Welcome to Laser Pointer Forums - discuss green laser pointers, blue laser pointers, and all types of lasers

LPF Donation via Stripe | LPF Donation - Other Methods

Links below open in new window

ArcticMyst Security by Avery

Obama Signs Bill

LSRFAQ

0
Joined
May 8, 2009
Messages
1,155
Points
83
Obama Signs Bill:

from the laser light show mailing list:

Yesterday, U.S. President Barack Obama signed a bill which includes a provision making it a federal crime to aim a laser pointer at an aircraft, or at the flight path of an aircraft in U.S. airspace. The language in H.R. 658's Section 311 will become Title 18, Chapter 2, Section 39A of the United States Code. A complete text of the law is below.


U.S.C. TITLE 18, CHAPTER 2

Sec. 39A. Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft

(a) OFFENSE -- Whoever knowingly aims the beam of a laser pointer at an aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States, or at the flight path of such an aircraft, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(b) LASER POINTER DEFINED -- As used in this section, the term `laser pointer' means any device designed or used to amplify electromagnetic radiation by stimulated emission that emits a beam designed to be used by the operator as a pointer or highlighter to indicate, mark, or identify a specific position, place, item, or object.

(c) EXCEPTIONS -- This section does not prohibit aiming a beam of a laser pointer at an aircraft, or the flight path of such an aircraft, by--
(1) an authorized individual in the conduct of research and development or flight test operations conducted by an aircraft manufacturer, the Federal Aviation Administration, or any other person authorized by the Federal Aviation Administration to conduct such research and development or flight test operations;
(2) members or elements of the Department of Defense or Department of Homeland Security acting in an official capacity for the purpose of research, development, operations, testing or training; or
(3) by an individual using a laser emergency signaling device to send an emergency distress signal.

(d) The Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation, may provide by regulation, after public notice and comment, such additional exceptions to this section, as may be necessary and appropriate. The Attorney General shall provide written notification of any proposed regulations under this section to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House and Senate, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure in the House, and the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation in the Senate not less than 90 days before such regulations become final.

----msg ends----

Steve
 





Joined
Dec 27, 2011
Messages
2,062
Points
48
Obama Signs Bill:

from the laser light show mailing list:

Yesterday, U.S. President Barack Obama signed a bill which includes a provision making it a federal crime to aim a laser pointer at an aircraft, or at the flight path of an aircraft in U.S. airspace. The language in H.R. 658's Section 311 will become Title 18, Chapter 2, Section 39A of the United States Code. A complete text of the law is below.


U.S.C. TITLE 18, CHAPTER 2

Sec. 39A. Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft

(a) OFFENSE -- Whoever knowingly aims the beam of a laser pointer at an aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States, or at the flight path of such an aircraft, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(b) LASER POINTER DEFINED -- As used in this section, the term `laser pointer' means any device designed or used to amplify electromagnetic radiation by stimulated emission that emits a beam designed to be used by the operator as a pointer or highlighter to indicate, mark, or identify a specific position, place, item, or object.

(c) EXCEPTIONS -- This section does not prohibit aiming a beam of a laser pointer at an aircraft, or the flight path of such an aircraft, by--
(1) an authorized individual in the conduct of research and development or flight test operations conducted by an aircraft manufacturer, the Federal Aviation Administration, or any other person authorized by the Federal Aviation Administration to conduct such research and development or flight test operations;
(2) members or elements of the Department of Defense or Department of Homeland Security acting in an official capacity for the purpose of research, development, operations, testing or training; or
(3) by an individual using a laser emergency signaling device to send an emergency distress signal.

(d) The Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation, may provide by regulation, after public notice and comment, such additional exceptions to this section, as may be necessary and appropriate. The Attorney General shall provide written notification of any proposed regulations under this section to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House and Senate, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure in the House, and the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation in the Senate not less than 90 days before such regulations become final.

----msg ends----

Steve

Well heck,

I already thought it WAS a crime before now. And I wouldn't do it purposefully out of ethics.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2011
Messages
3,816
Points
63
That's actually really good. The bill says "KNOWINGLY", so that basically prevents cops from fining us because we were pointing lasers in the sky. Unless we were knowingly pointing it at an aircraft or an aircraft flight path, then we aren't breaking any laws.
 

Ash

0
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
1,981
Points
0
Thanks so much for this info and the Steve.
I'm glad it is a Federal Offense to hit an aircraft with a laser. There are too many kids out there messing around. Hopefully their parents will see this. :D
...Exceptions...
(3) by an individual using a laser emergency signaling device to send an emergency distress signal.

----msg ends----
Perfect excuse to keep a 1.8W in my camping kit. :angel:
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2011
Messages
14,125
Points
113
I find this bill to be somewhat redundant, but not really a bad thing.

Thanks for posting the info. I knew it was on his desk, but wasn't following it closely.

Perfect excuse to keep a 1.8W in my camping kit. :angel:

There is that.

Also as Wolf points out, this part makes no sense to me:

(a) OFFENSE -- Whoever knowingly aims the beam of a laser pointer at an aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States, or at the flight path of such an aircraft, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

I suppose it gives some leeway in the event of an accidental illumination, but it also opens the door to the defense claiming "He thought it was a star." or some other BS.
 

DrSid

0
Joined
Jul 17, 2010
Messages
1,506
Points
48
Yeah .. sounds reasonably. Let's hope EU won't come with some 'ban it all' approach ..
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2011
Messages
14,125
Points
113
^^^EU/US often tend to act in lockstep when it comes to restrictive policies. I expect a similar law in the UK shortly. (If there isn't already one.)
 
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
1,487
Points
63
Thanks for sharing this!

Personally I think its a good thing to put at least something little on the books to stem the tide of misuse.
 

LSRFAQ

0
Joined
May 8, 2009
Messages
1,155
Points
83
It is distressing in one respect. It leaves NO clear loophole for research or laser show lasers in air space. FAA assures ILDA that this is not a issue.
I'd like to see that in writing.

It is a bit broad in its definitions, especially "flight path"


Steve
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
2,894
Points
0
^^Good point.

Thing is, it also defined a laser pointer at a device for highlighting objects. Problem is, this does not cover all the bases that could otherwise be emitting light. I could see any large frame argon as falling out of the "pointer" category.
 
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
1,487
Points
63
That's a good point, it is lacking real meat and is left open to the officer to read into it as they will.(this unfortunately is happening more and more with new laws, ambiguity left to the arresting officer to define)
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2011
Messages
1,109
Points
0
Well, I'm good. I don't use lasers as a "pointer or highlighter to indicate, mark, or identify a specific position, place, item, or object", I only use them to BuRN StufFz! lol
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
17,622
Points
113
I think that this should be stickied in the Welcome section of
of the Forum...


Jerry
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2011
Messages
14,125
Points
113
Well, I'm good. I don't use lasers as a "pointer or highlighter to indicate, mark, or identify a specific position, place, item, or object", I only use them to BuRN StufFz! lol

Oh yes. That will go over really well with the cops.

"But occifer, I wasn't trying to point at the plane, I was trying to burn my name on it's side!" :tinfoil:

Wasn't it already illegal here? Or was that just some/most states?

Afaik the laws in the EU vary right now from country to country.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 29, 2009
Messages
3,136
Points
63
(this unfortunately is happening more and more with new laws, ambiguity left to the arresting officer to define)

It's all about taking more money than they should from us. If you and an officer apply logic and arrive at the conclusion that you accidentally pointed it at the path of a plane, then nobody gets any extra money. If you are deemed to have maliciously pointed to the aircraft's flight path, you have to pay a ton of money even if you successfully defend yourself in court. Maybe not a ton of money, but more than the other scenario.
 




Top