Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

405 and 473, ten years old!

Joined
Dec 24, 2007
Messages
1,000
Points
63
And still lasing like champs!

18766575_10155321844619417_5474861643350900835_o.jpg
 





Joined
Apr 9, 2016
Messages
1,067
Points
83
Wow! I've barely been in the hobby long enough to wonder whether or not my lasers could be wearing down:crackup:

Cool post! +rep
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2013
Messages
17,433
Points
113
Can't really tell the difference by the color. One should be violet and the other a light blue. I'm glad you have two pointers still working after 10 years. That 473nm must have cost quite a lot back in 2007.
 
Joined
Dec 24, 2007
Messages
1,000
Points
63
Can't really tell the difference by the color. One should be violet and the other a light blue. I'm glad you have two pointers still working after 10 years. That 473nm must have cost quite a lot back in 2007.

Yeah I've struggled for years to be able to capture the difference in color between to two. It tends to look more or less correct if I photograph either separately, but photographing them together washes it out. The 405 was Dr. Lava's proof of concept for the flexdrive in a pen. It was originally hooked up to some red diode and pumping out about 200mW, but I requested a blu-ray diode because they were the hotness at the time. I got the 473 in a group buy from Laserglow on sale, but it was still $545 before shipping lol.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2013
Messages
17,433
Points
113
I figured it cost something like that. Still don't get why your camera won't differentiate between the two. They are quite far apart in wavelength.
 
Joined
Dec 24, 2007
Messages
1,000
Points
63
I figured it cost something like that. Still don't get why your camera won't differentiate between the two. They are quite far apart in wavelength.

Do people get cameras to consistently differentiate them now? Back in the day this was considered normal :undecided:
 

CurtisOliver

0
LPF Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
7,610
Points
113
Wow, very impressive. I do wonder how much longer they will last. $545 for how much power in at 473nm? I knew they wouldn't of been cheap back then, they still aren't that cheap now.
 

BobMc

0
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
3,685
Points
113
Impressive, after 10 years still going strong? :gj:
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2013
Messages
17,433
Points
113
Do people get cameras to consistently differentiate them now? Back in the day this was considered normal :undecided:

I don't think people buy cameras to differentiate colors, per se, but mine is only five years old, has 20M pixels and does differentiate colors quite well. It might just be the state of the art for cameras now, though you can get pickups that are CCDs or CMOS, and the picture density increases every year.
 
Joined
Dec 24, 2007
Messages
1,000
Points
63
Wow, very impressive. I do wonder how much longer they will last. $545 for how much power in at 473nm? I knew they wouldn't of been cheap back then, they still aren't that cheap now.

When I got it from Laserglow, the little card it came with said it had a 17mW peak and a 3mW average. I feel like that was probably pretty close to what it did then. Now it'll give me 2-3mW on a normal day on my Laserbee and peaks at 7-8.

The scary part is, back then $545 was considered cheap for this thing lol
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2013
Messages
17,433
Points
113
Yeah, that's not much power in today's market. I'm sure it was a bargain back in 2007. Hope it lasts for ten more years.
 

Benm

0
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
7,896
Points
113
Those 473 nm sure used to be expensive, and they actually still are when using a DPSS approach even today. Laser diodes are now a viable alternative to get a similar wavelength at much lower cost, though the beam specs on that 10 year old dpss are probably still a lot better.

As for what a camera makes of a colour: Do not care about this at all.

Camera's are built to shoot pictures of landscapes, people, buildings and such naturally occurring things people tend to take photos off. They are not arrays of several million specrometers mounted on a single chip.

Some camera's work better than others for capturing laser beams, but anything with automatic white balancing will surely make a mess. But even if you circumvent that by taking a photo of the dot of an already well-lit wall (and fixed color rendering to 'cloudy' or 'sunny') the monochromatic light may cause the color to be different than what your eyes see.
 

CurtisOliver

0
LPF Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
7,610
Points
113
Now that just shows you how things have changed. You still can't go and pick up a 473 just like you can a cheap 532 but they certainly have become more accessible to us now, and with higher powers. Also 7-8mW peak is still impressive for a very old 473 pointer. :)
 




Top