Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

**** the government - wake up people!?

Joined
Sep 16, 2007
Messages
3,658
Points
113
Y'all are so Gullible. Swine flu man made. 9/11 government job, Iraq war governments fault.
Everything that has always gone wrong in the word is the governments fault.
You do know there technology is 50-60 years ahead of what were using right ?
I mean there spying on all of us. Before there were never any cameras around my town. now everywhere i go i see those little security cameras all over the place, we have no privacy any more ! Free speech is no more, you try to voice your opinion and you get put in jail for soliciting.

Watch out for the Thought Police.
George Orwell warned you.



But I did like that book.
 





Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
1,500
Points
0
The presence of molten steel at the WTC site is a well established fact. Molten steel was seen flowing from the tower even before the collapse:

moltenstreamthermate.jpg


photos show molten steel on the surface of the rubble later in the day on 9/11.

MetalGlow.jpg


Three weeks after the collapse, temperatures inside the rubble pile were still hot enough for steel to be glowing red-hot.
molten_steel.jpg


How is it possible for a hydro carbon fire, with maximum temperatures way below 1000F, and actual temperatures probably closer to 500F, manage to produce glowing hot steel aprox. 1300F in the rubble pile weeks later ? huh ?

If, on the other hand, high explosives were used, this is exactly what we would expect to see. High explosives produce temperatures in excess of 5000F and cut through steel "like a razor through a tomato." The steel core columns at the base of the towers were so massive it would have required quite a lot of whatever explosive was used. We would expect the residual heat from those explosives to persist for weeks in the confined spaces at the base of the rubble pile.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2007
Messages
2,007
Points
63
If you can prove that stuff the first 2 photos is actually steel, I'll eat my hat. Yeah, it's glowing yellow, so what? That doesn't mean it's steel in the least. Have you ever actually seen molten metal in your life? Molten steel? No? Ok then, have you ever seen a piece of steel at high temperature such that it's glowing like the 3rd pic? No?

Since you've never seen either of those (I have, by the way, in multiple steel/iron foundries), how the heck you supposed to know what the heck either thing looks like? You can't, you can't prove the glowing liquid is steel, it could very well be pot metal or sheet metal from desks or cubicle walls, it could be aluminum from planes or dozens of other sources of aluminum, it could be ANYTHING.

As far as metal still being hot weeks later, the metal was buried under a building, just about the best insulation I can think of. If I wanted something to stay the same temperature for a long time, I'd bury it under a building, that would work well. How did it get hot underneath the building? Look up a thing called "adiabatic heating" and get back to me.

The presence of molten steel at the WTC site is a well established fact. Molten steel was seen flowing from the tower even before the collapse:

moltenstreamthermate.jpg


photos show molten steel on the surface of the rubble later in the day on 9/11.

MetalGlow.jpg


Three weeks after the collapse, temperatures inside the rubble pile were still hot enough for steel to be glowing red-hot.
molten_steel.jpg


How is it possible for a hydro carbon fire, with maximum temperatures way below 1000F, and actual temperatures probably closer to 500F, manage to produce glowing hot steel aprox. 1300F in the rubble pile weeks later ? huh ?

If, on the other hand, high explosives were used, this is exactly what we would expect to see. High explosives produce temperatures in excess of 5000F and cut through steel "like a razor through a tomato." The steel core columns at the base of the towers were so massive it would have required quite a lot of whatever explosive was used. We would expect the residual heat from those explosives to persist for weeks in the confined spaces at the base of the rubble pile.
 
Joined
Dec 24, 2008
Messages
409
Points
0
I dont think so wes:D
You believe everything on the internet?
Base all your evidence off of videos from YOUTUBE?

:crackup:
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
2,749
Points
0
To use the above picture as proof of shenanikins you need to know when it was taken, when clearing up the mess it is probable that torches were used to reduce the mass of material for ease of disposal.
The front row left hand column looks to me like a typical oxy acetaline cut when the torch is set slightly wrong....

Just my 2 penneth.

Regards rog8811

Edit... a few more posts appeared before I entered mine, refering to the cut pillars in Wes post...
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 25, 2007
Messages
2,007
Points
63
THESE PHOTOS ARE JUST PROOF YOU HAVE NO CLUE WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.

That's CLASSIC brittle fracture, and CLASSIC shear, that's EXACTLY what a strong, hard piece of metal looks like when it breaks. Have you ever seen a strong, hard piece of high-quality steel broken? Nope, you haven't, clearly. Have you ever seen thermite in person? Ever seen thermite poured on a piece of metal? NO, you clearly have not, because those photos are proof of the exact opposite of what you are saying, when someone actually knows what the heck they're looking at. Thermite never touched those columns, those columns BROKE under the extreme force of a building falling on top of them.

If you had any clue about the subject you're talking about, you'd see it. But instead, you trust other people who ALSO have no clue what they're talking about.

You know why the pieces in the first photo are all broken at an angle? Because of a thing we call "resolved shear stress". It matches perfectly. It also matches well that many of the columns are broken on the same angle, but others are not, since it can be a fairly random process.


 
Last edited:

daguin

0
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
15,989
Points
113
@ PBD --

You DO realize that you are arguing with a parrot , don't you?

Peace,
dave
 
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
1,500
Points
0
Alluminum does not turn Glowing orange or red, its looks like solder when it melts

14258294_d98ff1b72b.jpg


on the other hand steel and metal glow orange
gietengecompr.jpg

26781866-foundry-molten-metal-crucible.jpg


Even iron melts the same
ladleflow.jpg


And WTC7 was never hit by a plane but it just collapses ? explain this
 




Top