Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

Buy Site Supporter Role (remove some ads) | LPF Donations

Links below open in new window

FrozenGate by Avery

Make the veteren's section for users with 1000 posts or 1 year active?

weidmark

weidmark

0
Joined
Sep 19, 2010
Messages
702
Points
0
Hi,

I was always wondering why the veteren's section was based on a post count instead of on a time active basis. I have seen some memebers on the forums will a couple months of activity and over a thousand posts and they still don't seem to know what they are talking about. I have been active for over a year, and although I still have stuff to learn, I feel I could offer more viable input than many of these so called veterens with 1000 posts. Just because I don't feel the need to make a comment on every thread in the forums doesnt mean I dont read many of them and learn from them :).

That being said, has it ever been discussed to change the requirement of the veterens section to be at least 1 year active or something like that?
 
Last edited:





We have discussed making the threshold higher ;)

People post more now than they did when the requirement was set.

Also, in the past, no posts from the 'Other" section counted toward the requirement. With the change of software, we apparently lost that control. That is one of the main reasons for inexperienced members reaching 1000 posts

Finally, there have always been "special invitations" for members that contribute significant, quality info but just not often.

I have always liked the time + post count idea for membership in the Veterans group. Maybe others have ideas as well?

Peace,
dave
 
I always thought the 1000 posts requirement is more of a rough guideline then anything.

Personally didn't ask for a password to vets section until I had over 2000 posts, about ~6 months.

Just pm any of the admins and they will send you the password.

Btw... it's boring there. Horribly boring.
 
It has been discussed before but usually the ideas end up getting complicated and in the end nothing happens. Ideally there would be some balance between post count and time here, otherwise there will be the problems of people getting in too quickly by post spamming if it solely on posts, and people with one post who never contribute getting in after a year if it's only on time.

My suggestion would be something like: 1000 post and a least a year OR 500 if you have been here 2 years or more. Also, I agree that posts in the Welcome and Off Topic areas should not count.
 
Last edited:
InfinitusEquitas said:
I always thought the 1000 posts requirement is more of a rough guideline then anything.

Personally didn't ask for a password to vets section until I had over 2000 posts, about ~6 months.

Just pm any of the admins and they will send you the password.

Btw... it's boring there. Horribly boring.
Click to expand...

So, so true :crackup:

It looks WAY more interesting from the outside than it does from the inside

Peace,
dave
 
weidmark said:
Hi,

I was always wondering why the veteren's section was based on a post count instead of on a time active basis. I have seen some memebers on the forums will a couple months of activity and over a thousand posts and they still don't seem to know what they are talking about. I have been active for over a year, and although I still have stuff to learn, I feel I could offer more viable input than many of these so called veterens with 1000 posts. Just because I don't feel the need to make a comment on every thread in the forums doesnt mean I dont read many of them and learn from them :).

That being said, has it ever been discussed to change the requirement of the veterens section to be at least 1 year active or something like that?
Click to expand...

I think the veterans system is just fine as it is....
If a person that has been here for quite some time and
feels he should be let into the Vets section...all he needs
to do is ask the Admin if he thinks you should get in... I'm
sure he will ask the Mods for advice...
It has happened before....

Take Frothy Chimp for example... he's been here since
Sept 22 2007... and only has 950 posts. If he asked to get
into the Vets section he would surely be invited but not
brcause of the time he's been here but the contributions
he has made to the knowledge base on LPF.

BTW...It is also difficult for you to help the member that may
need it if you don't post...;)

You shouldn't really put all the veterans (1000 posts) in
the same pot... some of us may take offense....:whistle::eg:

EDIT...
Man I need to learn to type faster....:eek:

InfinitusEquitas said:
I always thought the 1000 posts requirement is more of a rough guideline then anything.
Personally didn't ask for a password to vets section until I had over 2000 posts, about ~6 months.
Just pm any of the admins and they will send you the password.
Click to expand...

What are you talking about....
2000/19.18 = ~105 days that's only ~3.5 months....:san:


Jerry
 
Last edited:
lasersbee said:
You shouldn't really put all the veterans (1000 posts) in
the same pot... some of us may take offense....:whistle::eg:
Jerry
Click to expand...

