Podo
0
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2013
- Messages
- 717
- Points
- 63
Been slience for quite a while, today I came across with a new 7mm lens - G7 as my supplier told me. Looks similiar to G1 with a flat surface.
I believes it's a redesigned g lens for high power & divergence diode like 7875.
Video from starlight comparing other lenses with G7:
G7 is Coated for 400~550nm.
lens area dia: 7mm with 6.4mm of light pass through
Thickness: 2.5mm
barrels : 5mm or 9mm holder
Closest focal length : 8mm
From my full tests on 7875/7675/7A75 today the beam aparture of 7875 is around 5mm with the same dot size as three elements lens. And the rectangle shadow is "gone" too you barely see it if you don't try hard enough.
Readings from my LPM showing the power loss is greater than G2/G1 but better than 3-elements:
445nm 7875 with G2 : 3.5W , divergence >3
445nm 7875 with G7 : 3W , divergence ~1.5
445nm 7875 with 3E : 2.7W , divergence ~1.5
445nm 7A75 with G2 : 5.6W , divergence >4
445nm 7A75 with G7 : 4.9W , divergence >2
445nm 7A75 with 3E : 4.3W , divergence >2
462nm 7675 with G2: 2W divergence >3
462nm 7675 with G7: 1.6W divergence ~1.5
462nm 7675 with 3E: 1.5W divergence ~1.5
445nm 7875 with G2 dot in 4.5m : 1.7cm
445nm 7875 with G7 dot in 4.5m : 0.85cm
445nm 7A75 with G2 dot in 4.5m : 3.4cm
445nm 7A75 with G7 dot in 4.5m : 1.7 cm
My 5x G7 has arrived today:
So in conclusion, G7 produce a beam and dot like 3 element lens usually does but with a more light passing than 3 element lens although not as good as G1/2.
I would suggest to use G7 for a 7475/7675/7875 handheld but not 7A75 as the divergence of 7A75 is too big, only the middle part of the light would contact on the lens.
The post has been edited entirely along with the information... There's huge different from what I said previously but I just want to give the correct information as everybody does here on LPF.
Lenses sent to thejoker301 & starlight for better test and data. :beer
Let's see what is the real deal for this lens.:wave:
I believes it's a redesigned g lens for high power & divergence diode like 7875.
Video from starlight comparing other lenses with G7:
G7 is Coated for 400~550nm.
lens area dia: 7mm with 6.4mm of light pass through
Thickness: 2.5mm
barrels : 5mm or 9mm holder
Closest focal length : 8mm
From my full tests on 7875/7675/7A75 today the beam aparture of 7875 is around 5mm with the same dot size as three elements lens. And the rectangle shadow is "gone" too you barely see it if you don't try hard enough.
Readings from my LPM showing the power loss is greater than G2/G1 but better than 3-elements:
445nm 7875 with G2 : 3.5W , divergence >3
445nm 7875 with G7 : 3W , divergence ~1.5
445nm 7875 with 3E : 2.7W , divergence ~1.5
445nm 7A75 with G2 : 5.6W , divergence >4
445nm 7A75 with G7 : 4.9W , divergence >2
445nm 7A75 with 3E : 4.3W , divergence >2
462nm 7675 with G2: 2W divergence >3
462nm 7675 with G7: 1.6W divergence ~1.5
462nm 7675 with 3E: 1.5W divergence ~1.5
445nm 7875 with G2 dot in 4.5m : 1.7cm
445nm 7875 with G7 dot in 4.5m : 0.85cm
445nm 7A75 with G2 dot in 4.5m : 3.4cm
445nm 7A75 with G7 dot in 4.5m : 1.7 cm
My 5x G7 has arrived today:
So in conclusion, G7 produce a beam and dot like 3 element lens usually does but with a more light passing than 3 element lens although not as good as G1/2.
I would suggest to use G7 for a 7475/7675/7875 handheld but not 7A75 as the divergence of 7A75 is too big, only the middle part of the light would contact on the lens.
The post has been edited entirely along with the information... There's huge different from what I said previously but I just want to give the correct information as everybody does here on LPF.
Lenses sent to thejoker301 & starlight for better test and data. :beer
Let's see what is the real deal for this lens.:wave:
Last edited: