Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

New M!t$ub!$h! 638nm 0.6W diode, "soon".

piferal

piferal

0
Joined
Apr 5, 2011
Messages
1,161
Points
0
This morning I received the datasheet of the new diode from M!t$ub!$h!, which is in preparation.

According to my contact from M!t$ub!$h! there is still no fixed date for its launch, But when diode are ready, he will tell me.

Because it is a confidential document, I can not share it with you, sorry, but here I leave some of their characteristics.

High Output Power: 1.5W (Pulse) 0.6W (CW)

• High Efficiency: 1.0mW/mA (typ.)

• Visible Light: 638nm (typ.)

• φ5.6mm Capless PKG

:beer:
 





bloompyle

bloompyle

2
Joined
Apr 26, 2010
Messages
4,175
Points
83
Given that it is confidential, were you even allowed to say that? No desire to put you under fire. However, if that's ok to say, is the 0.6W rating it's "rated" output? In other words, could it be comfortably pushed to 1W+ without issue? Also, any ideas on whether is multimode of single? I wish I had "contacts" for this sort of thing :p
 
Blord

Blord

0
Joined
Dec 24, 2007
Messages
5,356
Points
0
It has all the marks of the M!t$ub!$h! 638nm 500mW diode. Maybe it is the upgraded version of the 500mW.

Is there a reason we use the word M!t$ub!$h! ?
 
Last edited:
RyanElectro

RyanElectro

0
Joined
Feb 18, 2012
Messages
796
Points
28
Blord said:
It has all the marks of the Mitsubitshi 638nm 500mW diode. Maybe it is the upgraded version of the 500mW.

Is there a reason we use the word M!t$ub!$h! ?
Click to expand...

You should use M!t$ub!$h! instead of the actual name because the actual names produce hits for search engines and web crawlers/spiders. We don't want "outsiders" peering into our diode harvesting activities do we now :eg: ;)
 
Last edited:
sinner

sinner

0
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
2,565
Points
83
Blord said:
It has all the marks of the Mitsubitshi 638nm 500mW diode. Maybe it is the upgraded version of the 500mW.

Is there a reason we use the word M!t$ub!$h! ?
Click to expand...

Yes, because them companies(brands) have an automated system which finds out how many times their company name has been used over a certain platform, and we use it quite often imo..
In their books we are "misusing" their product , so they would very much like to know what the heck we upto.. !!!
TO Avoid that ^^

So far, What we know is that we are just innocent hobbyists trying to do some fine laser tricks and not harm anyone!!! But they probably wont like it!!!

EDIT: Ryan... Beat me to it!! D:
 
Last edited:
RyanElectro

RyanElectro

0
Joined
Feb 18, 2012
Messages
796
Points
28
sinner said:
Yes, because them companies(brands) have an automated system which finds out how many times their company name has been used over a certain platform, and we use it quite often imo..
In their books we are "misusing" their product , so they would very much like to know what the heck we upto.. !!!
TO Avoid that ^^

So far, What we know is that we are just innocent hobbyists trying to do some fine laser tricks and not harm anyone!!! But they probably wont like it!!!

EDIT: Ryan... Beat me to it!! D:
Click to expand...

Similar reps think alike ;)
 
piferal

piferal

0
Joined
Apr 5, 2011
Messages
1,161
Points
0
weeba2kv said:
I will eat my old sock if it's single mode :D
Click to expand...

I doubt that is single mode, however in the datasheet does not put this data.

Beam divergence angle (parallel) CW, Po=0.6W 1° Min 7.5° Typ. 15° Max.

Beam divergence angle (perpendicular) CW, Po=0.6W 25° Min. 35° Typ. 45° Max.

bloompyle said:
Given that it is confidential, were you even allowed to say that? No desire to put you under fire. However, if that's ok to say, is the 0.6W rating it's "rated" output? In other words, could it be comfortably pushed to 1W+ without issue? Also, any ideas on whether is multimode of single? I wish I had "contacts" for this sort of thing :p
Click to expand...

There is not a military secret haha, anyway is the datasheet cannot make it
known publicly, but I can separate some data here, is only to share among
yourselves and to be the first to know.

Is the risk, but I hope not bring me problems hahaha

Blord said:
It has all the marks of the M!t$ub!$h! 638nm 500mW diode. Maybe it is the upgraded version of the 500mW.

Is there a reason we use the word M!t$ub!$h! ?
Click to expand...

It's my choice not to put the brand, and I think everyone should do the same.
 
Last edited:
sinner

sinner

0
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
2,565
Points
83
InfinitusEquitas said:
Interesting. Can't wait for an update. Doubtful that it's a single mode... but we can dream:)
Click to expand...

To date single mode reds (5.6mm LPC's) arnt capable of excess of 300mW
I hope someone comes along with a vision of quad-mode LD
which has an emitter of 2x2 (forming a square beam overlapping) i could kill
for a sqare-ish beam with 4x the power and specs on single-mod instead of a flappy beam!! IF ONLY m!t$ guys had this idea before!!
And then offcourse i'm day-dreaming again!!!
 
Last edited:
yobresal

yobresal

0
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
4,919
Points
83
I as well as others have had LPC's up at 450mW with 650-G-1 lens. I think I even saw a 500mW once. So they are capable of excess of 300mW you just run the risk of a shortened life or immediate death.
 
sinner

sinner

0
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
2,565
Points
83
yobresal said:
I as well as others have had LPC's up at 450mW with 650-G-1 lens. I think I even saw a 500mW once. So they are capable of excess of 300mW you just run the risk of a shortened life or immediate death.
Click to expand...

I agree with you Yob, But it was an average estimate!!
Anyways Thanks for pointing out.. :beer:
Still though !! It, would be cool if they follow my idea :whistle:

EDIT: i too have had a 400mW red @597mA!! I know the drill !! :D
 
Last edited:
InfinitusEquitas

InfinitusEquitas

0
Joined
Mar 27, 2011
Messages
14,125
Points
113
IIRC at one point Wannaburn was going to put together a a quad or tri lpc build to hit over 1W.

Unfortunately afaik he needed Dr.Lava's input on optics, and he's been MIA for a while now.
 
sinner

sinner

0
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
2,565
Points
83
InfinitusEquitas said:
IIRC at one point Wannaburn was going to put together a a quad or tri lpc build to hit over 1W.

Unfortunately afaik he needed Dr.Lava's input on optics, and he's been MIA for a while now.
Click to expand...

MIA thats too damn funny !! We should'nt be back-biting Dr.L !!

At combining two or more reds.. I've seen 10 of them knife-edged i dont remember whose thread was that!! Sorry but its been done.. Not in a handheld though if thats what u mean!!
 
BShanahan14rulz

BShanahan14rulz

0
Joined
Dec 29, 2009
Messages
3,136
Points
63
Sounds like another open can design? Someone better take some macro photos of these suckers whenever they actually do make it out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.




Top