Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

Review: WickedLasers E2 532nm "37.5-75mW" [~100mW], from Glenn's GB

Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
371
Points
28

Salute!

This is the review of one of the WickedLasers E2 532nm from Glenn's group buy, which was not unfortunate enough not to pass his strict QA, so here it arrives. Great thanks for this very unexpected (early) delivery!

(Problems loading images? Gimme a shout in the replies!!)

For full size non resized pictures (~4-6MB each), go here

DSC_0510.jpg


Link to item: Laser Pointer Pen in Red, Green & Purple | E2 Series Lasers

As many of you probably know, Wicked Lasers have changed the E2 specs quite a bit since the order date. I cannot remember the original specifications, but I will baseline what I have received to what the official specs claims.


Great thanks to Glenn for delivering this painlessly to Sweden & arranging the whole group buy!


DSC_0502.jpg


Package arrived in good condition. No problems with customs or declaration. Adequate packaging used. Nothing arrived in damaged or even tainted condition.

DSC_0495.jpg


Glenn was kind enough to throw in a little bonus flashlight. Whops. Hope I did not ruin surprises for any other receivers ;-) Neat little thing that runs on 3x AAA and has a built in 650nm laser. :thanks:

DSC_0499.jpg


DSC_0500.jpg


This was kindly donated to my neighbor with two cats. Needless to say it was appreciated :wave:

Specifications

Wavelength: 532nm (~+-10nm), DPSS processed green lasing light
Power output: Guessing our version is the 75mW? Which according to specs gives 37.5 - 75.0mW.
Beam diameter at aperture: Max 1.5mm
Beam divergence: Max 1.5mRad

Size: 18.5mm x 183mm
Weight: 82g w/o batteries. (WL claims 62g in specs!)
Runs on: 2x AA
Claimed Duty Cycle: Continous (!)
Body material: 6063-T6 Aircraft-Grade Aluminum (sounds fancy, looks good, feels awesome)

It came delivered in a black protective case neatly branded Wicked Lasers.

DSC_0508.jpg





Exploring the host

The body of the host is made of a black finished aluminum material. Wicked Lasers call this "6063-T6 Aluminum". When you hold the pointer it almost feels a bit oily.

DSC_0509.jpg


This host has an excellent balance, which is completed by the 2x AA batteries. This is probably one of the best hosts I've held in my hands. It feels perfect.

The front of the laser aperture output is protected by a what looks like AR coated glass filter, probably to protect the inner workings of the pointer from dust & finger prints.

Having this protection will make cleaning smudges easy. This filter does not seem to have any IR blocking properties.

DSC_0517.jpg


This protection can be unscrewed to access cleaning of the colamination lens one layer below.

DSC_0521.jpg


Picture from the other side of the protection filter:

DSC_0522.jpg


Nothing more can be easily removed from the front after this has been removed. And I don't want to experiment with this. :can:

Picture of the laser aperture without the protective filter:

DSC_0525.jpg




Moving to the back of the host...

... you will find a safety pin. Presumably for FDA safety approvals (?).

DSC_0518.jpg


Removing the pin will disable the laser pointer functionality.

DSC_0534.jpg


The safety tail cap can be removed.

DSC_0526.jpg


Examining the inside of the tail cap reveals the mysterious number 11040746:

DSC_0527.jpg


Once removed, the mount of the safety pin construction will be revealed.

DSC_0529.jpg


The safety pin construction can also be unscrewed, in order to insert batteries. The downside of the safety section looks like following:

DSC_0532.jpg




Close up images of different outside features of the pen

Closeup on the warning label of the pen:

DSC_0535.jpg


The E2 printed label:

DSC_0536.jpg


The "Wicked Lasers" printed logo:

DSC_0537.jpg


The push button is very easy to push and firm. It does not click when pushed, but rather have an even resistance all the way down to the "on" mode.

It is probably the best push button I have felt on a pen. I own a Novalasers X-series X150, and it does not compete by far to this 1/5 priced pen. :beer:

DSC_0542.jpg




All components lined up in front of pen:

DSC_0547.jpg




Measurement time!

All looking good for the E2 so far. But will the beam power output and quality work out in it's favor?

Test conducted after loading it with 2x fresh 1.5V alkaline batteries measuring 1.57V each.

DSC_0553.jpg


Preparing the measurement on the laptop...

DSC_0555.jpg


... and the whole setup is hooked up!

DSC_0562.jpg


Power output & stability

Out of 5 runs each totaling 60s, with different resting times and storing in cool / slightly hotter places, I got the best measured values keeping the pointer in a slightly cooler place for about 10 minutes before starting the tests.

po.jpg


Slight peak at 107mW, quickly stabilizing and pending around 98 - 102mW throughout the test. Definitely a pass on the originally stated 37.5 - 75.0mW.

Putting in an IR filter in front of the E2 decreases power output with less than 3%, which is most likely 532nm light being blocked. This is the same IR filter that reduced the O-Like laser with almost 35% power output, which was an unacceptable amount of IR.

It would seem like the E2 has a built in IR filter. Either this or Very well constructed preventing IR leaking. This is pure 532nm powered output. :)

Transverse mode

The dot can at times be a bit jerky quickly switching between TEM00 and TEM01. This usually stabilizes after a minute's use or so.

The dot at 8m is almost a symmetrical circle.

Increased light & contrast on this picture to however demonstrate smudges and/or defects on the colamination lens from factory (beam without protective filter in front). Have not tried to remedy this as of yet.

DSC_0563.jpg


However, definitely a Pass. If I manage to fix the smudges it will probably look awesome.

