Laser pointer discussion. Read/write reviews of laser pointers and laser pointer companies. Learn about all types of laser pointers and lasers





Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums! If you are looking for a laser pointer or want to compare different laser pointer companies, you may want to check out the LPF Laser Pointer Company Database. The link will open in a new window for your convenience.








Green Laser Pointers by Category Blue Laser Pointers by Category Red Laser Pointers by Category
Yellow Laser Pointers by Category Violet Laser Pointers by Category Orange Laser Pointers by Category
Top Laser Pointers by Power - 1 Watt+ Top Laser Pointers by Power - 500mW+ Top Laser Pointers by Power - 250mW+
Laser Pointer Database High Power Laser Pointers Laser Pointer Diodes
Laser Technology Laser Pointer Parts Lasers by Wavelength
Top 10 Laser Pointer Companies Laser Pointer Company Database Visible Beam Laser Pointers


One laser store meets all your needs

























Go Back   Laser Pointer Forums - Discuss Laser Pointers > Lasers > Optics



LPF List of Laser Pointer Companies (link opens new window)



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-31-2008, 07:37 PM #1
Class 1M Laser
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 192
Rep Power: 10
Maelstrom is on a distinguished road
Maelstrom Maelstrom is offline
Class 1M Laser
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 192
Rep Power: 10
Maelstrom is on a distinguished road
Default destructive interference?

Have you guys ever created complete destructive intereference by shining two lasers together? IE shining two beams through a prism or whatever you sue to combine beams and have nothing come out( or it be very dim)? This is the only example of destructive intereference with light I can seem to find, or that was ever presented to me...


Maelstrom is offline   Reply With Quote







LPF List of Laser Pointer Companies (link opens new window)







Old 05-31-2008, 08:17 PM #2
Class 2 Laser
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 373
Rep Power: 14
climbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the rough
climbak climbak is offline
Class 2 Laser
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 373
Rep Power: 14
climbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: destructive interference?

To have interference the light needs to be coherent. Light from different sources is mutually incoherent. This means that two sources of light wont interfere with each other. There may be a way to make seperate sources coherent, but I'm not sure off the top of my head and it's pretty safe to say that in everday type things you won't encounter this. The double slit interference is just one example. Diffraction gratings and holograms are other examples. Here is a picture of an optical vortex, which is basically a fancy way of saying a hole in the middle, using a forked grating:
climbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2008, 01:07 AM #3
Class 1M Laser
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 192
Rep Power: 10
Maelstrom is on a distinguished road
Maelstrom Maelstrom is offline
Class 1M Laser
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 192
Rep Power: 10
Maelstrom is on a distinguished road
Default Re: destructive interference?

THanks. But say you were able to create two sources of light; same speed, frequency, and wavelength( making them coherent, correct?), would it be possible then? In the physics class Im in at school, we only touched on complete constuctive and destructive intereference, so is there partial interference? FInally( last question) why is it so much easier to have destructive interference with sound than light?
Maelstrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2008, 02:16 PM #4
Class 2 Laser
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 373
Rep Power: 14
climbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the rough
climbak climbak is offline
Class 2 Laser
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 373
Rep Power: 14
climbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: destructive interference?

Having two seperate, but identical light sources does not make them mutually coherent. There may be a way to force two sources into coherence by passing through slits or some other means, but I am not sure exactly how it would be done. I suppose if you were able to create a purely single frequency source then it wouldn't be nearly as hard, but even lasers usually have a fairly high spread in frequency; diodes more so than gas for example. As for the partial interference, the answer is yes. Take the output from the double slit experiment. The only places where fully constructive or destructive interference will happen is right on the minima and maxima. Everywhere else the interference is just partial. My guess to why it's easier to have interference with sound is that sound travels through a medium where light needs no mediumand the tolerance levels when trying to match frequencies are much more leniant with sound. I am sure there are other reasons as well, but thats just my guess.
climbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2008, 01:04 AM #5
Class 1M Laser
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 192
Rep Power: 10
Maelstrom is on a distinguished road
Maelstrom Maelstrom is offline
Class 1M Laser
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 192
Rep Power: 10
Maelstrom is on a distinguished road
Default Re: destructive interference?

Thanks!
Are you a physicist or aiming to be one? You always seem to be very knowledgable and chime in or know answers to these kind of topics....
Maelstrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2008, 01:50 AM #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 0
NovoRei is on a distinguished road
NovoRei NovoRei is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 0
NovoRei is on a distinguished road
Default Re: destructive interference?

So, imagine you join two beams dephased by 180 degrees.

The energy is lost? Could you separate the beams?
NovoRei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2008, 04:38 AM #7
Class 2 Laser
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 373
Rep Power: 14
climbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the rough
climbak climbak is offline
Class 2 Laser
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 373
Rep Power: 14
climbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the roughclimbak is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: destructive interference?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maelstrom
Thanks!
Are you a physicist or aiming to be one? You always seem to be very knowledgable and chime in or know answers to these kind of topics....
yes actually. I have a year left before I get my BS in Physics. After that I dont know yet.

