Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

Two WL Spyder 3 Arctics Measured

Joined
Sep 11, 2007
Messages
1,121
Points
48
Yes I know it was w/o the lens and that was reported by Dave at 800 something, not in the 900+ mW's range as just posted, thus my question. Seems like some of DIY meters are posting higher numbers.

My review is posted in the review section for the G2, not sure if the G1 review I did is still here, I think it might have gotten moved didn't have time yet to go and look for it.
 





Benm

0
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
7,896
Points
113
i've personally noticed no difference between the output on quality batteries vs. the supplied battery. I'd like to say that this is a linear driver inside this thing but I'm not too sure that it's not heat causing the output to drop down.

I'd suspect the heat... most laser diodes have lower efficiencies when running warm, so that could explain it. Also, some voltage references drop a little when heated up (like using simple diodes as a reference), causing a drop in current as well.

If you want to know which factor is the problem (if not both) also measure the current draw during the reading. If that stays constant, its just the diode heating up - not much to worry about.
 

Kenom

0
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
5,629
Points
63
well, I'd be more than happy to send the laser to you to meter it on your Coherent. Especially given that it's a Nist traceable meter. I could also send my Kenometer and you can compare readings. I don't believe it's off by more than 5-10% which is withing even tolerances set by Coherent.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
30
Points
0
I'm not sure why others have seen such a dramatic (100mW) power drop with the standard glass lens in place. I just received a Spyder 3 Arctic (G2) yesterday (after a short 5+ month wait) and checked it out at 720mW without the standard lens and about 10mW less with the lens in place. Maybe WL changed the lens material at some point...
 
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
2,031
Points
83
If the clear front lens is reflecting right back onto the diode, it could be a heating issue from getting bounceback reflection.

I ordered a lens kit, punched the material out of the silly 'diffraction' ones, and used those "hole only" caps for my arctics.
 

ZapU

0
Joined
Aug 9, 2010
Messages
393
Points
0
I'm not sure why others have seen such a dramatic (100mW) power drop with the standard glass lens in place. I just received a Spyder 3 Arctic (G2) yesterday (after a short 5+ month wait) and checked it out at 720mW without the standard lens and about 10mW less with the lens in place. Maybe WL changed the lens material at some point...

I have both and measured them. The G2 barely blocks any mW (about 8)
The G1 does block almost 100. Arctic has been fixing things as they are reported. Better battery, better goggles, better main lens, better lens caps, better fit and finish, better reliability. Now, if they could just improve customer service. (And get them through customs)
 




Top