Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

330V Flash Capacitor Question

Gryphon

Gryphon

0
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
2,238
Points
83
If i were to wire two of these flash caps in series and them apply 600~660V to them would they charge equally? That is, will each of the caps charge to 300~330V.

I know that in rechargable battery packs where rechargable cells are wired in series and charged in series, each of the cells take on a nearly identical charge, im wondering if these flash caps will do the same. What i don't want is one cap taking 500Vs and exploding cause the other one only took in the other 100V.

Just a quick question that i hope can be answered without any headaches :)
 





photonaholic

photonaholic

0
Joined
Oct 24, 2009
Messages
2,738
Points
63
Its not a common practice.

Electrolytic caps have broad tolerances usually +/- 20%

Further if the electrolyte in one or the other breaks down, it can cause a short allowing the full amount to go to the other cap.

I have always chosen caps that were rated above the working voltage of my project.

ever see one "pop"???

Batteries and capacitors are only minimally similar. they behave very differently.
 
Last edited:
Gryphon

Gryphon

0
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
2,238
Points
83
Thats exactly what i needed to hear, i guess i'll just get some ~600V rated caps. I
have seen what happens when small electrolytic caps pop, its nasty! I only asked
cause i have dozens of these caps and thought it might be worth a shot.

Thanks for the advice!
 
D

digital_blue

0
Joined
Aug 20, 2008
Messages
709
Points
0
I hope you realize that by putting two or more caps in series, you get less capacitance. It is similar to paralleling resistors; two same value caps in series= half the capacitance and so fourth.

You would normally put caps in series to archive a higher voltage rating. By putting the caps in series like you have done, you have doubled the voltage rating while halving the capacitance. If you want to get higher capacitance,you should put them in parallel...
 
diachi

diachi

0
Joined
Feb 22, 2008
Messages
9,700
Points
113
As Digital Blue said, putting them in series reduces the capacitance as it essentially makes your two "plates" further apart.
 
D

digital_blue

0
Joined
Aug 20, 2008
Messages
709
Points
0
I would also like to point out that charging 2 caps in series is going to be difficult. Capacitors can be considered short circuits as they are charging but become open circuits when they are fully charged, if either one of your caps charged before the other one, it would essentially stop the current flow through the network and your other cap(s) will not charge to capacity.
 
photonaholic

photonaholic

0
Joined
Oct 24, 2009
Messages
2,738
Points
63
I think Gryphon has already figured out it's not the best idea.

So why keep flogging the horse? it's already dead.
 
D

digital_blue

0
Joined
Aug 20, 2008
Messages
709
Points
0
photonaholic said:
I think Gryphon has already figured out it's not the best idea.

So why keep flogging the horse? it's already dead.
Click to expand...

Since when did "giving a little more info" equate to "flogging a dead horse"? I've read and re-read my posts and I don't feel I'm being repetitive about anything...
 
brtaman

brtaman

0
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
1,199
Points
48
Gryphon: What do you need the capacitors for? Is there a strict 660V requirement?

If not, I have quite a few electrolytic caps, usually inverter grade in the 1000uF area 400V or 450V, if it is a decent project that doesn't require strict 660V i'll let them go for cost of shipping.

450V 1000uF KEMET|ALC10C102EL450|CAPACITOR, 1000UF, 450V, 40X80 | Farnell Republika Slovenija

400V 1000uF EVOX RIFA|PEH200VJ4100MU2|CAPACITOR, 1000UF, 400V, 50X95 | Farnell Republika Slovenija

The 400V one has nice screw down terminals, but is also quite a bit larger. Shoot me a pm, if you're interested.
 
photonaholic

photonaholic

0
Joined
Oct 24, 2009
Messages
2,738
Points
63
digital_blue said:
Since when did "giving a little more info" equate to "flogging a dead horse"? I've read and re-read my posts and I don't feel I'm being repetitive about anything...
Click to expand...

That was "targeted" at no one , I am very sorry if you felt I singled you out.

The additional info is educational to many, and I temporarily overlooked that.

It just seemed at the moment that once the decision was made not to do it, more posts saying it's not a good idea just kept popping up.

However the refresher course on basic electronics 101 is nice:beer:
 
Hemlock_Mike

Hemlock_Mike

0
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
6,309
Points
83
Wellll --- A little old school here. 45 years ago, in ham radio, we often need filter caps for 2,500 volts. The big electrolytics we could afford generally were rated at 450 VDC. So we series 6 of them knowing that the effective capacity was 1/6 of the individual ratings. (Always the same rated caps for this) We also added "balancing" resistors across each cap. Usually 100 KOhms.

HMike

By the way -- these resistors acted as bleeder resistors -- highly recommended in HV power supply applications.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.




Top