NovaRei:
I dont think that two seperate beams would cancel eath other out. Even though they may be 180 degrees out of phase, that doesnt mean they are coherent. Their electric fields would add up and basically just double the intensity. For example, with the laser system I am working on right now we are counting on the fact that seperate laser sources will be mutually incoherent and not interfere with each other when writing holograms. Even a beam from the same source will lose coherence after a certain length.
climbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 06:52 PM #8
flogged's Avatar
Class 2M Laser
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 530
Rep Power: 47
flogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond repute
flogged flogged is offline
Class 2M Laser
flogged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 530
Rep Power: 47
flogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond reputeflogged has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: destructive interference?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maelstrom
Have you guys ever created complete destructive intereference by shining two lasers together? IE shining two beams through a prism or whatever you sue to combine beams and have nothing come out( or it be very dim)? This is the only example of destructive intereference with light I can seem to find, or that was ever presented to me...
Climbak is right - two laser beams from different sources, even if the same frequency, will not interfere with each other.

I'm not certain what the reasons for this are. At least with diode lasers there are minute variances between the frequency of two given diodes, depending on temperature and manufacturing. Basically the two sources need to somehow be correlated with each other at some point in the past before they will interfere.

Usually when making holograms a single laser is used, and the beam is split and then recombined to interfere at the object to create the hologram. I posted your question to <alt.lasers> years ago. Seem to recall I got a response from someone saying that '4th order' interference (whatever that means) has been observed from two separate gas lasers, though it's not easy to do.

I know that at radio frequencies (still EM radiation) interference techniques are used all the time, for example in phased arrays and superhet receivers.

I like this little animation on interference:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=6Q4_nl0ICao

Interference is one of the things that fascinates me about lasers - you don't have to look hard to find it. It makes the wave nature of light obvious. For example my avatar is made by simply reflecting a laser beam off a frosted incandescent light bulb. The projected spot is an interference pattern modulated by the surface of the bulb. Laser speckle is also interference - the space in the room is filled with the interference pattern, it's why you can't focus on it. I'm nearsighted, and it's easier for me to see speckle when I take my glasses off - everything gets a little fuzzy, but the speckle remains sharp.
flogged is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 01:57 PM #9
likewhat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
likewhat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: destructive interference?

As said above the lasers would have to have the same frequency and in addition have some definite phase correlation in order to "cancel" the light.

Even if you use actively stabilized lasers the instantaneous linewidth of which can be one the order a few Hz that means that after a second the phase would have changed relative to another laser of the same frequency. Even the world record most highly stabilized lasers would only perfectly destructively interfere for a second before they would constructively interfere.

That is not to say that when you overlap 2 different lasers you dont get interference. You most certainly do, in fact you can overlap 2 lasers of different frequencies and create a new source of coherent light at the difference of the two frequencies. This is one of the ways that Terahertz radiation sources are created.

The thing you have to understand is that since laser radiation is of such a high frequency the difference in the frequency of two lasers if not actively stabilized will be GHz and constantly drifting. That means that the interference pattern will be turning the light on and off many times per nanosecond so you will just see and average and it will appear to be light the whole time. If you overlap two lasers on a very fast photo detector and connect it to an oscilloscope you will see a wave appear that will be the difference of the 2 frequencies of the lasers. In fact if you can control the frequencies of your lasers you can use this method with some electronics to control the frequency of one laser relative to another (it is called rf offset locking).

So the answer is yes, but not in the way you were thinking of due to the lack of a definite phase relationship between the lasers and the difference in their frequencies.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 12:09 AM #10
Class 3R Laser
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,032
Rep Power: 31
pseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud of
pseudonomen137 pseudonomen137 is offline
Class 3R Laser
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,032
Rep Power: 31
pseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud ofpseudonomen137 has much to be proud of
Default Re: destructive interference?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NovoRei
So, imagine you join two beams dephased by 180 degrees.

The energy is lost? Could you separate the beams?
Nope, its not impossible for the energy to be lost (or so I'm told ). In the case of destructive intereference about to happen, you'll find instead of the laser continuing along its logical path, it'll instead get reflected so you don't end up with any loopholes to the laws of physics.