I would expect you to realize that clearly I didn't mean folks like you who have clearly helped members new and old (me included) through posts and i am sure a couple thousand PMs :).

This was more directed at those who have a thousand posts after a couple of months where most (not all) do not even post anything constructive to the thread.
 
InfinitusEquitas said:
I bet the blackhole is interesting though:p
Click to expand...


Oh it is! It is!

For example, the top thread is a rousing discussion about why we cannot see who left feedback right now :can:

Most of the threads there look more like this >>>>>>>:horse:

Peace,
dave
 
daguin said:
Oh it is! It is!

For example, the top thread is a rousing discussion about why we cannot see who left feedback right now :can:

Most of the threads there look more like this >>>>>>>:horse:

Peace,
dave
Click to expand...


The highlight of that thread is it's title. :D Mmm, liger meat. O___O
 
Last edited:
lasersbee said:
What are you talking about....
2000/19.18 = ~105 days that's only ~3.5 months....:san:


Jerry
Click to expand...

I used to post less/slower. I've been a bit of a hyper poster lately:o

daguin said:
Oh it is! It is!

For example, the top thread is a rousing discussion about why we cannot see who left feedback right now :can:

Most of the threads there look more like this >>>>>>>:horse:

Peace,
dave
Click to expand...

Lol. I guess the grass is always greener on the other side. Especially when you can't see over the fence:p
 
weidmark said:
I would expect you to realize that clearly I didn't mean folks like you who have clearly helped members new and old (me included) through posts and i am sure a couple thousand PMs :).

This was more directed at those who have a thousand posts after a couple of months where most (not all) do not even post anything constructive to the thread.
Click to expand...

I would expect you to catch the humor/joke with the use
of (;) & :eg:) and you are very welcome...;)

I knew exactly what you meant even if it was slightly
ambiguous...:yh::beer::D;)

I think perhaps I don't use enough smilies....:eek:


Jerry
 
Last edited:
lasersbee said:
I would expect you to catch the humor/joke with the use
of (;) & :eg:) and you are very welcome...;)

I knew exactly what you meant even if it was slightly
ambiguous...:yh::beer::D;)

I think perhaps I don't use enough smilies....:eek:


Jerry
Click to expand...

Yeah . . . . . That's it . . . . . . Needs more smilies . . . . . . :eek:

Peace,
dave
 
lasersbee said:
I would expect you to catch the humor/joke with the use
of (;) & :eg:) and you are very welcome...;)

I knew exactly what you meant even if it was slightly
ambiguous...:yh::beer::D;)

I think perhaps I don't use enough smilies....:eek:


Jerry
Click to expand...


I am just trying to make myself quite clear to all (especially the true veterens of the forum) that I didn't mean everyone with 1000 posts. The fact that you brought that point up (even though done in a joking way) means that others could take it personally.

I was not taking offense to what you said :)

And since smilies seem to be the way to make a post seem nicer...
:whistle::thinking::san:;):scowl::o:can::)

hopefully that is enough :)
 
As someone who is close to the 1000 post mark, I have to say I actually agree that there should be more then a post count considered. Although I don't think that getting access to a special section is really any indicator of "veteran" status.

I still feel like a newb and imagine I will for years to come. I learn more here everyday and I hope I do occasionally help folks out, but there are still a lot of things I am nearly clueless on. I just like to talk a bunch. :)








<------Look! One more post closer to becoming a VET!!! :p
 
Last edited:
Yep Grass is always greener.
What I would like to see is Seller Rep & Buyer Rep in addition to the regular rep that people can use for any whim.
Any post spammer that also posts some neat pictures or jokes can get Rep & 2000 posts. Perhaps they are also a halfway decent Seller but as a Buyer they are an impatient moron who can't comprehend the mail isn't a teleporter & *gasp* might be delayed once in awhile.

I get as much Rep for amusing posts or comments other just happen to agree with as I do for actually helping people. I would have tons more if I had a decent camera & posted build pictures. But how can one judge if I would be a reliable Seller?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.


Back
Top