pictures of it :(
 
Joined
Feb 9, 2011
Messages
578
Points
0
Wow, looks like a professional review! +1

Does DX pay you to do reviews? Because if not, they should!
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2007
Messages
6,129
Points
0
Wow, looks like a professional review! +1

Does DX pay you to do reviews? Because if not, they should!

Thank you, Jufran!

DX does not pay me to do reviews. However, this is my first review for DX. Let's hope for the opportunity to do more reviews in the future!
 

LaZeRz

0
Joined
Feb 19, 2011
Messages
2,549
Points
63
Nice review! +1

I love your accent :p

I will leave a comment on the youtube vid :yh:

EDIT: what cam do you use? You take lovely macro's
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 26, 2007
Messages
6,129
Points
0
Nice review! +1

I love your accent :p

I will leave a comment on the youtube vid :yh:

EDIT: what cam do you use? You take lovely macro's

Thanks, man, I appreciate it :)

My English is very rusty, it's been a while since I last spoke in English for something serious.

Haha, it seems nobody cares for disclaimers anymore :p:

Disclaimer: This thread is loaded with 23 images so it may take a while to load. All pictures were taken with a Nikon D90 18-105mm f/3,5-5,6 lens, using +4 and +8 lenses for the macro shots. I'm very sorry for the chromatic aberration introduced on macro shots but it's physically impossible to eliminate chromatic aberration. All pics were retouched with Photoshop CS5 and optimized for visibility and fast loading on forums so they may have noise and artifacts due to compression and forced lighting. Beam profile and beamshots were tweaked with Photoshop CS5 in order to show how bright I see the lights with my bare eyes.

Coincidentally, I got the macro effect lenses from DX as well. I hope to someday get a real macro lens, but until then these will do the job.

The video was shot with the Nikon D90 as well and edited with Sony Vegas Pro 10. You wouldn't believe how hard it is to shoot with a camera that doesn't autofocus while shooting video, that doesn't allow you to choose the aperture or shutter speed; ISO and EV are not selectable as well. Anyway, the D90 was the lab rat for video shooting DSLRs.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2009
Messages
1,252
Points
63
I only wish these chinese manufactures would loose their obsesion with using names with fire in it.
so far I have seen
ultrafire
superfire
spiderfire
trustfire
and now fandyfire??
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 26, 2007
Messages
6,129
Points
0
I only wish these chinese manufactures would loose their obsesion with using names with fire in it.
so far I have seen
ultrafire
superfire
spiderfire
trustfire
and now fandyfire??

I noticed the same thing yesterday while I was writing the review. But I really could not care less for the name if the flashlight performs correctly.

Maybe they copy a part of the xxxxfire name to try and catch a customer and make him believe it's a trusted company.

Designs are similar, specs are similar... could be one company trying to aim for every single LED flashlight niche in existence.
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2009
Messages
3,136
Points
63
I've got a Ultrafire C1 as well. Mine came with a very aggressive stainless steel bezel. Unfortunately, I lost the flat lens retaining ring, so I'm stuck with the sharp stabby end. The clip is very useful, IMO. It's a bit heavy to clip onto a baseball hat, but it definitely is unobtrusive. I also like the anodizing on the C1. Feels tougher than the metalic anodize on some of my other lights.

BTW, this light takes many design points from the Surefire C2, and I'm thinking most of the ****fire companies are named that way because of surefire.

Only thing I don't like is the rubber grip ring, but that's just because I abused this light too much and after about a year and a half, it finally wore out and broke. Light still functions, though, and I use it with an old MC-E drop-in as a stun/flood light. Well, not like I come across anything that needs stunning...
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2007
Messages
6,129
Points
0
I've got a Ultrafire C1 as well. Mine came with a very aggressive stainless steel bezel. Unfortunately, I lost the flat lens retaining ring, so I'm stuck with the sharp stabby end. The clip is very useful, IMO. It's a bit heavy to clip onto a baseball hat, but it definitely is unobtrusive. I also like the anodizing on the C1. Feels tougher than the metalic anodize on some of my other lights.

BTW, this light takes many design points from the Surefire C2, and I'm thinking most of the ****fire companies are named that way because of surefire.

Only thing I don't like is the rubber grip ring, but that's just because I abused this light too much and after about a year and a half, it finally wore out and broke. Light still functions, though, and I use it with an old MC-E drop-in as a stun/flood light. Well, not like I come across anything that needs stunning...

I've never seen that Ultrafire C1 with an attack bezel you mention, could you please post some pictures of it? I would like to see it :) Indeed the Ultrafire C1 is built like a tank, it never failed me and always delivered when I needed it.
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2007
Messages
6,129
Points
0
Joined
Dec 29, 2009
Messages
3,136
Points
63
Yes, quite annoying. Esp. the S-O-S-O-S-O mode. So? I changed the LED to a Q3 5A-tint and added some glow powder around the emitter; It's now serving duty in a solarforce L2. Right now, I have a 3-mode MC-E in the C1. It's my blinder/meat tenderizer.
 




Top