If you're interested in that type of stuff, you should try making your own simple interferometer. Not a lab-grade measuring device, but if you pick up some surplus optics (some front/first surface mirrors and either some 50/50 beamsplitter prisms of 50/50 half-silvered mirrors [those helping hands alligator clip things make simple cheap holders for aligning this stuff]) you can make a simple Michelson or Mach-Zedner interferometer with a laser and a few tens of dollars (if even that). Its pretty cool once you get it setup!
pseudonomen137 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2008, 08:30 AM #11
Class 1 Laser
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 9
LikeitBright will become famous soon enough
LikeitBright LikeitBright is offline
Class 1 Laser
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 9
LikeitBright will become famous soon enough
Default Re: destructive interference?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maelstrom
Have you guys ever created *complete destructive intereference by shining two lasers together? IE shining two beams through a prism or whatever you sue to combine beams and have nothing come out( or it be very dim)? This is the only example of destructive intereference with light I can seem to find, or that was ever presented to me...
The individual lasers won't be correctly phased so you probably won't see any interference. *Usually one source is optically split and recombined to demonstrate interference. Interference is just a matter of redistributing the optical energy. Bright fringes become brighter than the contribution from either source while the dark areas of destructive interference are 'nulls'. And yes, it is a bit weird.
LikeitBright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 01:04 AM #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
brigman is infamous around these partsbrigman is infamous around these partsbrigman is infamous around these parts
brigman brigman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
brigman is infamous around these partsbrigman is infamous around these partsbrigman is infamous around these parts
Default Re: destructive interference?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maelstrom View Post
Have you guys ever created complete destructive intereference by shining two lasers together? IE shining two beams through a prism or whatever you sue to combine beams and have nothing come out( or it be very dim)? This is the only example of destructive intereference with light I can seem to find, or that was ever presented to me...
A laser diode is highly coherent quantum system and it has been observed that only photons or particles from the same quantum source will display the type of interference you describe (non-classical interference). See this link for more information.
brigman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 02:14 AM #13
lasersbee's Avatar
Class 4 Laser
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 15,783
Rep Power: 42214
lasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond repute
lasersbee lasersbee is offline
Class 4 Laser
lasersbee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 15,783
Rep Power: 42214
lasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond reputelasersbee has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: destructive interference?

Hey brigman...

As a new Member.... you should perhaps READ the date of the Post
that you are replying to....
That Thread has been DEAD for over one and a half years....

Jerry
__________________

J.BAUER Electronics Home Page

LaserBee Laser Power Meter Products meet your needs
at affordable Prices:
See them all here on LPF

LaserBee Power Meter products ALWAYS in Stock
and ready to ship

Also available on eBay:Check availability here..

Subsidary: Pharma Electronic Solutions


This banner is available to and can be copied/used FREE by any LaserBee owner
lasersbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 05:18 AM #14
f22warzone's Avatar
Class 2M Laser
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
Rep Power: 52
f22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to f22warzone
f22warzone f22warzone is offline
Class 2M Laser
f22warzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
Rep Power: 52
f22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond reputef22warzone has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to f22warzone
Default Re: destructive interference?

Thanks for bringing it up tho i have never seen this post and its very cool and informative a bit old but still cool : )
__________________
X-125 Doing 136 Avg with 138mw peak..... Most stable DPSS I have ever seen by +-2mw
1.5W 523nm Viasho doing 1.78W : )
f22warzone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 08:23 AM #15
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
brigman is infamous around these partsbrigman is infamous around these partsbrigman is infamous around these parts
brigman brigman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
brigman is infamous around these partsbrigman is infamous around these partsbrigman is infamous around these parts
Default Re: destructive interference?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lasersbee View Post
Hey brigman...

As a new Member.... you should perhaps READ the date of the Post
that you are replying to....
That Thread has been DEAD for over one and a half years....

Jerry
Hey Jerry, you will probably spend a lot of your time wondering why your relationships lack that certain something: it's just you.

I hope you work it out mate.

BTW: @Admins kick me, ban me or whatever, in what world would I care?
brigman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 10:47 AM #16
HIMNL9's Avatar
Class 4 Laser
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lost somewhere in the EU mess ;)
Posts: 5,416
Rep Power: 404
HIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond repute
HIMNL9 HIMNL9 is offline
Class 4 Laser
HIMNL9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lost somewhere in the EU mess ;)
Posts: 5,416
Rep Power: 404
HIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond reputeHIMNL9 has a reputation beyond repute
Question Re: destructive interference?

Quote:
Originally Posted by brigman View Post
Hey Jerry, you will probably spend a lot of your time wondering why your relationships lack that certain something: it's just you.

I hope you work it out mate.

BTW: @Admins kick me, ban me or whatever, in what world would I care?
Ehm, sorry if i say you this, but, don't you think that you're overreacting a bit ?

After all, Jerry just pointed you to the fact that the thread was dead, and from a long time .....

In these cases, is usually better to start a new thread, asking for the same thing, and maybe also linking the old one as example, instead to resurrect the old one, you don't think ?

(and, by the way, this forum usually don't ban peoples just if they resurrect old threads for error, as instead other forums do ..... but asking the admins to do it, in this way, just cause you don't like a reply ..... you don't think that is just a bit too unfair ? ..... not bashing you for that, just asking .....)
__________________
High Impulse Multipath Neutron Laser (mark 9 ) (LOL)
Dare mo mita koto no nai, kaze, kumo, suna, umi ..... Kokoro no hate no doko ka eien ga kagayaku.
HIMNL9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply





Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On











Loading








Green Laser Pointers by Category Blue Laser Pointers by Category Red Laser Pointers by Category
Yellow Laser Pointers by Category Violet Laser Pointers by Category Orange Laser Pointers by Category
Top Laser Pointers by Power - 1 Watt+ Top Laser Pointers by Power - 500mW+ Top Laser Pointers by Power - 250mW+
Laser Pointer Database High Power Laser Pointers Laser Pointer Diodes






Privacy Policy | Advertising Disclaimer | Terms of Use


 


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:09 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO
Privacy Policy | Advertising Disclaimer | Terms of Use
Copyright (C) 2017 Laser Pointer Forums, LLC