Divergence

The promised divergence of this pointer was 1.5mRad. This is probably the most qualitative property of a laser pointer. A laser pointer with a high divergence does not feel good using, in my personal opinion.

Measuring a beam diameter of 1.5mm at aperture and 15mm at 8 meters giving a divergence of 1.687mRad. This is probably slightly bigger than I hoped for. I would easily trade the aperture beam size for a smaller divergence.

1.5mRad feels like a "worst case" scenario from WL. Unfortunately this one steps above the worst case. Which will put down the total score.


Summary!

Oh, you made it this far. Cool :D

Host design: 5/5 (Total: medium weighting)
- Simply stunning. Sleek and smooth with nice details. Nothing to complain about. This is definitely what WL does good!
Host feel/performance: 5/5 (Total: high weighting)
- The well balanced host and push button is simply top class. It feels good in hand, and is easy and seamless to use. Feels sturdy and durable. For the price; Awesome!
Power output: 5/5 (Total: low weighting)
- Overspec by atleast 15mW at all times. Often more.
Beam quality: 2.5 / 5 (Total: very high weighting)
- With slight mode hopping and (in my very own opinion) too high divergence, and smudges (may be fixable) this is not a full pass. Comparing that I have spent $30 on DX and received pointers with measured divergence of 1.2mRad, I think that brand name pointers for over $100 retail shipped should put more focus on it.

Overall score (weighted): 3.5 / 5

- Motivation:

The primary factor for me when I rate a laser pointer is not the power output (as long as it's not severely underspec), but rather the beam quality and stability.

Unfortunately Wicked Lasers does not deliver on this. Then again arguable it may be a fully reasonable for the pricing of this unit.

This being said, the feel of the pointer is awesome. If the divergence was even 0.3mRad lower it would receive total score of 4.5/5.

It is definitely a keeper in my collection. And I do feel I have made a good deal.

Value for the money rating: 4 / 5
Glenn rating: 5 / 5




 
Last edited:





Joined
Jun 28, 2007
Messages
3,443
Points
63
Is it possible, the divergence is a bit better, when the AR window is removed? That is how it is w/ my Spyder ! green laser.

Thanks for the great review! -Glenn
 

CDHDC

0
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
248
Points
18
Nice review! I have two of these pointers and rather like them. I don't have an LPM, but had the chance to quickly use one at NWLEM. Mine measured 85mW and 97mW with used batts and a single test, each. Again, great job on the review!:gj:
 

rhd

0
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
8,475
Points
0
Fantastic review.

One crucial question:
What lens are you using to shoot those photos? Super low f-stop?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 16, 2007
Messages
3,658
Points
113
Fantastic review.

One crucial question:
What lens are you using to shoot those photos? Super low f-stop?

I noticed it, too. DOF is very shallow.

I would suggest stopping down the aperture a bit so you can get more of the image in focus. However, the first pic is pretty cool.

Nice review, btw, mhakali. I had one of these when they first came out and it was a pretty cool laser. I had trouble using NiMH batteries with it, though, because the battery tube was too narrow to accept them. I had to strip the insulation off the batteries and give them a coat of enamel so they wouldn't get jammed.
I wonder if that is still a problem with the latest as well.
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
371
Points
28
Is it possible, the divergence is a bit better, when the AR window is removed? That is how it is w/ my Spyder ! green laser.

Thanks for the great review! -Glenn

Hi Glenn!

The divergence was measured without the AR window.

Took it out for a test today this morning, just to double check. It seemed more prone to more visible mode hopping today than yesterday. Guess this one has a bit of a mood swing ;)

Thanks again!

Mikael
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
371
Points
28
Fantastic review.

CDHDC said:
Nice review! I have two of these pointers and rather like them.

Thanks! :wave: :thanks:


What lens are you using to shoot those photos? Super low f-stop?

RA_pierce said:
I noticed it, too. DOF is very shallow.

I would suggest stopping down the aperture a bit so you can get more of the image in focus. However, the first pic is pretty cool.

So, for the Photo part I used two lenses for this review. Photography is one of my other hobbies

1. Nikon Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G (shot at f/2.8 for optimal sharpness). [link]

- Those are the overview photos as it cannot focus up close to the subject, but still a very pleasant aperture

2. Nikon Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G 1:1 Micro w/ VRII (shot at f/2.8 (entry pic) - f/14 (other closeups)) [link]

- This was used for the super zoomed pictures. For full resolution, you can check out this link.

As you pointed out it has a very shallow DOF. The "entry" picture was meant to have this :) The other closeups are actually shot in f/11-f/14 with an attached Macro Ring Flash (otherwise pictures would turn out crap lightning wise at this aperture!).

Stepping it down ever further would be doable, alternatively not being THAT close to the subject! :) As it is a 1:1 reproducing MACRO lens you can get *really* close!

You can check EXIF information on each image if interested.

One thing which may interest you photon junkies is what you can see on the first picture. The foreground of the WL label is slightly red tinted in corners, and the background is green tinted. In the photo world this is called Chromatic Aberration (CA), and caused by colors in fact having different wavelengths hitting the sensor at different points using this super focal distance and aperture size.

220px-Lens6a.svg.png


Lenses do their best to correct this, but even the most expensive ones have CA artifacts as it's a property of light. Can be corrected in post-image editing tools.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 16, 2007
Messages
3,658
Points
113
As you pointed out it has a very shallow DOF. The "entry" picture was meant to have this :)

I thought so. :)

The other closeups are actually shot in f/11-f/14 with an attached Macro Ring Flash (otherwise pictures would turn out crap lightning wise at this aperture!).

I could tell you were using a ring flash because of the reflection in the laser's LED indicator. ;)
 




Top