- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
- Messages
- 17,622
- Points
- 113
Last edited:
LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods
Links below open in new window
ArcticMyst Security by Avery
What is this? A UFO?
- Thread starter wolfhunter9154
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2011
- Messages
- 185
- Points
- 0
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Messages
- 204
- Points
- 18
JLSE
1
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Messages
- 3,580
- Points
- 0
Its an interesting pic.. I layered the daylight shot over the night shot to get a
little more background for reference.
I appears to be behind the tree line and well above the ground. Also if you look
at all the pics one after the next, it appears to rotate :undecided:
Definitely a cool pic. What is beyond the tree line? Is it a hill or flat land?
little more background for reference.
I appears to be behind the tree line and well above the ground. Also if you look
at all the pics one after the next, it appears to rotate :undecided:
Definitely a cool pic. What is beyond the tree line? Is it a hill or flat land?
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Messages
- 204
- Points
- 18
Its a hill that drops about 100+ feet down (gradual, not like a cliff or anything) then there is another hill across the valley.
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2011
- Messages
- 250
- Points
- 0
A lot of weird stuff has been happening about a month ago I looked at the sky and i saw a white flash in the sky. Also at burning man there was a red dot in the sky that wasn't a plane of a helicopter and looked it up and a lot of people people saw the same red dot.
JLSE
1
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Messages
- 3,580
- Points
- 0
The only thing I find odd with the set of pics is that the light source does not
seem to be obstructed by the trees which makes me think it was in front, and not behind
which would say the object is small.
On the other hand, it was an animal that tripped the cam, which leaves me thinking
a little too coincidental to be faked (no offense
)
If you look at the above pick which I layered, the trees should be blocking a lot of the light.
The branches and leaves are pretty thick. Yet when put into motion, im not seeing the effect
one would expect if it were behind the tree line.
I put the 9 pics into a gif and this is what I got..
What gets me thinking is the fact that it happened to be there, moving, when a coyote
passed by and tripped the cam.. :thinking:
seem to be obstructed by the trees which makes me think it was in front, and not behind
which would say the object is small.
On the other hand, it was an animal that tripped the cam, which leaves me thinking
a little too coincidental to be faked (no offense
)If you look at the above pick which I layered, the trees should be blocking a lot of the light.
The branches and leaves are pretty thick. Yet when put into motion, im not seeing the effect
one would expect if it were behind the tree line.
I put the 9 pics into a gif and this is what I got..
What gets me thinking is the fact that it happened to be there, moving, when a coyote
passed by and tripped the cam.. :thinking:
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 4, 2009
- Messages
- 5,443
- Points
- 113
Could what we are calling lights really be IR and thus be able to pass through the trees and foliage easier ?
It dose seem to rotate and then at time 22:51:58 there is a small light below and to the right of the 7 lights in a row. it would appear to be rising from the ground but that is really hard to say from this picture.
get more/better cameras !
It dose seem to rotate and then at time 22:51:58 there is a small light below and to the right of the 7 lights in a row. it would appear to be rising from the ground but that is really hard to say from this picture.
get more/better cameras !
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Messages
- 204
- Points
- 18
After seeing that, I am more in "unsureness" about what it is. However, I can guarantee that it is not faked. (no offence taken)
JLSE
1
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Messages
- 3,580
- Points
- 0
I dont know if they would pass through and still appear to be unobstructed..
The only thing I can think of is that the source is indeed very large, and the leaves
are far too small to block out enough light from the 7 'points' of the source where it
would be noticeable.
All I know is if wolfhunter9154 is sleeping anywhere near this area at night
I would be investing in a chastity belt, or a sign on the door that states
NO ANAL PROBING ALLOWED! :na:
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Messages
- 204
- Points
- 18
LMAO!! :crackup: :crackup: I may be heading out there this weekend, so hopefully my anus stays intact!
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2010
- Messages
- 2,516
- Points
- 63
I doubt if you head out there you will find anything and I doubt you will capture something like this again. The photos are awesome! Don't get me wrong there but I think this will just be one of those once in a lifetime things. Then again I could be wrong and you have a UFO hotspot in your backyard. I'm sure you wouldn't "only" have these images then if your back yard was a hotspots though.
Real creepy GIF btw.
Real creepy GIF btw.
- Joined
- May 4, 2009
- Messages
- 5,443
- Points
- 113
just in case take along a good camera :yh:
and some Vaseline :crackup:
and some Vaseline :crackup:
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Messages
- 204
- Points
- 18
@wannaburn, thing is, there is no reason for someone to be out there with any lights. No one lives across the street on the other hill. It is just trees.
And yeah, the GIF does add another "level" to the images.
And yeah, the GIF does add another "level" to the images.
JLSE
1
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Messages
- 3,580
- Points
- 0
I look at the fact that the snaps were taken only when wildlife entered the range
of the cams sensor. Had it not been triggered by that close up motion, I dont
think you would have any pics to begin with..
Looking at it from the outside, the motion indicates that if it were indeed faked
(which makes no sense to me on this one) a person making the motion would have
to sit an awfully long time in a tree waiting for that coyote to pass by. This to
me lends some credit to the pics..
Just out of curiosity, how populated is that area, and who else knows about the
camera there? No matter what the answer, we still go back to the fact that
a wild animal tripped the cam...
Very interesting to say the least..
I also agree with what was said above, I dont think you will be capturing any more pics
like this anytime soon... That coyote was in the right place at the right time...
of the cams sensor. Had it not been triggered by that close up motion, I dont
think you would have any pics to begin with..
Looking at it from the outside, the motion indicates that if it were indeed faked
(which makes no sense to me on this one) a person making the motion would have
to sit an awfully long time in a tree waiting for that coyote to pass by. This to
me lends some credit to the pics..
Just out of curiosity, how populated is that area, and who else knows about the
camera there? No matter what the answer, we still go back to the fact that
a wild animal tripped the cam...
Very interesting to say the least..
I also agree with what was said above, I dont think you will be capturing any more pics
like this anytime soon... That coyote was in the right place at the right time...
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 6, 2010
- Messages
- 427
- Points
- 18
@wannaburn, that gif really gives this UFO life. And it does make me more unsure about what it is...
@flaminpyro, the IR idea of the lights is brilliant, that would explain them cutting through the tree foliage.
@flaminpyro, the IR idea of the lights is brilliant, that would explain them cutting through the tree foliage.
