The hosts:
Solid and heavy:yh:
Waterproof:yh:
Reverse clicky switch:yh:
Extra lens hard to keep clean:yabbem:
Sticker fell off:yabbem:
Mini-RPl:
Heavy and sturdy:yh:
Momentary switch:yh:
Good Heatsinking:yh:
Both hosts use 1 cr123 battery. The Rayfoss host is nicer in my opinion. It just feels very high quality and looks better than the mini-RPL.
Now to the power/beam tests
For these subjective tests the same batteries were used in each laser.
Graph provided by BrewCity Music(who i just got the laser from)
Beam Shots
For these subjective tests the same batteries were used in each laser.
Graph provided by BrewCity Music(who i just got the laser from)
Beam Shots
Both seem to be the same power. Even though the Mini-RPl is outputting about 100mw and the rayfoss is supposed to be in the 135-150mw region.
Dot/Divergence
Dots at about 5m away
Dots at about 5m away
The divergence on the Mini-RPL is much better than the rayfoss laser. At a greater distance there is a much more pronounced differnce. Ive tried to adjust the focal point on the rayfoss but the lens seems to be stuck in place.
Final notes
Service from Rayfoss was excellent, Faona is very responsive and it took about a week for the laser to arrive here. Also BrewCity Music is a great guy to deal with, he shipped via USPS priority mail and threw in some free defraction gratings.Based on my comparisons vs the confirmed 100mw mini-RPL, my <150mw Rayfoss laser is not up to spec. It is just as bright as the mini-RPl and it has worse divergence. I might of received a bad unit, seeing how everyone else is giving their Rayfoss lasers great reviews. I am in no way, not recommending going to Rayfoss for good lasers, but i just wish mine had a little better divergence and a little more power.
-Jeff D
P.S. Night time beam shots coming later
Last edited: